The use of visual feedback during signing: Evidence from signers with impaired vision (2009)
Venue: | Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |
Citations: | 2 - 1 self |
Citations
1293 |
Speaking: From intention to articulation
- Levelt
- 1989
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...Alvarado Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92120 (e-mail: kemmorey@mail.sdsu.edu). The perceptual loop theory of self-monitoring posits that auditory speech output is parsed by the comprehension system (=-=Levelt, 1989-=-; Postma, 2000). According to this theory, a centralized monitor is located in the conceptual processing system and receives input from both an inner (prearticulatory) loop and an outer (auditory) loo... |
417 |
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
- Pickering, J, et al.
- 2004
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...nel vision produced signs within an even more restricted signing space when conversing in a dialogue. We speculate that this additional reduction in signing space may result from a form of alignment (=-=Pickering & Garrod, 2004-=-), in which both participants in the dialogue align with respect to the size of signing space. That is, the normally sighted signer must sign within a restricted space near the face in order for the s... |
148 | Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation
- Masson, Loftus
- 2003
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). For all analyses, variability is reported with repeated-measures 95% confidence interval (CI) half-widths based on single degree-offreedom comparisons (=-=Masson & Loftus, 2003-=-). Results The results are shown in Figure 2. The mixed design repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a main effect of group, F(2, 12) 5 6.306, p 5 .013, CI 5616.47. The Tukey’s Honestly Significant Differe... |
147 |
Accommodation theory: Communication context and consequence. In
- Giles, Coupland, et al.
- 1991
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...er interlocutor as a type of phonetic alignment. Both participants in the dialogue converge on a restricted signing space near the face. Just as speakers align with respect to accent and speech rate (=-=Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991-=-; Giles & Powesland, 1975), signers may align with respect to the size of signing space.Visual Feedback During Signing 103 For the blind signers, the size of signing space during conversation did not... |
130 |
Speech style and social evaluation.
- Giles, Powesland
- 1975
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ic alignment. Both participants in the dialogue converge on a restricted signing space near the face. Just as speakers align with respect to accent and speech rate (Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991; =-=Giles & Powesland, 1975-=-), signers may align with respect to the size of signing space.Visual Feedback During Signing 103 For the blind signers, the size of signing space during conversation did not differ from that of norm... |
87 | Detection of errors during speech production. A review of speech monitoring models
- Postma
- 2000
(Show Context)
Citation Context ... Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92120 (e-mail: kemmorey@mail.sdsu.edu). The perceptual loop theory of self-monitoring posits that auditory speech output is parsed by the comprehension system (Levelt, 1989; =-=Postma, 2000-=-). According to this theory, a centralized monitor is located in the conceptual processing system and receives input from both an inner (prearticulatory) loop and an outer (auditory) loop. The outer p... |
18 |
The production and detection of speech errors in silent, mouthed, noise-masked, and normal auditory feedback speech
- Postma, Noordanus
- 1996
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...rentially on proprioceptive monitoring. The fact that speakers detect fewer errors during mouthed speech than during voiced speech indicates that they do not rely solely on proprioceptive monitoring (=-=Postma & Noordanus, 1996-=-). Auditory feedback provides essential information about acoustic properties of self-produced speech that is not available through proprioception, such as voicing or nasalization. Postma (2000) hypot... |
16 |
Roles of efference monitoring in the detection of selfproduced speech errors
- Lackner, Tuller
- 1979
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...(e.g., critical information about nonmanual markers is absent). Our results also provide support for psycholinguistic models that posit a role for proprioceptive feedback for monitoring speech (e.g., =-=Lackner & Tuller, 1979-=-). It is likely, however, that signers and speakers rely differentially on proprioceptive monitoring. The fact that speakers detect fewer errors during mouthed speech than during voiced speech indicat... |
12 | The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
- Bosworth, Dobkins
- 2002
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...t the hands from continually disappearing and reappearing within the visual field. Deaf signers are particularly sensitive to objects moving in and out of the visual periphery (Bavelier et al., 2000; =-=Bosworth & Dobkins, 2001-=-), and therefore, those with tunnel vision might adjust the size of signing space to avoid such visually distracting input. However, recently Arena, Finlay, and Woll (2007) found that normally sighted... |
7 |
What happens in Tactile ASL? In
- Collins, Petronio
- 1998
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...hted signers. The image of the signer with Usher syndrome is reproduced with permission from the video Deaf-Blind Getting Involved: A Conversation, produced by Sign Media, Inc., Ó1992 Theresa Smith. (=-=Collins & Petronio, 1998-=-; Petronio, 1988; Petronio & Dively, 2006). When deaf-blind signers communicate with a normally sighted signer, they produce ‘‘visual’’ ASL but perceive tactile ASL using the hand-on-hand method of si... |
5 | The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: a kinematic study with deaf signers - Emmorey, Gertsberg, et al. - 2009 |
4 | Seeing sign: The relationship of visual feedback to sign language sentence structure - Arena, Finlay, et al. - 2007 |
3 |
The effects of auditory and visual interference on speech and sign
- Siegel, Clay, et al.
- 1992
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...inating the visual periphery reduces the size of signing space (particularly within the vertical dimension), but completely removing visual feedback does not alter the size of signing space (see also =-=Siegel, Clay, & Naeve, 1992-=-). These data suggest that visual feedback plays at least some role during sign production. A potential reason for signing near the face is to prevent the hands from continually disappearing and reapp... |
2 | presented at CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, La Jolla, CA. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14:1 Winter 2009 - Poster - 2000 |
2 |
Interpreting for deaf-blind students: Factors to consider
- Petronio
- 1988
(Show Context)
Citation Context ... the signer with Usher syndrome is reproduced with permission from the video Deaf-Blind Getting Involved: A Conversation, produced by Sign Media, Inc., Ó1992 Theresa Smith. (Collins & Petronio, 1998; =-=Petronio, 1988-=-; Petronio & Dively, 2006). When deaf-blind signers communicate with a normally sighted signer, they produce ‘‘visual’’ ASL but perceive tactile ASL using the hand-on-hand method of sign perception. T... |