• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Universal Voting Protocol Tweaks to Make Manipulation Hard (2003)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www-2.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [ftp.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [users.cs.duke.edu]
  • [repository.cmu.edu]
  • [dli.iiit.ac.in]
  • [ijcai.org]
  • [ijcai.org]
  • [ijcai.org]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Vincent Conitzer , Tuomas Sandholm
Citations:112 - 23 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Conitzer03universalvoting,
    author = {Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm},
    title = {Universal Voting Protocol Tweaks to Make Manipulation Hard},
    year = {2003}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Voting is a general method for preference aggregation in multiagent settings, but seminal results have shown that all (nondictatorial) voting protocols are manipulable. One could try to avoid manipulation by using voting protocols where determining a beneficial manipulation is hard computationally.

Keyphrases

manipulation hard    universal voting protocol tweak    voting protocol    preference aggregation    multiagent setting    seminal result    general method    beneficial manipulation   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University