Semantic Web Service Architecture
Abstract:
The importance of Web services has been recognized and widely accepted by industry and academic research. However, the two worlds have proposed solutions that progress along different dimensions. Academic research has been mostly concerned with expressiveness of service descriptions, while industry has focused on modularization of service layers — mostly for usability in the short term. This paper is concerned with merging the two streams of progress. Our point of departure is the current proposal by IBM. Its proposal is extended by Semantic Web technologies such that a smooth evolution from Web services in the current Web to Web services in the Semantic Web appears possible and — in fact — highly desirable. As a showcase we describe SWOBIS, an ontology-compatible registry for software tools, that is open to usage in the Semantic Web.
Citations
| 60 | Web Services Flow Language (WSFL 1.0 – Leymann |
| 50 | B.: UPML: A Framework for Knowledge System Reuse, IJCAI – Fensel, Benjamins, et al. - 1999 |
| 39 | An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component Reuse on the World-Wide Web – Benjamins, Plaza, et al. - 1998 |
| 16 | Standardizing agent communication – Labrou - 2001 |
| 14 | Daml-s: A semantic markup language for web services – Ankolenkar, Burstein, et al. - 2001 |
| 7 | Ittalks: A case study in the semantic web and daml – Cost, Finin, et al. - 2002 |
| 2 | DAML+OIL language release – Horrocks, Harmelen, et al. - 2001 |
| 2 | Web Services: The Next Big Thing. XMLJournal 2. http://www.sys-con.com/xml – Martin |
| 2 | Ontology-based Services for the Semantic Web – Sollazzo |
