Abstract: This is a history of relevant and substructural logics, written for the Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Logic, edited by Dov Gabbay and John Woods. 1 1

This is a description of the programming language Forsythe, which is a descendant of Algol 60 intended to be as uniform and general as possible, while retaining the basic character of its progenitor. This document supercedes Report CMU--CS--88--159, "Preliminary Design of the Programming Language Forsythe" [1]. c fl1996 John C. Reynolds Research suuported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-9409997. Keywords: Forsythe, Algol-like languages, Algol 60, intersection types 1. Introduction In retrospect, it is clear that Algol 60 [2, 3] was an heroic and surprisingly successful attempt to design a programming language from first principles. Its creation gave a formidable impetus to the development and use of theory in language design and implementation, which has borne rich fruit in the intervening thirty-six years. Most of this work has led to languages that are quite different than Algol 60, but there has been a continuing thread of concern with languages that retain the essentia...

In this paper the intersection type discipline as defined in [Barendregt et al. ’83] is studied. We will present two different and independent complete restrictions of the intersection type discipline. The first restricted system, the strict type assignment system, is presented in section two. Its major feature is the absence of the derivation rule (≤) and it is based on a set of strict types. We will show that these together give rise to a strict filter lambda model that is essentially different from the one presented in [Barendregt et al. ’83]. We will show that the strict type assignment system is the nucleus of the full system, i.e. for every derivation in the intersection type discipline there is a derivation in which (≤) is used only at the very end. Finally we will prove that strict type assignment is complete for inference semantics. The second restricted system is presented in section three. Its major feature is the absence of the type ω. We will show that this system gives rise to a filter λI-model and that type assignment without ω is complete for the λI-calculus. Finally we will prove that a lambda term is typeable in this system if and only if it is strongly normalizable.

representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.

This paper gives an overview of intersection type assignment for the Lambda Calculus, as well as compare in detail variants that have been defined in the past. It presents the essential intersection type assignment system, that will prove to be as powerful as the well-known BCD-system. It is essential in the following sense: it is an almost syntax directed system that satisfies all major properties of the BCDsystem, and the types used are the representatives of equivalence classes of types in the BCD-system. The set of typeable terms can be characterized in the same way, the system is complete with respect to the simple type semantics, and it has the principal type property.

Type systems based on intersection types have been studied extensively in recent years, both as tools for the analysis of the pure -calculus and, more recently, as the basis for practical programming languages. The dual notion, union types, also appears to have practical interest. For example, by refining types ordinarily considered as atomic, union types allow a restricted form of abstract interpretation to be performed during typechecking. The addition of second-order polymorphic types further increases the power of the type system, allowing interesting variants of many common datatypes to be encoded in the "pure" fragment with no type or term constants. This report summarizes a preliminary investigation of the expressiveness of a programming language combining intersection types, union types, and polymorphism.

We propose a refinement of the type theory underlying the LF logical framework by a form of subtypes and intersection types. This refinement preserves desirable features of LF, such as decidability of type-checking, and at the same time considerably simplifies the representations of many deductive systems. A subtheory can be applied directly to hereditary Harrop formulas which form the basis of Prolog and Isabelle. 1 Introduction Over the past two years we have carried out extensive experiments in the application of the LF Logical Framework [HHP93] to represent and implement deductive systems and their metatheory. Such systems arise naturally in the study of logic and the theory of programming languages. For example, we have formalized the operational semantics and type system of Mini-ML and implemented a proof of type preservation [MP91] and the correctness of a compiler to a variant of the Categorical Abstract Machine [HP92]. LF is based on a predicative type theory with dependent t...

this paper (Compagnoni, Intersection Types and Bounded Polymorphism 3 1994; Compagnoni, 1995) has been used in a type-theoretic model of object-oriented multiple inheritance (Compagnoni & Pierce, 1996). Related calculi combining restricted forms of intersection types with higher-order polymorphism and dependent types have been studied by Pfenning (Pfenning, 1993). Following a more detailed discussion of the pure systems of intersections and bounded quantification (Section 2), we describe, in Section 3, a typed -calculus called F ("Fmeet ") integrating the features of both. Section 4 gives some examples illustrating this system's expressive power. Section 5 presents the main results of the paper: a prooftheoretic analysis of F 's subtyping and typechecking relations leading to algorithms for checking subtyping and for synthesizing minimal types for terms. Section 6 discusses semantic aspects of the calculus, obtaining a simple soundness proof for the typing rules by interpreting types as partial equivalence relations; however, another proof-theoretic result, the nonexistence of least upper bounds for arbitrary pairs of types, implies that typed models may be more difficult to construct. Section 7 offers concluding remarks. 2. Background

We study the strict type assignment system, a restriction of the intersection type discipline [6], and prove that it has the principal type property. We define, for a term, the principal pair (of basis and type). We specify three operations on pairs, and prove that all pairs deducible for can be obtained from the principal one by these operations, and that these map deducible pairs to deducible pairs.

In prior work we introduced a pure type assignment system that encompasses a rich set of property types, including intersections, unions, and universally and existentially quantified dependent types. In this paper