Results 1 
3 of
3
Proving existential theorems when importing results from MDG to HOL
 TPHOLS 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS, INFORMATIC RESEARCH REPORT EDIINFRR0046
, 2001
"... An existential theorem, for the specification or implementation of hardware, states that for any inputs there must exist at least one output which is consistent with it. It is proved to prevent an inconsistent model being produced and it is required to formally import the verification result from on ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
An existential theorem, for the specification or implementation of hardware, states that for any inputs there must exist at least one output which is consistent with it. It is proved to prevent an inconsistent model being produced and it is required to formally import the verification result from one verification system to another system. In this paper, we investigate the verification of the existential theorems of hardware specifications and implementations. Whilst much of the approach is generally applicable, we specifically consider a hybrid system linking the MDG hardware verification system with the HOL interactive proof system. We investigate existential theorems based on the syntax and semantics of the MDG input language (MDGHDL) in HOL. We define an output representation for each component in the MDGHDL component library. We summarize a general method which is used to prove the existential theorem for any MDGHDL program. The method can also be used to solve other existentially quantified goals.
Providing a Formal Linkage between MDG and HOL
, 2002
"... We describe an approach for formally verifying the linkage between a symbolic state enumeration system and a theorem proving system. This involves the following three stages of proof. Firstly we prove theorems about the correctness of the translation part of the symbolic state system. It interface ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe an approach for formally verifying the linkage between a symbolic state enumeration system and a theorem proving system. This involves the following three stages of proof. Firstly we prove theorems about the correctness of the translation part of the symbolic state system. It interfaces between low level decision diagrams and high level description languages. We ensure that the semantics of a program is preserved in those of its translated form. Secondly we prove linkage theorems: theorems that justify introducing a result from a state enumeration system into a proof system. Finally we combine the translator correctness and linkage theorems. The resulting new linkage theorems convert results to a high level language from the low level decision diagrams that the result was actually proved about in the state enumeration system.They justify importing lowlevel external verification results into a theorem prover. We use a linkage between the HOL system and a simplified version of the MDG system to illustrate the ideas and consider a small example that integrates two applications from MDG and HOL to illustrate the linkage theorems.