Results 1  10
of
359
Online Learning with Kernels
, 2003
"... Kernel based algorithms such as support vector machines have achieved considerable success in various problems in the batch setting where all of the training data is available in advance. Support vector machines combine the socalled kernel trick with the large margin idea. There has been little u ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2807 (126 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Kernel based algorithms such as support vector machines have achieved considerable success in various problems in the batch setting where all of the training data is available in advance. Support vector machines combine the socalled kernel trick with the large margin idea. There has been little use of these methods in an online setting suitable for realtime applications. In this paper we consider online learning in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space. By considering classical stochastic gradient descent within a feature space, and the use of some straightforward tricks, we develop simple and computationally efficient algorithms for a wide range of problems such as classification, regression, and novelty detection. In addition to allowing the exploitation of the kernel trick in an online setting, we examine the value of large margins for classification in the online setting with a drifting target. We derive worst case loss bounds and moreover we show the convergence of the hypothesis to the minimiser of the regularised risk functional. We present some experimental results that support the theory as well as illustrating the power of the new algorithms for online novelty detection. In addition
In defense of onevsall classification
 Journal of Machine Learning Research
, 2004
"... Editor: John ShaweTaylor We consider the problem of multiclass classification. Our main thesis is that a simple “onevsall ” scheme is as accurate as any other approach, assuming that the underlying binary classifiers are welltuned regularized classifiers such as support vector machines. This the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 312 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Editor: John ShaweTaylor We consider the problem of multiclass classification. Our main thesis is that a simple “onevsall ” scheme is as accurate as any other approach, assuming that the underlying binary classifiers are welltuned regularized classifiers such as support vector machines. This thesis is interesting in that it disagrees with a large body of recent published work on multiclass classification. We support our position by means of a critical review of the existing literature, a substantial collection of carefully controlled experimental work, and theoretical arguments.
Regularized multitask learning
, 2004
"... This paper provides a foundation for multi–task learning using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces of vector–valued functions. In this setting, the kernel is a matrix–valued function. Some explicit examples will be described which go beyond our earlier results in [7]. In particular, we characterize cl ..."
Abstract

Cited by 267 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper provides a foundation for multi–task learning using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces of vector–valued functions. In this setting, the kernel is a matrix–valued function. Some explicit examples will be described which go beyond our earlier results in [7]. In particular, we characterize classes of matrix– valued kernels which are linear and are of the dot product or the translation invariant type. We discuss how these kernels can be used to model relations between the tasks and present linear multi–task learning algorithms. Finally, we present a novel proof of the representer theorem for a minimizer of a regularization functional which is based on the notion of minimal norm interpolation. 1
Recognizing Imprecisely Localized, Partially Occluded and Expression Variant Faces from a Single Sample per Class
, 2002
"... The classical way of attempting to solve the face (or object) recognition problem is by using large and representative datasets. In many applications though, only one sample per class is available to the system. In this contribution, we describe a probabilistic approach that is able to compensate fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 212 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The classical way of attempting to solve the face (or object) recognition problem is by using large and representative datasets. In many applications though, only one sample per class is available to the system. In this contribution, we describe a probabilistic approach that is able to compensate for imprecisely localized, partially occluded and expression variant faces even when only one single training sample per class is available to the system. To solve the localization problem, we find the subspace (within the feature space, e.g. eigenspace) that represents this error for each of the training images. To resolve the occlusion problem, each face is divided into k local regions which are analyzed in isolation. In contrast with other approaches, where a simple voting space is used, we present a probabilistic method that analyzes how "good" a local match is. To make the recognition system less sensitive to the differences between the facial expression displayed on the training and the testing images, we weight the results obtained on each local area on the bases of how much of this local area is affected by the expression displayed on the current test image.
The Entire Regularization Path for the Support Vector Machine
, 2004
"... The Support Vector Machine is a widely used tool for classification. Many efficient implementations exist for fitting a twoclass SVM model. The user has to supply values for the tuning parameters: the regularization cost parameter, and the kernel parameters. It seems a common practice is to use a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 198 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The Support Vector Machine is a widely used tool for classification. Many efficient implementations exist for fitting a twoclass SVM model. The user has to supply values for the tuning parameters: the regularization cost parameter, and the kernel parameters. It seems a common practice is to use a default value for the cost parameter, often leading to the least restrictive model. In this paper we argue that the choice of the cost parameter can be critical. We then derive an algorithm that can fit the entire path of SVM solutions for every value of the cost parameter, with essentially the same computational cost as fitting one SVM model. We illustrate our algorithm on some examples, and use our representation to give further insight into the range of SVM solutions.
1norm Support Vector Machines
 Neural Information Processing Systems
, 2003
"... The standard 2norm SVM is known for its good performance in twoclass classification. In this paper, we consider the 1norm SVM. We argue that the 1norm SVM may have some advantage over the standard 2norm SVM, especially when there are redundant noise features. We also propose an efficient alg ..."
Abstract

Cited by 171 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The standard 2norm SVM is known for its good performance in twoclass classification. In this paper, we consider the 1norm SVM. We argue that the 1norm SVM may have some advantage over the standard 2norm SVM, especially when there are redundant noise features. We also propose an efficient algorithm that computes the whole solution path of the 1norm SVM, hence facilitates adaptive selection of the tuning parameter for the 1norm SVM.
The mathematics of learning: Dealing with data
 Notices of the American Mathematical Society
, 2003
"... Draft for the Notices of the AMS Learning is key to developing systems tailored to a broad range of data analysis and information extraction tasks. We outline the mathematical foundations of learning theory and describe a key algorithm of it. 1 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 167 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Draft for the Notices of the AMS Learning is key to developing systems tailored to a broad range of data analysis and information extraction tasks. We outline the mathematical foundations of learning theory and describe a key algorithm of it. 1
Proximal support vector machine classifiers
 Proceedings KDD2001: Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
, 2001
"... Abstract—A new approach to support vector machine (SVM) classification is proposed wherein each of two data sets are proximal to one of two distinct planes that are not parallel to each other. Each plane is generated such that it is closest to one of the two data sets and as far as possible from the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 152 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract—A new approach to support vector machine (SVM) classification is proposed wherein each of two data sets are proximal to one of two distinct planes that are not parallel to each other. Each plane is generated such that it is closest to one of the two data sets and as far as possible from the other data set. Each of the two nonparallel proximal planes is obtained by a single MATLAB command as the eigenvector corresponding to a smallest eigenvalue of a generalized eigenvalue problem. Classification by proximity to two distinct nonlinear surfaces generated by a nonlinear kernel also leads to two simple generalized eigenvalue problems. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by tests on simple examples as well as on a number of public data sets. These examples show the advantages of the proposed approach in both computation time and test set correctness. Index Terms—Support vector machines, proximal classification, generalized eigenvalues. 1
The Kernel Recursive Least Squares Algorithm
 IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
, 2003
"... We present a nonlinear kernelbased version of the Recursive Least Squares (RLS) algorithm. Our KernelRLS (KRLS) algorithm performs linear regression in the feature space induced by a Mercer kernel, and can therefore be used to recursively construct the minimum mean squared error regressor. Spars ..."
Abstract

Cited by 138 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present a nonlinear kernelbased version of the Recursive Least Squares (RLS) algorithm. Our KernelRLS (KRLS) algorithm performs linear regression in the feature space induced by a Mercer kernel, and can therefore be used to recursively construct the minimum mean squared error regressor. Sparsity of the solution is achieved by a sequential sparsification process that admits into the kernel representation a new input sample only if its feature space image cannot be suffciently well approximated by combining the images of previously admitted samples. This sparsification procedure is crucial to the operation of KRLS, as it allows it to operate online, and by effectively regularizing its solutions. A theoretical analysis of the sparsification method reveals its close affinity to kernel PCA, and a datadependent loss bound is presented, quantifying the generalization performance of the KRLS algorithm. We demonstrate the performance and scaling properties of KRLS and compare it to a stateof theart Support Vector Regression algorithm, using both synthetic and real data. We additionally test KRLS on two signal processing problems in which the use of traditional leastsquares methods is commonplace: Time series prediction and channel equalization.
Kernel Logistic Regression and the Import Vector Machine
 Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
, 2001
"... The support vector machine (SVM) is known for its good performance in binary classification, but its extension to multiclass classification is still an ongoing research issue. In this paper, we propose a new approach for classification, called the import vector machine (IVM), which is built on ker ..."
Abstract

Cited by 117 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The support vector machine (SVM) is known for its good performance in binary classification, but its extension to multiclass classification is still an ongoing research issue. In this paper, we propose a new approach for classification, called the import vector machine (IVM), which is built on kernel logistic regression (KLR). We show that the IVM not only performs as well as the SVM in binary classification, but also can naturally be generalized to the multiclass case. Furthermore, the IVM provides an estimate of the underlying probability. Similar to the "support points" of the SVM, the IVM model uses only a fraction of the training data to index kernel basis functions, typically a much smaller fraction than the SVM. This gives the IVM a computational advantage over the SVM, especially when the size of the training data set is large. 1