• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Machine recognition of human activities: A survey (2008)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cfar.umd.edu]
  • [www.cfar.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.ucf.edu]
  • [www.umiacs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cfar.umd.edu]
  • [www.umiacs.umd.edu]
  • [www.public.asu.edu]
  • [www.public.asu.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Pavan Turaga , Rama Chellappa , V. S. Subrahmanian , Octavian Udrea
Citations:218 - 0 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Turaga08machinerecognition,
    author = {Pavan Turaga and Rama Chellappa and V. S. Subrahmanian and Octavian Udrea},
    title = {Machine recognition of human activities: A survey },
    year = {2008}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a rapid proliferation of video cameras in all walks of life and has resulted in a tremendous explosion of video content. Several applications such as content-based video annotation and retrieval, highlight extraction and video summarization require recognition of the activities occurring in the video. The analysis of human activities in videos is an area with increasingly important consequences from security and surveillance to entertainment and personal archiving. Several challenges at various levels of processing—robustness against errors in low-level processing, view and rate-invariant representations at midlevel processing and semantic representation of human activities at higher level processing—make this problem hard to solve. In this review paper, we present a comprehensive survey of efforts in the past couple of decades to address the problems of representation, recognition, and learning of human activities from video and related applications. We discuss the problem at two major levels of complexity: 1) “actions ” and 2) “activities. ” “Actions ” are characterized by simple motion patterns typically executed by a single human. “Activities ” are more complex and involve coordinated actions among a small number of humans. We will discuss several approaches and classify them according to their ability to handle varying degrees of complexity as interpreted above. We begin with a discussion of approaches to model the simplest of action classes known as atomic or primitive actions that do not require sophisticated dynamical modeling. Then, methods to model actions with more complex dynamics are discussed. The discussion then leads naturally to methods for higher level representation of complex activities.

Keyphrases

human activity    machine recognition    several application    review paper    primitive action    major level    simple motion pattern    several challenge    single human    several approach    personal archiving    semantic representation    low-level processing    action class    midlevel processing    rapid proliferation    related application    past couple    video content    level representation    video camera    small number    tremendous explosion    various level    video summarization    complex dynamic    content-based video annotation    sophisticated dynamical modeling    comprehensive survey    complex activity    important consequence    highlight extraction    rate-invariant representation    past decade   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University