Results 1  10
of
164
Lazy Satisfiability Modulo Theories
 JOURNAL ON SATISFIABILITY, BOOLEAN MODELING AND COMPUTATION 3 (2007) 141Â224
, 2007
"... Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) is the problem of deciding the satisfiability of a firstorder formula with respect to some decidable firstorder theory T (SMT (T)). These problems are typically not handled adequately by standard automated theorem provers. SMT is being recognized as increasingl ..."
Abstract

Cited by 189 (50 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) is the problem of deciding the satisfiability of a firstorder formula with respect to some decidable firstorder theory T (SMT (T)). These problems are typically not handled adequately by standard automated theorem provers. SMT is being recognized as increasingly important due to its applications in many domains in different communities, in particular in formal verification. An amount of papers with novel and very efficient techniques for SMT has been published in the last years, and some very efficient SMT tools are now available. Typical SMT (T) problems require testing the satisfiability of formulas which are Boolean combinations of atomic propositions and atomic expressions in T, so that heavy Boolean reasoning must be efficiently combined with expressive theoryspecific reasoning. The dominating approach to SMT (T), called lazy approach, is based on the integration of a SAT solver and of a decision procedure able to handle sets of atomic constraints in T (Tsolver), handling respectively the Boolean and the theoryspecific components of reasoning. Unfortunately, neither the problem of building an efficient SMT solver, nor even that
Resolve and Expand
 IN PROC. OF SAT’04
, 2004
"... We present a novel expansion based decision procedure for quantified boolean formulas (QBF) in conjunctive normal form (CNF). The basic idea is to resolve existentially quantified variables and eliminate universal variables by expansion. This process is continued until the formula becomes propositi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 134 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present a novel expansion based decision procedure for quantified boolean formulas (QBF) in conjunctive normal form (CNF). The basic idea is to resolve existentially quantified variables and eliminate universal variables by expansion. This process is continued until the formula becomes propositional and can be solved by any SAT solver. On structured problems our implementation quantor is competitive with stateoftheart QBF solvers based on DPLL. It is orders of magnitude faster on certain hard to solve instances.
Fault diagnosis and logic debugging using Boolean satisfiability
 IEEE TRANS. ON CAD
, 2005
"... Recent advances in Boolean satisfiability have made it an attractive engine for solving many digital verylargescaleintegration design problems. Although useful in many stages of the design cycle, fault diagnosis and logic debugging have not been addressed within a satisfiabilitybased framework. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (32 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Recent advances in Boolean satisfiability have made it an attractive engine for solving many digital verylargescaleintegration design problems. Although useful in many stages of the design cycle, fault diagnosis and logic debugging have not been addressed within a satisfiabilitybased framework. This work proposes a novel Boolean satisfiabilitybased method for multiplefault diagnosis and multipledesignerror diagnosis in combinational and sequential circuits. A number of heuristics are presented that keep the method memory and runtime efficient. An extensive suite of experiments on large circuits corrupted with different types of faults and errors confirm its robustness and practicality. They also suggest that satisfiability captures significant characteristics of the problem of diagnosis and encourage novel research in satisfiabilitybased diagnosis as a complementary process to design verification.
Symbolic compositional verification by learning assumptions
 In CAV
, 2005
"... Abstract. The verification problem for a system consisting of components can be decomposed into simpler subproblems for the components using assumeguarantee reasoning. However, such compositional reasoning requires user guidance to identify appropriate assumptions for components. In this paper, we ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. The verification problem for a system consisting of components can be decomposed into simpler subproblems for the components using assumeguarantee reasoning. However, such compositional reasoning requires user guidance to identify appropriate assumptions for components. In this paper, we propose an automated solution for discovering assumptions based on the L \Lambda algorithm for active learning of regular languages. We present a symbolic implementation of the learning algorithm, and incorporate it in the model checker NuSMV. Our experiments demonstrate significant savings in the computational requirements of symbolic model checking.
Bounded model checking and induction: From refutation to verification (extended abstract, category A
 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2003, volume 2725 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
"... Abstract. We explore the combination of bounded model checking and induction for proving safety properties of infinitestate systems. In particular, we define a general kinduction scheme and prove completeness thereof. A main characteristic of our methodology is that strengthened invariants are gen ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. We explore the combination of bounded model checking and induction for proving safety properties of infinitestate systems. In particular, we define a general kinduction scheme and prove completeness thereof. A main characteristic of our methodology is that strengthened invariants are generated from failed kinduction proofs. This strengthening step requires quantifierelimination, and we propose a lazy quantifierelimination procedure, which delays expensive computations of disjunctive normal forms when possible. The effectiveness of induction based on bounded model checking and invariant strengthening is demonstrated using infinitestate systems ranging from communication protocols to timed automata and (linear) hybrid automata. 1 Introduction Bounded model checking (BMC) [5, 4, 7] is often used for refutation, where one systematically searches for counterexamples whose length is bounded by some integer k. The bound k is increased until a bug is found, or some precomputed completeness threshold is reached. Unfortunately, the computation of completeness thresholds is usually prohibitively expensive and these thresholds may be too large to effectively explore the associated bounded search space. In addition, such completeness thresholds do not exist for many infinitestate systems.
A Symbolic Approach to Predicate Abstraction
 COMPUTERAIDED VERIFICATION (CAV 2003), LNCS 2725
, 2003
"... Predicate abstraction is a useful form of abstraction for the verification of transition systems with large or infinite state spaces. One of the main bottlenecks of this approach is the extremely large number of decision procedures calls that are required to construct the abstract state space. I ..."
Abstract

Cited by 62 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Predicate abstraction is a useful form of abstraction for the verification of transition systems with large or infinite state spaces. One of the main bottlenecks of this approach is the extremely large number of decision procedures calls that are required to construct the abstract state space. In this paper we propose the use of a symbolic decision procedure and its application for predicate abstraction. The advantage of the approach is that it reduces the number of calls to the decision procedure exponentially and also provides for reducing the recomputations inherent in the current approaches. We provide two implementations of the symbolic decision procedure: one based on BDDs which leverages the current advances in early quantification algorithms, and the other based on SATsolvers. We also demonstrate our approach with quantified predicates for verifying parameterized systems. We illustrate the effectiveness of this approach on benchmarks from the verification of microprocessors, communication protocols, parameterized systems, and Microsoft Windows device drivers.
Applications of Craig interpolants in model checking
 In Proceedings of TACAS 2005 [TAC05
"... Abstract. A Craig interpolant for a mutually inconsistent pair of formulas (A, B) is a formula that is (1) implied by A, (2) inconsistent with B, and (3) expressed over the common variables of A and B. An interpolant can be efficiently derived from a refutation of A ∧ B, for certain theories and pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. A Craig interpolant for a mutually inconsistent pair of formulas (A, B) is a formula that is (1) implied by A, (2) inconsistent with B, and (3) expressed over the common variables of A and B. An interpolant can be efficiently derived from a refutation of A ∧ B, for certain theories and proof systems. We will discuss a number of applications of this concept in finiteand infinitestate model checking.
Model checking C programs using FSoft
 IN PCI 2.1, PCI SIG POSTING
, 2005
"... With the success of formal verification techniques like equivalence checking and model checking for hardware designs, there has been growing interest in applying such techniques for formal analysis and automatic verification of software programs. This paper provides a brief tutorial on model checkin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
With the success of formal verification techniques like equivalence checking and model checking for hardware designs, there has been growing interest in applying such techniques for formal analysis and automatic verification of software programs. This paper provides a brief tutorial on model checking of C programs. The essential approach is to model the semantics of C programs in the form of finite state systems by using suitable abstractions. The use of abstractions is key, both for modeling programs as finite state systems and for reducing the model sizes in order to manage verification complexity. We provide illustrative details of a verification platform called FSOFT, which provides a range of abstractions for modeling software, and uses customized SATbased and BDDbased model checking techniques targeted for software.
SATbased unbounded symbolic model checking
 in Proc. 40th Design Automat. Conf. Anaheim, CA: IEEE Computer Society
"... Abstract—This paper describes a Boolean satisfiability checking (SAT)based unbounded symbolic modelchecking algorithm. The conjunctive normal form is used to represent sets of states and transition relation. A logical operation on state sets is implemented as an operation on conjunctive normal fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract—This paper describes a Boolean satisfiability checking (SAT)based unbounded symbolic modelchecking algorithm. The conjunctive normal form is used to represent sets of states and transition relation. A logical operation on state sets is implemented as an operation on conjunctive normal form formulas. A satisfyall procedure is proposed to compute the existential quantification required in obtaining the preimage and fix point. The proposed satisfyall procedure is implemented by modifying a SAT procedure to generate all the satisfying assignments of the input formula, which is based on new efficient techniques such as line justification to make an assignment covering more search space, excluding clause management, and twolevel logic minimization to compress the set of found assignments. In addition, a cache table is introduced into the satisfyall procedure. It is a difficult problem for a satisfyall procedure to detect the case that a previous result can be reused. This paper shows that the case can be detected by comparing sets of undetermined variables and clauses. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can check more circuits than binary decision diagrambased and previous SATbased modelchecking algorithms. Index Terms—Boolean satisfiability checking (SAT), formal verification, symbol manipulation, symbolic model checking. I.