Abstract. The algebraic setting for threshold secret sharing scheme can vary, dependent on the application. This algebraic setting can limit the number of participants of an ideal secret sharing scheme. Thus it is important to know for which thresholds one could utilize an ideal threshold sharing scheme and for which thresholds one would have to use nonideal schemes. The implication is that more than one share may have to be dealt to some or all parties. Karnin, Greene and Hellman constructed several bounds concerning the maximal number of participants in threshold sharing scheme. There has been a number of researchers who have noted the relationship between k-arcs in projective spaces and ideal linear threshold secret schemes, as well as between MDS codes and ideal linear threshold secret sharing schemes. Further, researchers have constructed optimal bounds concerning the size of k-arcs in projective spaces, MDS codes, etc. for various finite fields. Unfortunately, the application of these results on the Karnin, Greene and Hellamn bounds has

Abstract. In [3] Damgard and Thorbek proposed the linear integer secret sharing (LISS) scheme. In this note we show that the LISS scheme can be made proactive. 1