Results 1  10
of
16
Approximating Maximum Weight Matching in Nearlinear Time
"... Given a weighted graph, the maximum weight matching problem (MWM) is to find a set of vertexdisjoint edges with maximum weight. In the 1960s Edmonds showed that MWMs can be found in polynomial time. At present the fastest MWM algorithm, due to Gabow and Tarjan, runs in Õ(m √ n) time, where m and n ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Given a weighted graph, the maximum weight matching problem (MWM) is to find a set of vertexdisjoint edges with maximum weight. In the 1960s Edmonds showed that MWMs can be found in polynomial time. At present the fastest MWM algorithm, due to Gabow and Tarjan, runs in Õ(m √ n) time, where m and n are the number of edges and vertices in the graph. Surprisingly, restricted versions of the problem, such as computing (1 − ɛ)approximate MWMs or finding maximum cardinality matchings, are not known to be much easier (on sparse graphs). The best algorithms for these problems also run in Õ(m √ n) time. In this paper we present the first nearlinear time algorithm for computing (1 − ɛ)approximate MWMs. Specifically, given an arbitrary realweighted graph and ɛ> 0, our algorithm computes such a matching in O(mɛ −2 log 3 n) time. The previous best approximate MWM algorithm with comparable running time could only guarantee a (2/3 − ɛ)approximate solution. In addition, we present a faster algorithm, running in O(m log n log ɛ −1) time, that computes a (3/4−ɛ)approximate MWM.
A scaling algorithm for maximum weight matching in bipartite graphs
 IN: PROCEEDINGS 23RD ACMSIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS (SODA
"... Given a weighted bipartite graph, the maximum weight matching (MWM) problem is to find a set of vertexdisjoint edges with maximum weight. We present a new scaling algorithm that runs in O(m √ n log N) time, when the weights are integers within the range of [0, N]. The result improves the previous b ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Given a weighted bipartite graph, the maximum weight matching (MWM) problem is to find a set of vertexdisjoint edges with maximum weight. We present a new scaling algorithm that runs in O(m √ n log N) time, when the weights are integers within the range of [0, N]. The result improves the previous bounds of O(Nm √ n) by Gabow and O(m √ n log (nN)) by Gabow and Tarjan over 20 years ago. Our improvement draws ideas from a not widely known result, the primal method by Balinski and Gomory.
Navigating Central Path with Electrical Flows: From Flows to Matchings, and Back
 FOCS
, 2013
"... We present an Õ(m ..."
(Show Context)
Scaling algorithms for approximate and exact maximum weight matching
, 2011
"... The maximum cardinality and maximum weight matching problems can be solved in time Õ(m √ n), a bound that has resisted improvement despite decades of research. (Here m and n are the number of edges and vertices.) In this article we demonstrate that this “m √ n barrier ” is extremely fragile, in the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The maximum cardinality and maximum weight matching problems can be solved in time Õ(m √ n), a bound that has resisted improvement despite decades of research. (Here m and n are the number of edges and vertices.) In this article we demonstrate that this “m √ n barrier ” is extremely fragile, in the following sense. For any ɛ> 0, we give an algorithm that computes a (1 − ɛ)approximate maximum weight matching in O(mɛ −1 log ɛ −1) time, that is, optimal linear time for any fixed ɛ. Our algorithm is dramatically simpler than the best exact maximum weight matching algorithms on general graphs and should be appealing in all applications that can tolerate a negligible relative error. Our second contribution is a new exact maximum weight matching algorithm for integerweighted bipartite graphs that runs in time O(m √ n log N). This improves on the O(Nm √ n)time and O(m √ n log(nN))time algorithms known since the mid 1980s, for 1 ≪ log N ≪ log n. Here N is the maximum integer edge weight. 1
Graph Connectivities, Network Coding, and Expander Graphs
 Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS
, 2011
"... Abstract — We present a new algebraic formulation to compute edge connectivities in a directed graph, using the ideas developed in network coding. This reduces the problem of computing edge connectivities to solving systems of linear equations, thus allowing us to use tools in linear algebra to desi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — We present a new algebraic formulation to compute edge connectivities in a directed graph, using the ideas developed in network coding. This reduces the problem of computing edge connectivities to solving systems of linear equations, thus allowing us to use tools in linear algebra to design new algorithms. Using the algebraic formulation we obtain faster algorithms for computing single source edge connectivities and all pairs edge connectivities, in some settings the amortized time to compute the edge connectivity for one pair is sublinear. Through this connection, we have also found an interesting use of expanders and superconcentrators to design fast algorithms for some graph connectivity problems. 1.
Fast matrix rank algorithms and applications
 In Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC
, 2012
"... We consider the problem of computing the rank of an m × n matrix A over a field. We present a randomized algorithm to find a set of r = rank(A) linearly independent columns in Õ(A  + r ω) field operations, where A  denotes the number of nonzero entries in A and ω < 2.38 is the matrix multipli ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We consider the problem of computing the rank of an m × n matrix A over a field. We present a randomized algorithm to find a set of r = rank(A) linearly independent columns in Õ(A  + r ω) field operations, where A  denotes the number of nonzero entries in A and ω < 2.38 is the matrix multiplication exponent. Previously the best known algorithm to find a set of r linearly independent columns is by Gaussian elimination, with running time O(mnr ω−2). Our algorithm is faster when r < max{m, n}, for instance when the matrix is rectangular. We also consider the problem of computing the rank of a matrix dynamically, supporting the operations of rank one updates and additions and deletions of rows and columns. We present an algorithm that updates the rank in Õ(mn) field operations. We show that these algorithms can be used to obtain faster algorithms for various problems in numerical linear algebra, combinatorial optimization and dynamic data structure.
Efficient algorithms for maximum weight matchings in general graphs with small edge weights
 in: Proceedings 23rd ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA
"... Let G = (V, E) be a graph with positive integral edge weights. Our problem is to find a matching of maximum weight in G. We present a simple iterative algorithm for this problem that uses a maximum cardinality matching algorithm as a subroutine. Using the current fastest maximum cardinality matching ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Let G = (V, E) be a graph with positive integral edge weights. Our problem is to find a matching of maximum weight in G. We present a simple iterative algorithm for this problem that uses a maximum cardinality matching algorithm as a subroutine. Using the current fastest maximum cardinality matching algorithms, we solve the maximum weight matching problem in O(W √ nm logn(n 2 /m)) time, or in O(W n ω) time with high probability, where n = V , m = E, W is the largest edge weight, and ω < 2.376 is the exponent of matrix multiplication. In relatively dense graphs, our algorithm performs better than all existing algorithms with W = o(log 1.5 n). Our technique hinges on exploiting Edmonds ’ matching polytope and its dual. 1
LinearTime Approximation for Maximum Weight Matching
"... The maximum cardinality and maximum weight matching problems can be solved in Ã(mân) time, a bound that has resisted improvement despite decades of research. (Here m and n are the number of edges and vertices.) In this article, we demonstrate that this âm â n barrier â can be bypassed by ap ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The maximum cardinality and maximum weight matching problems can be solved in Ã(mân) time, a bound that has resisted improvement despite decades of research. (Here m and n are the number of edges and vertices.) In this article, we demonstrate that this âm â n barrier â can be bypassed by approximation. For any É> 0, we give an algorithm that computes a (1 â É)approximate maximum weight matching in O(mÉâ1 log Éâ1) time, that is, optimal linear time for any fixed É. Our algorithm is dramatically simpler than the best exact maximum weight matching algorithms on general graphs and should be appealing in all applications that can tolerate a negligible relative error.
Bodyandcad geometric constraint systems
"... Motivated by constraintbased CAD software, we introduce a new, very general, rigidity model: the bodyandcad structure, composed of rigid bodies in 3D constrained by pairwise coincidence, angle and distance constraints. We have identified 21 relevant geometric constraints and a new, necessary, b ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Motivated by constraintbased CAD software, we introduce a new, very general, rigidity model: the bodyandcad structure, composed of rigid bodies in 3D constrained by pairwise coincidence, angle and distance constraints. We have identified 21 relevant geometric constraints and a new, necessary, but not sufficient, counting condition for minimal rigidity of bodyandcad structures: nested sparsity. We remark that the classical bodyandbar rigidity model can be viewed as a bodyandcad structure that uses only one constraint from this new set of constraints. 1.