Results 1 -
3 of
3
LeakSurvivor: Towards Safely Tolerating Memory Leaks for Garbage-Collected Languages
- In USENIX Annual Technical Conference
, 2008
"... Continuous memory leaks severely hurt program performance and software availability for garbage-collected programs. This paper presents a safe method, called LeakSurvivor, to tolerate continuous memory leaks at runtime for garbage-collected programs. Our main idea is to periodically swap out the “Po ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 9 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Continuous memory leaks severely hurt program performance and software availability for garbage-collected programs. This paper presents a safe method, called LeakSurvivor, to tolerate continuous memory leaks at runtime for garbage-collected programs. Our main idea is to periodically swap out the “Potentially Leaked ” (PL) memory objects identified by leak detectors from the virtual memory to disks. As a result, the virtual memory space occupied by the PL objects can be reclaimed by garbage collectors and available for future uses. If a swapped-out PL object is accesses later, LeakSurvivor will restore it from disks to the memory for correct program execution. Furthermore, LeakSurvivor helps developers to prune false positives. We have built the prototype of LeakSurvivor on top of Jikes RVM 2.4.2, a high performance Java-in-Java virtual machine developed by IBM. We conduct the experiments with three Java applications including Eclipse, SPECjbb2000 and Jigsaw. Among them, Eclipse and Jigsaw contain memory leaks introduced by their developers, while SPECjbb2000 contain a memory leak injected by us. Our results show that LeakSurvivor effectively tolerates memory leaks for two applications (Eclipse and SPECjbb2000), i.e., no cumulative performance degradation and no software failures when facing continuous memory leaks at runtime. For Jigsaw, LeakSurvivor extends the program lifetime by two times and improves the performance by 46 % compared with native runs. Furthermore, when there are no memory leaks, LeakSurvivor imposes small runtime overhead, i.e., 2.5 % over the leak detector and 23.7 % over the native runs. 1
Leak Pruning
- ASPLOS'09
, 2009
"... Managed languages improve programmer productivity with type safety and garbage collection, which eliminate memory errors such as dangling pointers, double frees, and buffer overflows. However, programs may still leak memory if programmers forget to eliminate the last reference to an object that will ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 8 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Managed languages improve programmer productivity with type safety and garbage collection, which eliminate memory errors such as dangling pointers, double frees, and buffer overflows. However, programs may still leak memory if programmers forget to eliminate the last reference to an object that will not be used again. Leaks slow programs by increasing collector workload and frequency. Growing leaks crash programs. Instead of crashing, leak pruning extends program availability by predicting and reclaiming leaked objects at run time. Whereas garbage collection over-approximates live objects using reachability, leak pruning predicts dead objects and reclaims them based on how stale they are and the size of stale data structures. Leak pruning preserves semantics because it waits for heap exhaustion before reclaiming objects and then poisons references to objects it reclaims. If the program later tries to access these objects, the virtual machine (VM) throws an internal error. We implement leak pruning in a Java VM, show its overhead is low, and evaluate it on 10 leaking programs. Leak pruning does not help two programs, executes four substantial programs 1.6-35X longer, and executes four programs, including two leaks in Eclipse, for at least 24 hours. In the worst case, leak pruning defers fatal errors. In the best case, programs with unbounded memory requirements execute indefinitely and correctly in bounded memory with consistent throughput.
Property Templates and Assertions Supporting Runtime Failure Detection
, 2008
"... In the context of our research program we addressed the question whether or not requirements documents contain information about system level properties that can be exploited to automatically create assertions for run-time checks of these properties. In this technical report we define the concept of ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In the context of our research program we addressed the question whether or not requirements documents contain information about system level properties that can be exploited to automatically create assertions for run-time checks of these properties. In this technical report we define the concept of property template and report details on the studies we carried out to address this question. The results are presented in the form of a catalog of property templates, and details from the individual studies showing which properties occur in which projects. 1

