In a standard Posner paradigm, participants were endogenously cued to attend to a peripheral location in visual space without making eye movements. They responded faster to target letters presented at cued than at uncued locations. On some trials, instead of a manual response, they had to move their eyes to a location in space. Results showed that the eyes deviated away from the validly cued location; when the cue was invalid and attention had to be allocated to the uncued location, eye movements also deviated away, but now from the uncued location. The extent to which the eyes deviated from cued and uncued locations was related to the dynamics of attention allocation. We hypothesized that this deviation was due to the successful inhibition of the attended location. The results imply that the oculomotor system is not only involved during the endogenous direction of covert attention to a cued location, but also when covert attention is directed to an uncued location. It appears that the oculomotor system is activated wherever spatial attention is allocated. The strength of saccade deviation might turn out to be an important measure for the amount of attention allocated to any particular location over time. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Posner and colleagues

In the present experiment, we investigated whether the memory of a location is affected by the occurrence of an irrelevant visual event. Participants had to memorize the location of a dot. During the retention interval, a task-irrelevant stimulus was presented with abrupt onset somewhere in the visual field. Results showed that the spatial memory representation was affected by the occurrence of the external irrelevant event relative to a control condition in which there was no external event. Specifically, the memorized location was shifted toward the location of the task-irrelevant stimulus. This effect was only present when the onset was close in space to the memory representation. These findings suggest that the “internal ” spatial map used for keeping a location in spatial working memory and the “external ” spatial map that is affected by exogenous events in the outside world are either the same or tightly linked. In everyday life, we constantly perform tasks for which it is necessary to keep relevant information temporarily in memory. It is thought that this information is kept active in a system referred to as working memory. Working memory was described by Baddeley (1986) as “a system for the temporary maintenance and manipulation of information, necessary for the performance of such complex cognitive activities as comprehension, learning and reasoning ” (p. 34). Baddeley and Hitch (1974) proposed a multiple-component model of working memory consisting of a “central executive ” and two “slave systems”: the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad. These slave systems are specialized in the processing and temporary storage of verbal and spatial information, respectively. The visuospatial sketchpad is less well understood than the phonological loop. Recent research suggests a strong link between spatial attention and visuospatial working memory (Awh & Jonides, 2001; Cowan et al., 2005;

Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements.

This study used a classic exogenous cueing task in which an abrupt onset cue indicated the target location at chance level. When there was a delay between the cue and the target, observers responded slower and less accurate to the target presented at cued than at uncued locations, signifying the occurrence of inhibition of return (IOR). On some trials, instead of a manual response, participants had to move their eyes to a location in space. Our findings show no saccade deviation away from the location that was inhibited due to IOR unless participants had to process the target letter presented at the inhibited location. Our findings are consistent with the notion that inhibition resulting in IOR does not occur at the saccade map level but IOR seems to reduce the input of signals going into the saccade map. We show that the strength of saccade deviation is an important measure which can reveal the amount of attentional processing taking place at any particular location in time.

Abstract not found

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actpsy