• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

DMCA

Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems (1992)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [cgis.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [cgis.cs.umd.edu]
  • [theory.csail.mit.edu]
  • [theory.lcs.mit.edu]
  • [people.csail.mit.edu]
  • [theory.lcs.mit.edu]
  • [theory.lcs.mit.edu]
  • [people.csail.mit.edu]
  • [ftp.cs.princeton.edu]
  • [theory.stanford.edu]
  • [eccc.hpi-web.de]
  • [www.cs.princeton.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Sanjeev Arora , Carsten Lund , Rajeev Motwani , Madhu Sudan , Mario Szegedy
Venue:IN PROC. 33RD ANN. IEEE SYMP. ON FOUND. OF COMP. SCI
Citations:796 - 39 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Arora92proofverification,
    author = {Sanjeev Arora and Carsten Lund and Rajeev Motwani and Madhu Sudan and Mario Szegedy},
    title = {Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems},
    booktitle = {IN PROC. 33RD ANN. IEEE SYMP. ON FOUND. OF COMP. SCI},
    year = {1992},
    pages = {14--23},
    publisher = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

We show that every language in NP has a probablistic verifier that checks membership proofs for it using logarithmic number of random bits and by examining a constant number of bits in the proof. If a string is in the language, then there exists a proof such that the verifier accepts with probability 1 (i.e., for every choice of its random string). For strings not in the language, the verifier rejects every provided “proof " with probability at least 1/2. Our result builds upon and improves a recent result of Arora and Safra [6] whose verifiers examine a nonconstant number of bits in the proof (though this number is a very slowly growing function of the input length). As a consequence we prove that no MAX SNP-hard problem has a polynomial time approximation scheme, unless NP=P. The class MAX SNP was defined by Papadimitriou and Yannakakis [82] and hard problems for this class include vertex cover, maximum satisfiability, maximum cut, metric TSP, Steiner trees and shortest superstring. We also improve upon the clique hardness results of Feige, Goldwasser, Lovász, Safra and Szegedy [42], and Arora and Safra [6] and shows that there exists a positive ɛ such that approximating the maximum clique size in an N-vertex graph to within a factor of N ɛ is NP-hard.

Keyphrases

approximation problem    proof verification    constant number    maximum clique size    lov sz    provided proof    random bit    max snp-hard problem    nonconstant number    n-vertex graph    maximum cut    hard problem    maximum satisfiability    polynomial time approximation scheme    steiner tree    random string    input length    probablistic verifier    clique hardness result    class max snp    recent result    membership proof    logarithmic number    metric tsp    vertex cover   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University