• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Matching data dissemination algorithms to application requirements (2003)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [www.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [www.cs.ucf.edu]
  • [www.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [www.cs.ucf.edu]
  • [www.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [ftp.isi.edu]
  • [people.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [www.isi.edu]
  • [www.comet.columbia.edu]
  • [ftp.isi.edu]
  • [www.isi.edu]
  • [cens.ucla.edu]
  • [www.isi.edu]
  • [lecs.cs.ucla.edu]
  • [research.cens.ucla.edu]
  • [www.isi.edu]
  • [www.isi.edu]
  • [www.ece.rutgers.edu]
  • [www.diku.dk]
  • [web.ohmage.org]
  • [ftp.isi.edu]
  • [www.stanford.edu]
  • [ftp.isi.edu]
  • [www.ece.rutgers.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by John Heidemann , Fabio Silva , Deborah Estrin
Venue:IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SENSYS CONFERENCE
Citations:112 - 19 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Heidemann03matchingdata,
    author = {John Heidemann and Fabio Silva and Deborah Estrin},
    title = {Matching data dissemination algorithms to application requirements},
    booktitle = {IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SENSYS CONFERENCE},
    year = {2003},
    pages = {218--229},
    publisher = {ACM Press}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

A distinguishing characteristic of wireless sensor networks is the opportunity to exploit characteristics of the application at lower layers. This approach is encouraged by device resource constraints, and acceptable because devices are inexpensive and numerous enough that they can be dedicated to specific applications. Many data dissemination protocols have been proposed for multi-hop communication in sensor networks, each evaluated in some scenario. The premise of this paper is that, if protocols are designed to exploit application requirements, then no one protocol can be optimized for all applications. Instead, a family of protocols are needed, with guidance to match protocol to application. We show through field experiments with two tracking applications that choice of diffusion algorithm can affect application performance by 40–60%. These applications motivate the design of two new diffusion algorithms: pull and one-phase push diffusion. We describe these algorithms in comparison to previous algorithms, then systematically explore their performance as the number of sinks and sources, the traffic rate and node placement varies, and with and without geographic proximity in node placement and with and without geographically scoped communication. We characterize algorithm performance and highlight the effect of the choice of algorithm parameters. The end result of this work are guidelines to help application developers to match dissemination algorithms to application performance requirements.

Keyphrases

application requirement    data dissemination algorithm    sensor network    end result    node placement varies    many data dissemination protocol    previous algorithm    traffic rate    node placement    application developer    application performance    specific application    algorithm performance    new diffusion algorithm    field experiment    diffusion algorithm    device resource constraint    application performance requirement    geographic proximity    wireless sensor network    algorithm parameter    one protocol    multi-hop communication    one-phase push diffusion    dissemination algorithm   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University