Citation Context

...der, Batista, & Andersen, 1997; Kalaska & Crammond, 1995). We have provided novel evidence supporting the notion that while the superior parietal lobule combines somatosensory and visual information, the dorsal precentral gyrus generates motor plans, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. METHODS Six healthy, young (25 ± 2 years) men participated in the study after giving written informed consent according to institutional guidelines of the local ethics committee (CMO region Arnhem–Nijmegen, Netherlands). All participants were right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, Oldfield, 1971; 90 ± 10%, mean ± SD). Tasks We used two tasks, an MI and a VI task. Four line drawings of hands (left or right hand, viewed either from the back or from the palm) served as stimuli for the MI task. Four typographical characters (F, G, J, and R, in Times New Roman font) served as stimuli for the VI task. Each of these eight stimuli was rotated around the vertical axis of the picture to generate mirror images. Further clockwise rotations in the plane of the picture [from an upright position (08) until a rotation of 1808 in six steps of 308] generated two sets of 56 stimuli each (Figure 1A). Th...

Citation Context

...cts were drawn (Friston, Holmes, Price, et al., 1999; Friston, Holmes, & Worsley, 1999). Consistency of the effects across subjects was ensured via multisubject conjunction analyses (Friston, Holmes, Price, et al., 1999). The statistical analysis of the fMRI data adopted a mass univariate approach, and the inferences pertain to the voxel level, with an arbitrarily chosen ER of 1% ( p threshold = .01; Z threshold = 3.84). This approach introduces a multiple comparisons problem. Here we have corrected for performing multiple tests over the whole brain by using the False Discovery Rate approach (Genovese, Lazar, & Nichols, 2002). In addition to the procedure described above, in one particular instance, we have constrained our inferences on the basis of independent anatomical information, using a VOI approach. In this case, we aimed at testing whether the present dataset revealed any significant rotation-related activity in cortical regions previously implicated in supporting movement representations during ‘‘delayed’’ motor responses (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Accordingly, we relied on published stereotactical coordinates to position VOIs along the superior temporal regio...

Citation Context

...s show no first- or second-order rotation-related effects in either of the two tasks, and overlapping effects of task. DISCUSSION In this study, we have used implicit MI as at tool to investigate neural activity related to planning hand movements, yet independent from sensory or motoric events. In the following sections, we discuss our behavioral and neural findings, focusing on fronto-parietal responses and their interactions with occipito-temporal activity. We conclude by elaborating on the relevance of these findings for current models of action planning (Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 2002; Hommel, Musseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Behavioral Performance We have used a mental rotation paradigm to induce MI and VI (Kosslyn, 1996). The tasks were performed with low ERs, indicating that the subjects were effectively engaged in the imagery tests. The RT profiles changed as a function of rotation (Figure 1B), indicating that the subjects used mental rotation to judge the laterality of hands (MI task) and letters (VI task). The rotationrelated modulation of performance differed across tasks, indicating that mental rotation in MI engaged additional resources as compared to VI. Subjects’ posture infl...

Citation Context

...on of actions may not generalize to movement planning of immediate actions, given that actions were simulated and not carried out. Subjects were presented with drawings of hands and asked to report whether they were seeing a left hand or a right hand, regardless of the angle of rotation of each stimulus from its upright position. We paired this MI task with a visual imagery (VI) control task in which subjects were presented with typographical characters and asked to report whether they were seeing a canonical letter or its mirror image, regardless of its rotation (Alivisatos & Petrides, 1997; Shepard & Cooper, 1982). During task performance, we measured behavioral performance and neural activity with fast event-related fMRI (Friston, Zarahn, Josephs, Henson, & Dale, 1999). This experimental design allowed us to distinguish responses parametrically related to MI from responses evoked by VI and other task-related phenomena. Crucially, during each trial, we distinguished between neural activity associated with different components, namely, stimulusrelated activity, mental rotation-related activity, and residual response-related activity. We performed two separate control experiments. We investigated the inf...

Citation Context

...p. 97–112 tations from movement execution without forcing delays in the sensorimotor process, we have appealed to the concept of implicit motor imagery (MI). Several psychophysical studies (Parsons, 1987, 1994; Sekiyama, 1982) have demonstrated that human subjects, when asked to judge the laterality of a rotated image of a hand, solve this task by imagining their own hand moving from its current position into the stimulus orientation for comparison. Here we have used MI as a ‘‘tool’’ to drive subjects to manipulate movement representations, defined as internal models of the goal of an action (Jeannerod, 1994). In this perspective, our manipulation is likely to evoke internal simulation of actions for the purpose of selecting the most biomechanically appealing movement plan, thus allowing for the computation and refinement of the premotor plan (Johnson, Rote, et al., 2002; Johnson, 2000). It is important to note, however, that behavioral and neural correlates of internal simulation of actions may not generalize to movement planning of immediate actions, given that actions were simulated and not carried out. Subjects were presented with drawings of hands and asked to report whether they were seeing ...

Citation Context

....0 mm; 176 sagittal slices; FOV = 256 mm). Image Analysis Image analysis was performed with SPM99 (Statistical Parametric Mapping, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). Functional images were spatially realigned using a sinc interpolation algorithm that estimates rigid body transformations (translations, rotations) by minimizing head movements between each image and the reference image (Friston, Ashburner, et al., 1995). Subsequently, the time series for each voxel was realigned temporally to acquisition of the middle slice. Images were normalized to a standard EPI template centered in Talairach space (Ashburner & Friston, 1999) by using 12 linear parameters (translation, rotation, zoom, and shear) and subsampled at an isotropic voxel size of 2 mm. The normalized images were smoothed with an isotropic 10-mm full-widthat-half-maximum (FWHM) gaussian kernel. Anatomical images were spatially coregistered to the mean of the functional images (Ashburner & Friston, 1997) and spatially normalized by using the same transformation matrix applied to the functional images. The statistical model consisted of independent partitions accounting for different sources of variance on a trial-by-trial basis (i.e., we used an event-rela...

Citation Context

...olly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus presentation (Goo...

Citation Context

...implicit MI as at tool to investigate neural activity related to planning hand movements, yet independent from sensory or motoric events. In the following sections, we discuss our behavioral and neural findings, focusing on fronto-parietal responses and their interactions with occipito-temporal activity. We conclude by elaborating on the relevance of these findings for current models of action planning (Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 2002; Hommel, Musseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Behavioral Performance We have used a mental rotation paradigm to induce MI and VI (Kosslyn, 1996). The tasks were performed with low ERs, indicating that the subjects were effectively engaged in the imagery tests. The RT profiles changed as a function of rotation (Figure 1B), indicating that the subjects used mental rotation to judge the laterality of hands (MI task) and letters (VI task). The rotationrelated modulation of performance differed across tasks, indicating that mental rotation in MI engaged additional resources as compared to VI. Subjects’ posture influenced the RT profile during the MI task, but not during the VI task (Figure 1C), in line with the results of a previous study ...

Citation Context

...yrus L 4.38 38 84 16 R 5.88 42 78 12 Intra-occipital sulcus R 6.39 24 94 16 Fusiform gyrus R 6.34 32 52 24 Postcentral sulcus L 6.59 44 38 52 Frontal operculum L 4.22 38 14 6 Anterior cingulate sulcus L 4.04 2 14 48 R 4.48 4 16 46 Hippocampus (tail) L 3.90 28 40 0 R 4.85 22 40 4 Cerebellum (culmen) L 4.16 4 54 10 R 6.18 18 50 22 Cerebellum (declive) L 4.87 6 76 22 Cerebellum (centralis) R 4.29 8 42 28 MIs > VIs Calcarine sulcus R 5.39 18 94 2 Middle occipital gyrus R 5.13 32 94 8 102 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 17, Number 1 volved in inhibitory control (Garavan, Ross, & Stein, 1999; Konishi et al., 1999). Rotation-related Activity (MIp, VIp): Hemodynamic Response Figure 3A–C illustrates the strong increase in activity in occipito-temporal cortex with increasing stimulus rotation (despite the absence of any physical or illusory motion of the visual stimuli). Figure 3G–I illustrates the response modulation of the putative left frontal eye field. It can be seen that the activity of this precentral cluster increases with increasing rotation equally during both VI and MI tasks. Figure 3J–N illustrates the responses evoked in portions of the left parietal and premotor cortex,...

Citation Context

... 42 78 12 Intra-occipital sulcus R 6.39 24 94 16 Fusiform gyrus R 6.34 32 52 24 Postcentral sulcus L 6.59 44 38 52 Frontal operculum L 4.22 38 14 6 Anterior cingulate sulcus L 4.04 2 14 48 R 4.48 4 16 46 Hippocampus (tail) L 3.90 28 40 0 R 4.85 22 40 4 Cerebellum (culmen) L 4.16 4 54 10 R 6.18 18 50 22 Cerebellum (declive) L 4.87 6 76 22 Cerebellum (centralis) R 4.29 8 42 28 MIs > VIs Calcarine sulcus R 5.39 18 94 2 Middle occipital gyrus R 5.13 32 94 8 102 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 17, Number 1 volved in inhibitory control (Garavan, Ross, & Stein, 1999; Konishi et al., 1999). Rotation-related Activity (MIp, VIp): Hemodynamic Response Figure 3A–C illustrates the strong increase in activity in occipito-temporal cortex with increasing stimulus rotation (despite the absence of any physical or illusory motion of the visual stimuli). Figure 3G–I illustrates the response modulation of the putative left frontal eye field. It can be seen that the activity of this precentral cluster increases with increasing rotation equally during both VI and MI tasks. Figure 3J–N illustrates the responses evoked in portions of the left parietal and premotor cortex, showing differential r...

Citation Context

...tative behavior (Decety et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Accordingly, our findings provide further support for the hypothesis that delayed actions and immediate responses rely on different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Conclusions We have characterized topography and content of neural correlates of action planning, and dissociated them from neural responses to external events by virtue of an implicit MI task. We have confirmed that posterior parietal and precentral regions are involved in specifying intended actions (Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001; Snyder, Batista, & Andersen, 1997; Kalaska & Crammond, 1995). We have provided novel evidence supporting the notion that while the superior parietal lobule combines somatosensory and visual information, the dorsal precentral gyrus generates motor plans, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. METHODS Six healthy, young (25 ± 2 years) men participated in the study after giving written informed consent according to institutional guidelines of the local ethics committee (CMO region Arnhem–Nijmegen, Netherlands). All participants were right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, Oldfield, 1971; 90 ± 10%, mean...

Citation Context

...gression analysis. The null hypothesis was that the variance explained by a given regressor was consistent with the residual error, once the variance explained by the other components of the model was accounted for. Linear compounds (contrasts) were used to determine the effects associated with each task component, generating t-values for each voxel in the image, that is, statistical parametric maps of t-values (SPM{t}s). In particular, for each of the three orthogonal task dimensions detailed above, we further distinguished between regions showing either common activity (indicated by ‘‘\’’) (Friston, Holmes, Price, Buchel, & Worsley, 1999) or differential activity (indicated by ‘‘>’’) across levels of a given experimental factor. This rationale generated the following series of contrasts: (a) Stimulus-related activity: MIs > VIs; MIs \ VIs; VIs > MIs. (b) Rotation-related activity: MIp > VIp; MIp \ VIp; VIp > MIp. (c) Response-related activity: MIr > VIr; MIr \ VIr; VIr > MIr. These contrast images indicate the spatial distribution of significant activity for a given task component. Gaussian field theory allowed us to make inferences corrected for the number of nonindependent comparisons (Friston, Holmes, Worsley, Poline, et a...

Citation Context

...nissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus...

Citation Context

...There has been mixed evidence concerning the involvement of the premotor and motor cortex in imagery tasks (Gerardin et al., 2000; Richter, Somorjai, et al., 2000; Carpenter, Just, Keller, Eddy, & Thulborn, 1999; Bonda, Petrides, Frey, & Evans, 1995). By disambiguating imagery-related signals from activity associated with residual variability in response times, here we could functionally differentiate between prefrontal, central, and precentral activities. Neural activity at the junction between the superior frontal sulcus and the superior precentral gyrus (putative hFEF; Berman et al., 1999; Paus, 1996) were equally modulated by rotation in both MI and VI (Figure 3G–I). The response profile and the location of these frontal clusters are compatible with control of eye movements, rather than planning of hand movements. Conversely, the rotation-modulated precentral activity occurring during MI (Figure 3J–L) cannot be related to eye movements or visuomotor processes. It can be argued that the relative ease of VI (as parameterized by the increase in RTs as a function of rotation) might have failed to evoke significant neural responses in this region. However, although the behavioral speed of rota...

Citation Context

... in the parietal (Figure 3M–N) and precentral cortex (Figure 3J–L) fall ‘‘outside’’ the variability range of the parietal and frontal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) observed in the right inferior precentral sulcus is near (< 10 mm) a human precentral field involved in polymodal motion processing (Bremmer et al., 2001). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) found on the right middle frontal sulcus is within cytoarchitectonic-defined area 9/46 (Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995), in a region involved in response selection (Rowe, Toni, Josephs, Frackowiak, & Passingham, 2000), but distant (> 19 mm) from a right prefrontal region inTable 1. Common (MIs \ VIs) and Differential (MIs > VIs) Stimulus-related Activities Contrast Anatomical Region Hemisphere Z Score Stereotactic Coordinates MIs \ VIs Lingual gyrus L 6.04 12 82 14 R > 8 22 78 16 Inferior occipital gyrus L 4.38 38 84 16 R 5.88 42 78 12 Intra-occipital sulcus R 6.39 24 94 16 Fusiform gyrus R 6.34 32 52 24 Postcentral sulcus L 6.59 44 38 52 Frontal operculum L 4.22 38 14 6 Anterior cingulate sulcus L 4.04 2 14 48 R 4.48 4 16 46 Hippocampus (tail) L 3.90 28 40 0 R 4.85 22 40 4 Cerebellum ...

Citation Context

... the human brain. During intended action, the posterior parietal cortex combines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez,...

Citation Context

...I and VI, the regions that we claimed to be specifically involved in movement representations should show a correlation between behavioral and neural effects across subjects during MI, whereas the correlation between behavior and neural responsivity should be absent during VI. Figure 4 shows the application of this rationale in two areas showing differential rotationrelated modulation of neural activity. The functional relevance of these regions will be discussed below. Posterior Parietal Cortex In line with previous reports (Wolbers, Weiller, & Buchel, 2003; Richter, Somorjai, et al., 2000; Cohen et al., 1996), we found large portions of the IPS to be involved in mental rotation (Tables 2 and 3). By manipulating type and load of imagery, we could highlight a dorsoventral gradient of activity along the IPS. The ventral IPS clusters showed similar rotation-modulated responses during both MI and VI (Figure 3D–F). Anatomically, these clusters fall close to the human equivalents of the VIP (Bremmer et al., 2001) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP; Berman et al., 1999). Functionally, the response profiles of the ventral IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s VIP and LIP, na...

Citation Context

...k. As expected, time on-task also changed as a function of rotation, with longer RTs for larger rotations. Accordingly, the use of a fixed ITI would have caused off-task time to become a function of both task and rotation. Note that although our analysis does not rely on direct contrasts between imagery and baseline epochs, the presence of a correlation between off-task time and the experimental factors might have contaminated task- and rotation-related effects with neural phenomena occurring during the off-task time. To avoid this confound (McKiernan, Kaufman, KuceraThompson, & Binder, 2003; Binder et al., 1999), we adjusted the ITI according to the formula: ITI = C + a/p, where C = 2.0 sec (VI) or 2.5 sec (MI); a = stimulus rotation (rad). Stimulus rotation was randomized from trial to trial. At the end of each block, a fixation cross was presented for 5 sec (baseline). A transient change in size of the fixation cross announced the start of the next block of trials. The subjects were given four further blocks of training in the scanner (28 trials), just before the beginning of the scanning test. This allowed them to become familiar with the experimental setup while lying in the scanner. During the s...

Citation Context

... al., 2001) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP; Berman et al., 1999). Functionally, the response profiles of the ventral IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s VIP and LIP, namely, VIP’s sensitivity to circular optic f lows (Schaafsma & Duysens, 1996) and LIP’s involvement in saccadic eye movements (Barash, Bracewell, Fogassi, Gnadt, & Andersen, 1991). Similar rotation-modulated effects were also found in the occipito-temporal cortex (hMT+/V5; Figure 3A–C) and frontal regions (hFEF; Figure 3G–I). In the macaque, these cortical areas are connected to the VIP–LIP (Boussaoud, Ungerleider, & Desimone, 1990). Conversely, the dorsal IPS clusters showed rotationmodulated responses during MI but not during VI (Figure 3M–N). Anatomically, the position of these clusters along the human IPS is consistent with the location of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) along the IPS in the macaque (Colby, Gattass, Olson, & Gross, 1988). Functionally, the response profiles of the dorsal IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s MIP, namely, arm- and hand-centered visuoproprioceptive receptive fields (Colby, 1998). Finally, MIdependent rotation-modulated effects were found not only along t...

Citation Context

... each image and the reference image (Friston, Ashburner, et al., 1995). Subsequently, the time series for each voxel was realigned temporally to acquisition of the middle slice. Images were normalized to a standard EPI template centered in Talairach space (Ashburner & Friston, 1999) by using 12 linear parameters (translation, rotation, zoom, and shear) and subsampled at an isotropic voxel size of 2 mm. The normalized images were smoothed with an isotropic 10-mm full-widthat-half-maximum (FWHM) gaussian kernel. Anatomical images were spatially coregistered to the mean of the functional images (Ashburner & Friston, 1997) and spatially normalized by using the same transformation matrix applied to the functional images. The statistical model consisted of independent partitions accounting for different sources of variance on a trial-by-trial basis (i.e., we used an event-related design). We considered a main effect, time-locked to stimulus onset (2 levels: MI, VI) and its modulation by rotation (7 levels: 08 to 1808, in 308 steps). On the basis of the linear and quadratic trends in the behavioral data (see Results: Task Performance), we modeled neural modulation of rotation with linear and quadratic polynomial e...

Citation Context

...ever, it remains to be seen whether this finding is limited to the current experimental setup, or whether it represents a general modus operandi of the human primary motor cortex. Neural activity in the right inferior precentral sulcus increased as a function of rotation during MI, but not during VI. This response profile is compatible with the functional and anatomical characteristics of the macaque’s premotor neurons clustered in front of the spur of the arcuate sulcus, namely, arm-centered, motionsensitive visuotactile receptive fields (Graziano & Gandhi, 2000; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997; Fogassi et al., 1996). Similar properties have emerged from the human inferior precentral cortex (Bremmer et al., 2001) in a location close (< 10 mm) to the present cluster. Our findings suggest that this region might not be concerned with processing sensory stimuli per se, but rather with evaluating their relevance for preparing an adequate motor response. Neural activity along the right middle frontal sulcus (putative human 46/9; Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995) revealed MI-dependent increases in neural activity with increasing rotation. It has been argued that MI requires inhibition of overt movement (Jeannerod...

Citation Context

...ocular pursuit (Dukelow et al., 2001; Petit & Haxby, 1999). Our occipito-temporal cluster is also distant (> 28 mm) from superior temporal regions involved in performance of ‘‘delayed’’ responses, either in the context of arbitrary visuomotor associations (Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001) or in the context of imitative behavior (Decety, Chaminade, Greze, & Meltzoff, 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Furthermore, the present dataset showed no significant ( p < .05) rotationrelated signals on volumes of interest (VOIs) centered on the local maxima reported in those studies (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found bilaterally along the ‘‘ventral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (36, 40, 38; 42, 36, 44) is within variability range of the human ventral intraparietal area (VIP; Bremmer et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the ‘‘lateral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (24, 60, 54; 30, 50, 54) falls within the variability range of the human parietal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The common rotation-related activity...

Citation Context

...on while keeping the actual stimuli stationary, here we could isolate extrastriate signals independently from physical or perceived rotations of the visual stimuli. Neural activity around the occipito-temporal fissure (putative hMT+/V5; Amedi et al., 2002) showed overlapping rotation-modulated signals during both imagery tasks (Figure 3A–C). Incidentally, this result provides support to ‘‘depictive’’ accounts of VI (Kosslyn, 1996) by showing that mental rotation of ‘‘stationary’’ visual stimuli modulates neural activity in the cortex sensitive to rotational optical flow (Morrone et al., 2000; Graziano, Andersen, & Snowden, 1994). By the same token, our findings beg the question of whether and how such extrastriate activity contributes to the manipulation of action representations. Functional interactions between movement- and perceptual-related structures have been postulated by computational and cognitive models of motor control as a way to predict the sensory consequences of a planned movement (Hommel et al., 2001; Wolpert & Ghahrama106 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 17, Number 1 ni, 2000). Here we localize these perceptuo-motor interactions to frontal and occipito-temporal regions, which are both part o...

Citation Context

... The tasks were performed with low ERs, indicating that the subjects were effectively engaged in the imagery tests. The RT profiles changed as a function of rotation (Figure 1B), indicating that the subjects used mental rotation to judge the laterality of hands (MI task) and letters (VI task). The rotationrelated modulation of performance differed across tasks, indicating that mental rotation in MI engaged additional resources as compared to VI. Subjects’ posture influenced the RT profile during the MI task, but not during the VI task (Figure 1C), in line with the results of a previous study (Parsons, 1994) and suggestive of the fact that sensorimotor structures support mental rotation of Figure 4. Imaging results—relationship between behavioral and neural effects. Effect size of linear and quadratic increases in neural activity (neural effect size, in arbitrary units) across subjects as a function of linear and quadratic effect size of rotation on reaction time (behavioral effect size, in arbitrary units) during MI (gray triangles) and VI (black diamonds). Subject-by-subject variance in the behavioral rotation-related effects was positively and significantly correlated with the neural rotation-...

Citation Context

...t al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Accordingly, we relied on published stereotactical coordinates to position VOIs along the superior temporal region, and we used the FWHM of our statistical images to define the radius of the VOIs. Our goal was to exploit the higher sensitivity of VOI-based analyses to exclude that the lack of activity observed in these regions in the present study was not due to a thresholding effect. Anatomical details of significant signal changes were obtained by superimposing the SPM{t}s on the structural images of each subject. The atlases of Schmahmann et al. (1999), Duvernoy, Cabanis, and Vannson (1991), and Ono, Kubik, and Abernathey (1990) were used to identify relevant anatomical landmarks. Behavioral Analysis Mean RTs and ERs measured during the scanning test were analyzed separately and considered as independent variables of a 2 7 repeated-measures ANOVA with a main effect of task (2 levels: MI, VI) and a main effect of rotation (7 levels: 08 to 1808, in 308 steps). Subjects were considered as a random factor. Alpha level was set at p < .05, Greenhouse–Geisser corrected where applicable. Means and standard deviations of EMG signals (35 trials) we...

Citation Context

...ry, 2002), and close (< 7 mm) to a cortical field that selectively responds to circular flow motion (Morrone et al., 2000). Our occipito-temporal cluster is distant (> 12 mm) from regions involved in ocular pursuit (Dukelow et al., 2001; Petit & Haxby, 1999). Our occipito-temporal cluster is also distant (> 28 mm) from superior temporal regions involved in performance of ‘‘delayed’’ responses, either in the context of arbitrary visuomotor associations (Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001) or in the context of imitative behavior (Decety, Chaminade, Greze, & Meltzoff, 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Furthermore, the present dataset showed no significant ( p < .05) rotationrelated signals on volumes of interest (VOIs) centered on the local maxima reported in those studies (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found bilaterally along the ‘‘ventral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (36, 40, 38; 42, 36, 44) is within variability range of the human ventral intraparietal area (VIP; Bremmer et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the ‘‘lat...

Citation Context

...ferior precentral sulcus, the right anterior cingulate sulcus, and the right middle frontal sulcus. At lower statistical threshold ( p < .05 corrected), there were responses along the cerebellar vermis (4, 62, 32). There was no stronger rotationrelated activity during VI than MI (VIs > MIs). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found along the occipito-temporal fissure (Figure 3A–C) is near (< 9 mm) hMT+/V5, the human visual motion complex (Amedi, Jacobson, Hendler, Malach, & Zohary, 2002), and close (< 7 mm) to a cortical field that selectively responds to circular flow motion (Morrone et al., 2000). Our occipito-temporal cluster is distant (> 12 mm) from regions involved in ocular pursuit (Dukelow et al., 2001; Petit & Haxby, 1999). Our occipito-temporal cluster is also distant (> 28 mm) from superior temporal regions involved in performance of ‘‘delayed’’ responses, either in the context of arbitrary visuomotor associations (Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001) or in the context of imitative behavior (Decety, Chaminade, Greze, & Meltzoff, 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Furthermore, the present dataset showed no significant ( p < .05) rotationrelated signals on volum...

Citation Context

...an et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) found in the parietal (Figure 3M–N) and precentral cortex (Figure 3J–L) fall ‘‘outside’’ the variability range of the parietal and frontal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) observed in the right inferior precentral sulcus is near (< 10 mm) a human precentral field involved in polymodal motion processing (Bremmer et al., 2001). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) found on the right middle frontal sulcus is within cytoarchitectonic-defined area 9/46 (Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995), in a region involved in response selection (Rowe, Toni, Josephs, Frackowiak, & Passingham, 2000), but distant (> 19 mm) from a right prefrontal region inTable 1. Common (MIs \ VIs) and Differential (MIs > VIs) Stimulus-related Activities Contrast Anatomical Region Hemisphere Z Score Stereotactic Coordinates MIs \ VIs Lingual gyrus L 6.04 12 82 14 R > 8 22 78 16 Inferior occipital gyrus L 4.38 38 84 16 R 5.88 42 78 12 Intra-occipital sulcus R 6.39 24 94 16 Fusiform gyrus R 6.34 32 52 24 Postcentral sulcus L 6.59 44 38 52 Frontal operculum L 4.22 38 14 6 Anterior cingulate sulc...

Citation Context

...posterior parietal cortex combines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). ...

Citation Context

...ext of imitative behavior (Decety, Chaminade, Greze, & Meltzoff, 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Furthermore, the present dataset showed no significant ( p < .05) rotationrelated signals on volumes of interest (VOIs) centered on the local maxima reported in those studies (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found bilaterally along the ‘‘ventral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (36, 40, 38; 42, 36, 44) is within variability range of the human ventral intraparietal area (VIP; Bremmer et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the ‘‘lateral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (24, 60, 54; 30, 50, 54) falls within the variability range of the human parietal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the superior precentral gyri (28, 8, 48; 22, 12, 48; see Figure 3) falls within the variability range of the human frontal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) found in the parietal (Figure 3M–N) and precentral cortex (Figure 3J–L) fall ‘‘outside’’ th...

Citation Context

...ther than motor planning. However, it remains to be seen whether this finding is limited to the current experimental setup, or whether it represents a general modus operandi of the human primary motor cortex. Neural activity in the right inferior precentral sulcus increased as a function of rotation during MI, but not during VI. This response profile is compatible with the functional and anatomical characteristics of the macaque’s premotor neurons clustered in front of the spur of the arcuate sulcus, namely, arm-centered, motionsensitive visuotactile receptive fields (Graziano & Gandhi, 2000; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997; Fogassi et al., 1996). Similar properties have emerged from the human inferior precentral cortex (Bremmer et al., 2001) in a location close (< 10 mm) to the present cluster. Our findings suggest that this region might not be concerned with processing sensory stimuli per se, but rather with evaluating their relevance for preparing an adequate motor response. Neural activity along the right middle frontal sulcus (putative human 46/9; Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995) revealed MI-dependent increases in neural activity with increasing rotation. It has been argued that MI requires inhibition of ov...

Citation Context

... of dorsal precentral activity is null during VI but robust during MI (Figure 3J). Furthermore, despite the sizeable overlap in the behavioral rotation-related effects evoked in individual subjects during MI and VI, this precentral region revealed a significant and positive correlation between behavioral and neural rotationrelated effects during MI, but not during VI (Figure 4B). Therefore, it is likely that that the precentral response is specifically related to the generation of ‘‘motor plans.’’ Electrical stimulation of the macaque’s precentral gyrus can evoke complex upper-limb movements (Graziano, Taylor, & Moore, 2002). Here we confirm and extend those findings by having stimulated human precentral neurons through imagined movements rather than electrical currents. Neural activity around the knob of the central sulcus (hand region of M1 and S1; Maldjian et al., 1999; SastreJaner et al., 1998) was significantly correlated with the actual motor responses, but it neither showed any relationship with stimulus rotation, nor did it distinguish between MI and VI. This result indicates that, at the mesoscopic level of analysis of fMRI, the putative primary motor cortex deals with movement execution, rather than mo...

Citation Context

...ly, the integration of limb-related visual and somatosensory information. It has been shown how the superior parietal lobule combines these sensory inputs for coding static arm position (Graziano, Cooke, & Taylor, 2000). Here, de Lange, Hagoort, and Toni 105 we extend the scope of those findings to ‘‘dynamic’’ motor cognitive processes, localizing the effect to the dorsal portion of the middle third of the human IPS. Frontal Cortex There has been mixed evidence concerning the involvement of the premotor and motor cortex in imagery tasks (Gerardin et al., 2000; Richter, Somorjai, et al., 2000; Carpenter, Just, Keller, Eddy, & Thulborn, 1999; Bonda, Petrides, Frey, & Evans, 1995). By disambiguating imagery-related signals from activity associated with residual variability in response times, here we could functionally differentiate between prefrontal, central, and precentral activities. Neural activity at the junction between the superior frontal sulcus and the superior precentral gyrus (putative hFEF; Berman et al., 1999; Paus, 1996) were equally modulated by rotation in both MI and VI (Figure 3G–I). The response profile and the location of these frontal clusters are compatible with control of eye movements, rather than planning ...

Citation Context

...trol (Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999). However, those responses are distant (> 19 mm) from our site. Rather, the activity found in this area (46/9) is compatible with the role of this region in selecting between competing responses (Hadland et al., 2001; Rowe et al., 2000), that is, selection of the appropriate hand and corresponding covert movement during the MI task. Occipito-Temporal Cortex Previous studies have shown that extrastriate activity correlates with subjects’ perceptual experience, independently from the characteristics of the sensory inputs (Nichols & Newsome, 2002; Tootell et al., 1995). By manipulating the amount of mental rotation while keeping the actual stimuli stationary, here we could isolate extrastriate signals independently from physical or perceived rotations of the visual stimuli. Neural activity around the occipito-temporal fissure (putative hMT+/V5; Amedi et al., 2002) showed overlapping rotation-modulated signals during both imagery tasks (Figure 3A–C). Incidentally, this result provides support to ‘‘depictive’’ accounts of VI (Kosslyn, 1996) by showing that mental rotation of ‘‘stationary’’ visual stimuli modulates neural activity in the cortex sensitive to ro...

Citation Context

...ery, we could highlight a dorsoventral gradient of activity along the IPS. The ventral IPS clusters showed similar rotation-modulated responses during both MI and VI (Figure 3D–F). Anatomically, these clusters fall close to the human equivalents of the VIP (Bremmer et al., 2001) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP; Berman et al., 1999). Functionally, the response profiles of the ventral IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s VIP and LIP, namely, VIP’s sensitivity to circular optic f lows (Schaafsma & Duysens, 1996) and LIP’s involvement in saccadic eye movements (Barash, Bracewell, Fogassi, Gnadt, & Andersen, 1991). Similar rotation-modulated effects were also found in the occipito-temporal cortex (hMT+/V5; Figure 3A–C) and frontal regions (hFEF; Figure 3G–I). In the macaque, these cortical areas are connected to the VIP–LIP (Boussaoud, Ungerleider, & Desimone, 1990). Conversely, the dorsal IPS clusters showed rotationmodulated responses during MI but not during VI (Figure 3M–N). Anatomically, the position of these clusters along the human IPS is consistent with the location of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) along the IPS in the macaque (Colby, Gattass, Olson, & Gross, 1988). Functionally, the res...

Citation Context

...matosensory information. It has been shown how the superior parietal lobule combines these sensory inputs for coding static arm position (Graziano, Cooke, & Taylor, 2000). Here, de Lange, Hagoort, and Toni 105 we extend the scope of those findings to ‘‘dynamic’’ motor cognitive processes, localizing the effect to the dorsal portion of the middle third of the human IPS. Frontal Cortex There has been mixed evidence concerning the involvement of the premotor and motor cortex in imagery tasks (Gerardin et al., 2000; Richter, Somorjai, et al., 2000; Carpenter, Just, Keller, Eddy, & Thulborn, 1999; Bonda, Petrides, Frey, & Evans, 1995). By disambiguating imagery-related signals from activity associated with residual variability in response times, here we could functionally differentiate between prefrontal, central, and precentral activities. Neural activity at the junction between the superior frontal sulcus and the superior precentral gyrus (putative hFEF; Berman et al., 1999; Paus, 1996) were equally modulated by rotation in both MI and VI (Figure 3G–I). The response profile and the location of these frontal clusters are compatible with control of eye movements, rather than planning of hand movements. Conversely, the rot...

Citation Context

...stent with the location of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) along the IPS in the macaque (Colby, Gattass, Olson, & Gross, 1988). Functionally, the response profiles of the dorsal IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s MIP, namely, arm- and hand-centered visuoproprioceptive receptive fields (Colby, 1998). Finally, MIdependent rotation-modulated effects were found not only along the dorsal IPS, but also in the dorsolateral premotor cortex (Figure 3J–L) and in occipito-parietal regions (Table 2). In the macaque, these cortical areas are directly connected to the MIP (Matelli, Govoni, Galletti, Kutz, & Luppino, 1998). These results localize and detail cognitive motor processes, over and above generic imagery-related phenomena. Examples of the latter are eye movements, known to constitute an essential component of imagery tasks (Laeng & Teodorescu, 2002). The functional and anatomical characteristics of the ventral IPS signal (Figure 3D–F) are compatible with a role in controlling rotation-related eye movements common to both imagery tasks. Conversely, the dorsal IPS activity (Figure 3M– N) cannot be related to eye movements, being indifferent to stimuli rotation in VI but not in MI. It might be argued th...

Citation Context

....05 corrected), there were responses along the cerebellar vermis (4, 62, 32). There was no stronger rotationrelated activity during VI than MI (VIs > MIs). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found along the occipito-temporal fissure (Figure 3A–C) is near (< 9 mm) hMT+/V5, the human visual motion complex (Amedi, Jacobson, Hendler, Malach, & Zohary, 2002), and close (< 7 mm) to a cortical field that selectively responds to circular flow motion (Morrone et al., 2000). Our occipito-temporal cluster is distant (> 12 mm) from regions involved in ocular pursuit (Dukelow et al., 2001; Petit & Haxby, 1999). Our occipito-temporal cluster is also distant (> 28 mm) from superior temporal regions involved in performance of ‘‘delayed’’ responses, either in the context of arbitrary visuomotor associations (Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001) or in the context of imitative behavior (Decety, Chaminade, Greze, & Meltzoff, 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Furthermore, the present dataset showed no significant ( p < .05) rotationrelated signals on volumes of interest (VOIs) centered on the local maxima reported in those studies (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et...

Citation Context

...ects were presented with drawings of hands and asked to report whether they were seeing a left hand or a right hand, regardless of the angle of rotation of each stimulus from its upright position. We paired this MI task with a visual imagery (VI) control task in which subjects were presented with typographical characters and asked to report whether they were seeing a canonical letter or its mirror image, regardless of its rotation (Alivisatos & Petrides, 1997; Shepard & Cooper, 1982). During task performance, we measured behavioral performance and neural activity with fast event-related fMRI (Friston, Zarahn, Josephs, Henson, & Dale, 1999). This experimental design allowed us to distinguish responses parametrically related to MI from responses evoked by VI and other task-related phenomena. Crucially, during each trial, we distinguished between neural activity associated with different components, namely, stimulusrelated activity, mental rotation-related activity, and residual response-related activity. We performed two separate control experiments. We investigated the influence of the posture of the subject’s own arm on the performance of MI and VI tasks. Furthermore, we assessed muscular activity in the left and right hands d...

Citation Context

...l regions showed stimulus-related activity that was unaffected by rotation and response (Table 1). Both tasks evoked similar activity (MIs \ VIs) in the extrastriate visual cortex (see Figure 2A–C), left postcentral sulcus, left frontal operculum, anterior cingulate sulcus (bilaterally), posterior hippocampi, and portions of the cerebellum. Stronger stimulus-related activity during MI than VI (MIs > VIs) was found in the right occipital lobe (calcarine sulcus and middle occipital gyrus; Figure 2D–F). Calcarine activity was within the variability range of cytoarchitectonically defined area 17 (Amunts, Malikovic, Mohlberg, Schormann, & Zilles, 2000). There was no stronger stimulus-related activity during VI than MI (VIs > MIs). Stimulus-related Activity (MIs, VIs): Hemodynamic Response Figure 2A and D illustrates the BOLD peak signal change with respect to baseline across experimental factors for representative cerebral regions. Figure 2C and F shows the corresponding parameter estimates for different variance components. The right lingual gyrus (Figure 2A– C) was active during performance of both MI and VI (Figure 2C; ‘‘Stimulus’’ histograms). In contrast, the middle occipital gyrus (Figure 2D–F) showed consistent responses during perf...

Citation Context

...and hand-centered visuoproprioceptive receptive fields (Colby, 1998). Finally, MIdependent rotation-modulated effects were found not only along the dorsal IPS, but also in the dorsolateral premotor cortex (Figure 3J–L) and in occipito-parietal regions (Table 2). In the macaque, these cortical areas are directly connected to the MIP (Matelli, Govoni, Galletti, Kutz, & Luppino, 1998). These results localize and detail cognitive motor processes, over and above generic imagery-related phenomena. Examples of the latter are eye movements, known to constitute an essential component of imagery tasks (Laeng & Teodorescu, 2002). The functional and anatomical characteristics of the ventral IPS signal (Figure 3D–F) are compatible with a role in controlling rotation-related eye movements common to both imagery tasks. Conversely, the dorsal IPS activity (Figure 3M– N) cannot be related to eye movements, being indifferent to stimuli rotation in VI but not in MI. It might be argued that the absence of rotation-related modulation of neural responses during VI in the dorsal IPS is a floor effect due to different task difficulties between MI and VI. However, nearby regions, such as the ventral IPS clusters, show a strong rot...

Citation Context

...ement representations in the human brain. During intended action, the posterior parietal cortex combines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Anders...

Citation Context

... Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate o...

Citation Context

...ese cortical areas are connected to the VIP–LIP (Boussaoud, Ungerleider, & Desimone, 1990). Conversely, the dorsal IPS clusters showed rotationmodulated responses during MI but not during VI (Figure 3M–N). Anatomically, the position of these clusters along the human IPS is consistent with the location of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) along the IPS in the macaque (Colby, Gattass, Olson, & Gross, 1988). Functionally, the response profiles of the dorsal IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s MIP, namely, arm- and hand-centered visuoproprioceptive receptive fields (Colby, 1998). Finally, MIdependent rotation-modulated effects were found not only along the dorsal IPS, but also in the dorsolateral premotor cortex (Figure 3J–L) and in occipito-parietal regions (Table 2). In the macaque, these cortical areas are directly connected to the MIP (Matelli, Govoni, Galletti, Kutz, & Luppino, 1998). These results localize and detail cognitive motor processes, over and above generic imagery-related phenomena. Examples of the latter are eye movements, known to constitute an essential component of imagery tasks (Laeng & Teodorescu, 2002). The functional and anatomical characteris...

Citation Context

...ight not generalize to movement representations related to immediate action. In this study, we aim to characterize not only which regions are implicated in immediate action independently from movement execution, but also how they are implicated. In order to isolate movement represen-University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands D 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17:1, pp. 97–112 tations from movement execution without forcing delays in the sensorimotor process, we have appealed to the concept of implicit motor imagery (MI). Several psychophysical studies (Parsons, 1987, 1994; Sekiyama, 1982) have demonstrated that human subjects, when asked to judge the laterality of a rotated image of a hand, solve this task by imagining their own hand moving from its current position into the stimulus orientation for comparison. Here we have used MI as a ‘‘tool’’ to drive subjects to manipulate movement representations, defined as internal models of the goal of an action (Jeannerod, 1994). In this perspective, our manipulation is likely to evoke internal simulation of actions for the purpose of selecting the most biomechanically appealing movement plan, thus allowing for ...

Citation Context

...a, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pis...

Citation Context

...nning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an act...

Citation Context

...vements (Barash, Bracewell, Fogassi, Gnadt, & Andersen, 1991). Similar rotation-modulated effects were also found in the occipito-temporal cortex (hMT+/V5; Figure 3A–C) and frontal regions (hFEF; Figure 3G–I). In the macaque, these cortical areas are connected to the VIP–LIP (Boussaoud, Ungerleider, & Desimone, 1990). Conversely, the dorsal IPS clusters showed rotationmodulated responses during MI but not during VI (Figure 3M–N). Anatomically, the position of these clusters along the human IPS is consistent with the location of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) along the IPS in the macaque (Colby, Gattass, Olson, & Gross, 1988). Functionally, the response profiles of the dorsal IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s MIP, namely, arm- and hand-centered visuoproprioceptive receptive fields (Colby, 1998). Finally, MIdependent rotation-modulated effects were found not only along the dorsal IPS, but also in the dorsolateral premotor cortex (Figure 3J–L) and in occipito-parietal regions (Table 2). In the macaque, these cortical areas are directly connected to the MIP (Matelli, Govoni, Galletti, Kutz, & Luppino, 1998). These results localize and detail cognitive motor processes, over and above ge...

Citation Context

...tal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus presentation (Goodale, Jakobson, & Keillor, 1994), a patient with optic ataxia ‘‘improved’’ her grasping performance when a delay was introduced between stimulus and response (Milner, Dijkerman, Pisella, et al., 2001). In this perspective, it is conceivable that the findings of previous studies, exploiting delayrelated responses to operationalize movement preparation, might not generalize to movement repres...

Citation Context

...o movement representations related to immediate action. In this study, we aim to characterize not only which regions are implicated in immediate action independently from movement execution, but also how they are implicated. In order to isolate movement represen-University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands D 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17:1, pp. 97–112 tations from movement execution without forcing delays in the sensorimotor process, we have appealed to the concept of implicit motor imagery (MI). Several psychophysical studies (Parsons, 1987, 1994; Sekiyama, 1982) have demonstrated that human subjects, when asked to judge the laterality of a rotated image of a hand, solve this task by imagining their own hand moving from its current position into the stimulus orientation for comparison. Here we have used MI as a ‘‘tool’’ to drive subjects to manipulate movement representations, defined as internal models of the goal of an action (Jeannerod, 1994). In this perspective, our manipulation is likely to evoke internal simulation of actions for the purpose of selecting the most biomechanically appealing movement plan, thus allowing for the computation and ref...

Citation Context

...udy provides novel evidence on the topography and content of movement representations in the human brain. During intended action, the posterior parietal cortex combines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, S...

Citation Context

...2; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Accordingly, our findings provide further support for the hypothesis that delayed actions and immediate responses rely on different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Conclusions We have characterized topography and content of neural correlates of action planning, and dissociated them from neural responses to external events by virtue of an implicit MI task. We have confirmed that posterior parietal and precentral regions are involved in specifying intended actions (Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001; Snyder, Batista, & Andersen, 1997; Kalaska & Crammond, 1995). We have provided novel evidence supporting the notion that while the superior parietal lobule combines somatosensory and visual information, the dorsal precentral gyrus generates motor plans, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. METHODS Six healthy, young (25 ± 2 years) men participated in the study after giving written informed consent according to institutional guidelines of the local ethics committee (CMO region Arnhem–Nijmegen, Netherlands). All participants were right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, Oldfield, 1971; 90 ± 10%, mean ± SD). Tasks We used two t...

Citation Context

...erpret rotation-related ‘‘neural’’ activity that differed across tasks as reflecting motor cognitive processes, rather than task-related differences in strategic control, selective attention, or working memory. Task Complexity In light of the RT differences between MI and VI, one could ask whether the activation differences found are due to the recruitment of movement-specific representations or just the greater work required by the MI task. Although absence of behavioral differences as well as behavioral corroboration seems to posit potential pitfalls for inference of neural activation data (Wilkinson & Halligan, 2004), we sought to tackle this potential confound by inspecting subject-by-subject variability in behavioral and neural effects across tasks. We argued that, provided there is a sizable overlap in the behavioral rotation-related effects evoked in individual subjects during MI and VI, the regions that we claimed to be specifically involved in movement representations should show a correlation between behavioral and neural effects across subjects during MI, whereas the correlation between behavior and neural responsivity should be absent during VI. Figure 4 shows the application of this rationale in...

Citation Context

... these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have bee...

Citation Context

... the laterality of a rotated image of a hand, solve this task by imagining their own hand moving from its current position into the stimulus orientation for comparison. Here we have used MI as a ‘‘tool’’ to drive subjects to manipulate movement representations, defined as internal models of the goal of an action (Jeannerod, 1994). In this perspective, our manipulation is likely to evoke internal simulation of actions for the purpose of selecting the most biomechanically appealing movement plan, thus allowing for the computation and refinement of the premotor plan (Johnson, Rote, et al., 2002; Johnson, 2000). It is important to note, however, that behavioral and neural correlates of internal simulation of actions may not generalize to movement planning of immediate actions, given that actions were simulated and not carried out. Subjects were presented with drawings of hands and asked to report whether they were seeing a left hand or a right hand, regardless of the angle of rotation of each stimulus from its upright position. We paired this MI task with a visual imagery (VI) control task in which subjects were presented with typographical characters and asked to report whether they were seeing a c...

Citation Context

...arietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and del...

Citation Context

...Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical stud...

Citation Context

...th movement execution, rather than motor planning. However, it remains to be seen whether this finding is limited to the current experimental setup, or whether it represents a general modus operandi of the human primary motor cortex. Neural activity in the right inferior precentral sulcus increased as a function of rotation during MI, but not during VI. This response profile is compatible with the functional and anatomical characteristics of the macaque’s premotor neurons clustered in front of the spur of the arcuate sulcus, namely, arm-centered, motionsensitive visuotactile receptive fields (Graziano & Gandhi, 2000; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997; Fogassi et al., 1996). Similar properties have emerged from the human inferior precentral cortex (Bremmer et al., 2001) in a location close (< 10 mm) to the present cluster. Our findings suggest that this region might not be concerned with processing sensory stimuli per se, but rather with evaluating their relevance for preparing an adequate motor response. Neural activity along the right middle frontal sulcus (putative human 46/9; Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995) revealed MI-dependent increases in neural activity with increasing rotation. It has been argued that...

Citation Context

...0 54 R 4.61 24 60 54 Superior precentral gyrus L 5.02 22 12 48 R 4.57 28 8 48 Anterior cingulate sulcus L 5.21 0 14 50 Frontal operculum L 5.43 28 22 0 MIp > VIp Occipito-parietal fissure R 4.93 26 66 40 Dorsal intraparietal sulcus L 5.68 26 60 58 R 5.09 26 56 56 Inferior precentral sulcus R 4.75 46 4 26 Superior precentral sulcus L 4.36 24 2 66 Anterior cingulate sulcus R 4.40 6 20 44 Middle frontal sulcus R 4.76 34 44 38 de Lange, Hagoort, and Toni 103 central sulcus corresponds to the morphologically and metabolically defined location of the hand area in the primary motor cortex (Maldjian, Gottschalk, Patel, Detre, & Alsop, 1999). Response-related Activity (MIr, VIr): Evoked Hemodynamic Responses The BOLD signal of pre- and postcentral clusters is not modulated by rotation, or differentially affected by task. Rather, it displays equal activity across rotation levels during both MI and VI. These regions show no first- or second-order rotation-related effects in either of the two tasks, and overlapping effects of task. DISCUSSION In this study, we have used implicit MI as at tool to investigate neural activity related to planning hand movements, yet independent from sensory or motoric events. In the following sections,...

Citation Context

...ssingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus presentation (Goodale, Jakobson, & Keillor, 1994), a patient with optic ataxia ‘‘improved’’ her grasping performance when a delay was introduced between sti...

Citation Context

...models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notio...

Citation Context

...during both MI and VI. These regions show no first- or second-order rotation-related effects in either of the two tasks, and overlapping effects of task. DISCUSSION In this study, we have used implicit MI as at tool to investigate neural activity related to planning hand movements, yet independent from sensory or motoric events. In the following sections, we discuss our behavioral and neural findings, focusing on fronto-parietal responses and their interactions with occipito-temporal activity. We conclude by elaborating on the relevance of these findings for current models of action planning (Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 2002; Hommel, Musseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Behavioral Performance We have used a mental rotation paradigm to induce MI and VI (Kosslyn, 1996). The tasks were performed with low ERs, indicating that the subjects were effectively engaged in the imagery tests. The RT profiles changed as a function of rotation (Figure 1B), indicating that the subjects used mental rotation to judge the laterality of hands (MI task) and letters (VI task). The rotationrelated modulation of performance differed across tasks, indicating that mental rotation in MI engaged additional reso...

Citation Context

...n processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus presentation (Goodale, Jakobson, & Keillor, 1994), a patient with optic ataxia ‘‘improved’’ her grasping performance when a delay was introduced between stimulus and response (Milner, Dijkerman, Pisella, et al., 2001). In this perspective, it is conceivable that the findings of previous studies, exploiting delayrelated responses to operationalize movement ...

Citation Context

...d in mental rotation (Tables 2 and 3). By manipulating type and load of imagery, we could highlight a dorsoventral gradient of activity along the IPS. The ventral IPS clusters showed similar rotation-modulated responses during both MI and VI (Figure 3D–F). Anatomically, these clusters fall close to the human equivalents of the VIP (Bremmer et al., 2001) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP; Berman et al., 1999). Functionally, the response profiles of the ventral IPS clusters are compatible with the properties of the macaque’s VIP and LIP, namely, VIP’s sensitivity to circular optic f lows (Schaafsma & Duysens, 1996) and LIP’s involvement in saccadic eye movements (Barash, Bracewell, Fogassi, Gnadt, & Andersen, 1991). Similar rotation-modulated effects were also found in the occipito-temporal cortex (hMT+/V5; Figure 3A–C) and frontal regions (hFEF; Figure 3G–I). In the macaque, these cortical areas are connected to the VIP–LIP (Boussaoud, Ungerleider, & Desimone, 1990). Conversely, the dorsal IPS clusters showed rotationmodulated responses during MI but not during VI (Figure 3M–N). Anatomically, the position of these clusters along the human IPS is consistent with the location of the medial intraparietal ...

Citation Context

...motor response. Neural activity along the right middle frontal sulcus (putative human 46/9; Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995) revealed MI-dependent increases in neural activity with increasing rotation. It has been argued that MI requires inhibition of overt movement (Jeannerod, 1995), and the right prefrontal cortex has been implicated in inhibitory control (Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999). However, those responses are distant (> 19 mm) from our site. Rather, the activity found in this area (46/9) is compatible with the role of this region in selecting between competing responses (Hadland et al., 2001; Rowe et al., 2000), that is, selection of the appropriate hand and corresponding covert movement during the MI task. Occipito-Temporal Cortex Previous studies have shown that extrastriate activity correlates with subjects’ perceptual experience, independently from the characteristics of the sensory inputs (Nichols & Newsome, 2002; Tootell et al., 1995). By manipulating the amount of mental rotation while keeping the actual stimuli stationary, here we could isolate extrastriate signals independently from physical or perceived rotations of the visual stimuli. Neural activity around the occipit...

Citation Context

...eg the question of whether and how such extrastriate activity contributes to the manipulation of action representations. Functional interactions between movement- and perceptual-related structures have been postulated by computational and cognitive models of motor control as a way to predict the sensory consequences of a planned movement (Hommel et al., 2001; Wolpert & Ghahrama106 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 17, Number 1 ni, 2000). Here we localize these perceptuo-motor interactions to frontal and occipito-temporal regions, which are both part of the ‘‘dorsal’’ visuomotor stream (Milner & Goodale, 1995). In this context, it can be noticed that the extrastriate activity reported in this experiment (Figure 3B) is spatially distinct from the posterior temporal responses reported in studies dealing with delayed responses, either in the context of arbitrary visuomotor associations (Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001) or in the context of imitative behavior (Decety et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001). Accordingly, our findings provide further support for the hypothesis that delayed actions and immediate responses rely on different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002; M...

Citation Context

...ocal maxima reported in those studies (Decety et al., 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Iacoboni et al., 2001; Toni, Thoenissen, et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity (MIp \ VIp) found bilaterally along the ‘‘ventral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (36, 40, 38; 42, 36, 44) is within variability range of the human ventral intraparietal area (VIP; Bremmer et al., 2001). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the ‘‘lateral’’ portion of the intraparietal sulci (24, 60, 54; 30, 50, 54) falls within the variability range of the human parietal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The common rotation-related activity found bilaterally along the superior precentral gyri (28, 8, 48; 22, 12, 48; see Figure 3) falls within the variability range of the human frontal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) found in the parietal (Figure 3M–N) and precentral cortex (Figure 3J–L) fall ‘‘outside’’ the variability range of the parietal and frontal eye fields (Berman et al., 1999). The differential rotation-related activity (MIp > VIp) observed in the right inferior precentral sulcus is near (< 10 mm) a human precentral field in...

Citation Context

...licated in inhibitory control (Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999). However, those responses are distant (> 19 mm) from our site. Rather, the activity found in this area (46/9) is compatible with the role of this region in selecting between competing responses (Hadland et al., 2001; Rowe et al., 2000), that is, selection of the appropriate hand and corresponding covert movement during the MI task. Occipito-Temporal Cortex Previous studies have shown that extrastriate activity correlates with subjects’ perceptual experience, independently from the characteristics of the sensory inputs (Nichols & Newsome, 2002; Tootell et al., 1995). By manipulating the amount of mental rotation while keeping the actual stimuli stationary, here we could isolate extrastriate signals independently from physical or perceived rotations of the visual stimuli. Neural activity around the occipito-temporal fissure (putative hMT+/V5; Amedi et al., 2002) showed overlapping rotation-modulated signals during both imagery tasks (Figure 3A–C). Incidentally, this result provides support to ‘‘depictive’’ accounts of VI (Kosslyn, 1996) by showing that mental rotation of ‘‘stationary’’ visual stimuli modulates neural activity in the...

Citation Context

...ld theory allowed us to make inferences corrected for the number of nonindependent comparisons (Friston, Holmes, Worsley, Poline, et al., 1995). The effective degrees of freedom of the error term took into account the temporal autocorrelation of the data (Friston, Holmes, Poline, et al., 1995). We report the results of a fixed-effect group analysis. The inferences we provide are about the presence of an effect in these subjects during these scanning sessions and not about the average size of the effect in the population from which the subjects were drawn (Friston, Holmes, Price, et al., 1999; Friston, Holmes, & Worsley, 1999). Consistency of the effects across subjects was ensured via multisubject conjunction analyses (Friston, Holmes, Price, et al., 1999). The statistical analysis of the fMRI data adopted a mass univariate approach, and the inferences pertain to the voxel level, with an arbitrarily chosen ER of 1% ( p threshold = .01; Z threshold = 3.84). This approach introduces a multiple comparisons problem. Here we have corrected for performing multiple tests over the whole brain by using the False Discovery Rate approach (Genovese, Lazar, & Nichols, 2002). In addition to the procedure described above, in on...

Citation Context

...muli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, 2001; Jeannerod, 1997). However, immediate and delayed performances of motor behavior might be controlled by different neural circuits (Rossetti & Pisella, 2002). For instance, psychophysical studies have shown that providing immediate or delayed responses to sensory stimuli depends on different sensorimotor processes (Bridgeman, Gemmer, Forsman, & Huemer, 2000; Gentilucci, Chieffi, Deprati, Saetti, & Toni, 1996; Wong & Mack, 1981). Neuropsychological studies have shown that, although a patient with visual agnosia could correctly grasp objects only when the movement occurred shortly after stimulus presentation (Goodale, Jakobson, & Keillor, 1994), a patient with optic ataxia ‘‘improved’’ her grasping performance when a delay was introduced between stimulus and response (Milner, Dijkerman, Pisella, et al., 2001). In this perspective, it is conceivable that the findings of previous studies, exploiting delayrelated responses to operationalize movement preparation, might not generalize to movement representations related to...

Citation Context

...ng monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have not explicitly addressed the nature of the information processes implemented by frontal and parietal regions during the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses. Furthermore, these investigations have been based on the notion that preparing to execute an action evokes its mental representation (Rizzolatti & Luppino, ...

Citation Context

...ombines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingham, 1999; Richter, Andersen, Georgopoulos, & Kim, 1997; Deiber, Ibanez, Sadato, & Hallett, 1996). However, these studies have...

Citation Context

...e on the topography and content of movement representations in the human brain. During intended action, the posterior parietal cortex combines somatosensory and visuomotor information, whereas the dorsal premotor cortex generates the actual motor plan, and the primary motor cortex deals with movement execution. We discuss the relevance of these results in the context of current models of action planning. & INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological studies in behaving monkeys have revealed the how parietal and premotor cortex contributes to plan movements of the hand and arm (Crammond & Kalaska, 2000; Johnson, Coltz, Hagen, & Ebner, 1999; Shen & Alexander, 1997; Johnson, Ferraina, Bianchi, & Caminiti, 1996; Ashe & Georgopoulos, 1994; Crammond & Kalaska, 1989). Imaging studies in humans have also investigated neural correlates of movement planning, isolating neurovascular responses during movement preparation in delayed response tasks (Connolly, Goodale, Menon, & Munoz, 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Thoenissen, Zilles, & Toni, 2002; Toni, Shah, et al., 2002; Toni, Thoenissen, & Zilles, 2001; Connolly, Goodale, Desouza, Menon, & Vilis, 2000; D’Esposito, Ballard, Zarahn, & Aguirre, 2000; Toni, Schluter, Josephs, Friston, & Passingha...

Citation Context

...ed effects in either of the two tasks, and overlapping effects of task. DISCUSSION In this study, we have used implicit MI as at tool to investigate neural activity related to planning hand movements, yet independent from sensory or motoric events. In the following sections, we discuss our behavioral and neural findings, focusing on fronto-parietal responses and their interactions with occipito-temporal activity. We conclude by elaborating on the relevance of these findings for current models of action planning (Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 2002; Hommel, Musseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001; Milner & Dijkerman, 2001). Behavioral Performance We have used a mental rotation paradigm to induce MI and VI (Kosslyn, 1996). The tasks were performed with low ERs, indicating that the subjects were effectively engaged in the imagery tests. The RT profiles changed as a function of rotation (Figure 1B), indicating that the subjects used mental rotation to judge the laterality of hands (MI task) and letters (VI task). The rotationrelated modulation of performance differed across tasks, indicating that mental rotation in MI engaged additional resources as compared to VI. Subjects’ posture influenced the RT profile durin...