• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

DMCA

Why Johnny can’t encrypt: A usability evaluation of PGP 5.0 (1999)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.eecs.berkeley.edu]
  • [www.cs.berkeley.edu]
  • [people.ischool.berkeley.edu]
  • [people.ischool.berkeley.edu]
  • [static.usenix.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [static.usenix.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [people.cs.vt.edu]
  • [people.cs.vt.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.utk.edu]
  • [www.cs.indiana.edu]
  • [www.ussrback.com]
  • [www.cs.jhu.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [simson.net]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [users.ece.cmu.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [www.cs.colorado.edu]
  • [www.ccs.neu.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [tnlandforms.us]
  • [www.cs.indiana.edu]
  • [users.ece.cmu.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [web.eecs.utk.edu]
  • [www.cs.colorado.edu]
  • [users.ece.cmu.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Alma Whitten , J. D. Tygar
Citations:479 - 4 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Whitten99whyjohnny,
    author = {Alma Whitten and J. D. Tygar},
    title = {Why Johnny can’t encrypt: A usability evaluation of PGP 5.0},
    year = {1999}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

User errors cause or contribute to most computer security failures, yet user interfaces for security still tend to be clumsy, confusing, or near-nonexistent. Is this simply due to a failure to apply standard user interface design techniques to security? We argue that, on the contrary, effective security requires a different usability standard, and that it will not be achieved through the user interface design techniques appropriate to other types of consumer software. To test this hypothesis, we performed a case study of a security program which does have a good user interface by general standards: PGP 5.0. Our case study used a cognitive walkthrough analysis together with a laboratory user test to evaluate whether PGP 5.0 can be successfully used by cryptography novices to achieve effective electronic mail security. The analysis found a number of user interface design flaws that may contribute to security failures, and the user test demonstrated that when our test participants were given 90 minutes in which to sign and encrypt a message using PGP 5.0, the majority of them were unable to do so successfully. We conclude that PGP 5.0 is not usable enough to provide effective security for most computer users, despite its attractive graphical user interface, supporting our hypothesis that user interface design for effective security remains an open problem. We close with a brief description of our continuing work on the development and application of user interface design principles and techniques for security.

Keyphrases

usability evaluation    effective security    case study    user interface    standard user interface design technique    consumer software    cryptography novice    laboratory user test    security program    effective electronic mail security    user interface design    computer security failure    user test    brief description    user error    attractive graphical user interface    test participant    user interface design technique    security failure    cognitive walkthrough analysis    open problem    computer user    good user interface    user interface design principle    user interface design flaw    different usability standard    general standard   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University