This paper describes a compositional shape analysis, where each procedure is analyzed independently of its callers. The analysis uses an abstract domain based on a restricted fragment of separation logic, and assigns a collection of Hoare triples to each procedure; the triples provide an over-approximation of data structure usage. Compositionality brings its usual benefits – increased potential to scale, ability to deal with unknown calling contexts, graceful way to deal with imprecision – to shape analysis, for the first time. The analysis rests on a generalized form of abduction (inference of explanatory hypotheses) which we call bi-abduction. Biabduction displays abduction as a kind of inverse to the frame problem: it jointly infers anti-frames (missing portions of state) and frames (portions of state not touched by an operation), and is the basis of a new interprocedural analysis algorithm. We have implemented

chinwn,davidcri,nguyenh2© Conventional specifications for object-oriented (OO) programs must adhere to behavioral subtyping in support of class inheritance and method overriding. However, this requirement inherently weakens the specifications of overridden methods in superclasses, leading to imprecision during program reasoning. To address this, we advocate a fresh approach to OO verification that focuses on the distinction and relation between specifications that cater to calls with static dispatching from those for calls with dynamic dispatching. We formulate a novel specification subsumption that can avoid code re-verification, where possible. Using a predicate mechanism, we propose a flexible scheme for supporting class invariant and lossless casting. Our aim is to lay the foundation for a practical verification system that is precise, concise and modular for sequential OO programs. We exploit the separation logic formalism to achieve this.

An important, challenging problem in the verification of imperative programs with shared, mutable state is the frame problem in the presence of data abstraction. That is, one must be able to specify and verify upper bounds on the set of memory locations a method can read and write without exposing that method’s implementation. Separation logic is now widely considered the most promising solution to this problem. However, unlike conventional verification approaches, separation logic assertions cannot mention heap-dependent expressions from the host programming language such as method calls familiar to many developers. Moreover, separation logic-based verifiers are often based on symbolic execution. These symbolic execution-based verifiers typically do not support non-separating conjunction, and some of them rely on the developer to explicitly fold and unfold predicate definitions. Furthermore, several researchers have wondered whether it is possible to use verification condition generation and standard first-order provers instead of symbolic execution to automatically verify conformance with a separation logic specification. In this paper, we propose a variant of separation logic, called implicit dynamic frames, that supports heap-dependent expressions inside assertions. Conformance with an implicit dynamic frames specification can be checked by proving validity of a number of first-order verification conditions. To show that these verification

Separation logic is an extension of Hoare logic to verify imperative programs with pointers and mutable datastructures. Although there exist several implementations of verifiers for separation logic, none of them has actually been itself verified. In this paper, we present a verifier for a fragment of separation logic that is verified inside the Coq proof assistant. This verifier is implemented as a Coq tactic by reflection to verify separation logic triples. Thanks to the extraction facility to OCaml, we can also derive a certified, stand-alone and efficient verifier for separation logic. 1

Abstract not found

We discuss usage protocols for iterator objects that prevent concurrent modifications of the underlying collection while iterators are in progress. We formalize these protocols in Java-like object interfaces, enriched with separation logic contracts. We present examples of iterator clients and proofs that they adhere to the iterator protocol, as well as examples of iterator implementations and proofs that they implement the iterator interface.

Abstract. We describe Deskcheck, a parametric static analyzer that is able to establish properties of programs that manipulate dynamically allocated memory, arrays, and integers. Deskcheck can verify quantified invariants over mixed abstract domains, e.g., heap and numeric domains. These domains need only minor extensions to work with our domain combination framework. The technique used for managing the communication between domains is reminiscent of the Nelson-Oppen technique for combining decision procedures, in that the two domains share a common predicate language to exchange shared facts. However, whereas the Nelson-Oppen technique is limited to a common predicate language of shared equalities, the technique described in this paper uses a common predicate language in which shared facts can be quantified predicates expressed in first-order logic with transitive closure. We explain how we used Deskcheck to establish memory safety of the

We present a logic for relating heap-manipulating programs to numeric abstractions. These numeric abstractions are expressed as simple imperative programs over integer variables and have the property that termination and safety of the numeric program ensures termination and safety of the original, heap-manipulating program. We have implemented an automated version of this abstraction process and present experimental results for programs involving a variety of data structures.

Abstract. Recursively defined properties are ubiquitous. We present a proof method for establishing entailment G | = H of such properties G and H over a set of common variables. The main contribution is a particular proof rule based intuitively upon the concept of coinduction. This rule allows the inductive step of assuming that an entailment holds during the proof the entailment. In general, the proof method is based on an unfolding (and no folding) algorithm that reduces recursive definitions to a point where only constraint solving is necessary. The constraint-based proof obligation is then discharged with available solvers. The algorithm executes the proof by a search-based method which automatically discovers the opportunity of applying induction instead of the user having to specify some induction schema, and which does not require any base case. 1

We present Low-Level Liquid Types, a refinement type system for C based on Liquid Types. Low-Level Liquid Types combine refinement types with three key elements to automate verification of critical safety properties of low-level programs: First, by associating refinement types with individual heap locations and precisely tracking the locations referenced by pointers, our system is able to reason about complex invariants of in-memory data structures and sophisticated uses of pointer arithmetic. Second, by adding constructs which allow strong updates to the types of heap locations, even in the presence of aliasing, our system is able to verify properties of in-memory data structures in spite of temporary invariant violations. By using this strong update mechanism, our system is able to verify the correct initialization of newly-allocated regions of memory. Third, by using the abstract interpretation framework of Liquid Types, we are able to use refinement type inference to automatically verify important safety properties without imposing an onerous annotation burden. We have implemented our approach in CSOLVE, a tool for Low-Level Liquid Type inference for C programs. We demonstrate through several examples that CSOLVE is able to precisely infer complex invariants required to verify important safety properties, like the absence of array bounds violations and null-dereferences, with a minimal annotation overhead.