• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

A Survey and Comparison of Peer-to-Peer Overlay Network Schemes (2005)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [www-kiv.zcu.cz]
  • [www-kiv.zcu.cz]
  • [www-kiv.zcu.cz]
  • [www-kiv.zcu.cz]
  • [grothoff.org]
  • [www.ic.unicamp.br]
  • [www.cs.ucy.ac.cy]
  • [ce.sharif.edu]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [csis.pace.edu]
  • [www.csee.usf.edu]
  • [grothoff.org]
  • [www.ic.unicamp.br]
  • [ce.sharif.edu]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [www.inf.ufsc.br]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Eng Keong Lua , Jon Crowcroft , Marcelo Pias , Ravi Sharma , Steven Lim
Venue:IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
Citations:302 - 1 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Lua05asurvey,
    author = {Eng Keong Lua and Jon Crowcroft and Marcelo Pias and Ravi Sharma and Steven Lim},
    title = {A Survey and Comparison of Peer-to-Peer Overlay Network Schemes},
    journal = {IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS},
    year = {2005},
    volume = {7},
    pages = {72--93}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Over the Internet today, computing and communications environments are significantly more complex and chaotic than classical distributed systems, lacking any centralized organization or hierarchical control. There has been much interest in emerging Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network overlays because they provide a good substrate for creating large-scale data sharing, content distribution and application-level multicast applications. These P2P networks try to provide a long list of features such as: selection of nearby peers, redundant storage, efficient search/location of data items, data permanence or guarantees, hierarchical naming, trust and authentication, and, anonymity. P2P networks potentially offer an efficient routing architecture that is self-organizing, massively scalable, and robust in the wide-area, combining fault tolerance, load balancing and explicit notion of locality. In this paper, we present a survey and comparison of various Structured and Unstructured P2P networks. We categorize the various schemes into these two groups in the design spectrum and discuss the application-level network performance of each group.

Keyphrases

peer-to-peer overlay network scheme    p2p network    hierarchical control    communication environment    classical distributed system    hierarchical naming    data item    various structured    unstructured p2p network    internet today    application-level network performance    content distribution    efficient routing architecture    various scheme    application-level multicast application    centralized organization    redundant storage    fault tolerance    load balancing    design spectrum    efficient search location    much interest    long list    nearby peer    explicit notion    good substrate    data permanence    large-scale data sharing    network overlay   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University