• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Learning to Order Things (1998)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [dnkweb.denken.or.jp]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.lirmm.fr]
  • [www.lirmm.fr]
  • [www.research.att.com]
  • [www.research.att.com]
  • [www1.ccls.columbia.edu]
  • [www-connex.lip6.fr]
  • [www-poleia.lip6.fr]
  • [www-poleia.lip6.fr]
  • [www-connex.lip6.fr]
  • [labs.rightnow.com]
  • [papers.nips.cc]
  • [people.csail.mit.edu]
  • [www.csail.mit.edu]
  • [people.csail.mit.edu]
  • [www.ai.mit.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by William W. Cohen , Robert E. Schapire , Yoram Singer
Venue:Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Citations:408 - 12 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Cohen98learningto,
    author = {William W. Cohen and Robert E. Schapire and Yoram Singer},
    title = {Learning to Order Things},
    journal = {Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},
    year = {1998},
    volume = {10},
    pages = {243--270}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

There are many applications in which it is desirable to order rather than classify instances. Here we consider the problem of learning how to order, given feedback in the form of preference judgments, i.e., statements to the effect that one instance should be ranked ahead of another. We outline a two-stage approach in which one first learns by conventional means a preference function, of the form PREF(u; v), which indicates whether it is advisable to rank u before v. New instances are then ordered so as to maximize agreements with the learned preference function. We show that the problem of finding the ordering that agrees best with a preference function is NP-complete, even under very restrictive assumptions. Nevertheless, we describe a simple greedy algorithm that is guaranteed to find a good approximation. We then discuss an on-line learning algorithm, based on the "Hedge" algorithm, for finding a good linear combination of ranking "experts." We use the ordering algorith...

Keyphrases

order thing    preference function    conventional mean    restrictive assumption    simple greedy algorithm    form pref    many application    good approximation    ordering algorith    good linear combination    preference judgment    two-stage approach    hedge algorithm    learned preference function    new instance    on-line learning algorithm   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University