• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

VoteBox: a tamper-evident, verifiable electronic voting system

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.rice.edu]
  • [secappdev.org]
  • [www.secappdev.org]
  • [www.secappdev.org]
  • [dsandler.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [www.usenix.org]
  • [fuxi.cs.txstate.edu]
  • [www.usenix.org]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Daniel Sandler , Kyle Derr , Dan S. Wallach
Citations:37 - 5 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Sandler_votebox:a,
    author = {Daniel Sandler and Kyle Derr and Dan S. Wallach},
    title = {VoteBox: a tamper-evident, verifiable electronic voting system },
    year = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Commercial electronic voting systems have experienced many high-profile software, hardware, and usability failures in real elections. While it is tempting to abandon electronic voting altogether, we show how a careful application of distributed systems and cryptographic techniques can yield voting systems that surpass current systems and their analog forebears in trustworthiness and usability. We have developed the VoteBox, a complete electronic voting system that combines several recent e-voting research results into a coherent whole that can provide strong end-to-end security guarantees to voters. VoteBox machines are locally networked and all critical election events are broadcast and recorded by every machine on the network. VoteBox network data, including encrypted votes, can be safely relayed to the outside world in real time, allowing independent observers with personal computers to validate the system as it is running. We also allow any voter to challenge a VoteBox, while the election is ongoing, to produce proof that ballots are cast as intended. The VoteBox design offers a number of pragmatic benefits that can help reduce the frequency and impact of poll worker or voter errors.

Keyphrases

verifiable electronic voting system    cryptographic technique    coherent whole    votebox network data    poll worker    several recent e-voting research result    many high-profile software    votebox machine    careful application    distributed system    votebox design    voter error    real time    outside world    usability failure    personal computer    complete electronic voting system    strong end-to-end security guarantee    surpass current system    independent observer    pragmatic benefit    analog forebear    real election    critical election event    electronic voting   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University