Results 1 - 10
of
340
The Making of Class and Gender through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation
- Sociology
, 2005
"... This article explores how white working-class women are figured as the constitu-tive limit – in proximity – to national public morality. It is argued that four pro-cesses: increased ambivalence generated by the reworking of moral boundaries; new forms of neo-liberal governance in which the use of cu ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 29 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This article explores how white working-class women are figured as the constitu-tive limit – in proximity – to national public morality. It is argued that four pro-cesses: increased ambivalence generated by the reworking of moral boundaries; new forms of neo-liberal governance in which the use of culture is seen as a form of personal responsibility by which new race relations are formed; new ways of investing in one’s self as a way of generating exchange-value via affects and display; and the shift to compulsory individuality are reshaping class relations via the mak-ing of the self. By showing and telling themselves in public white working-class women are forced to display their ‘lack ’ of moral value according to the symbolic values generated by the above processes. It is a no-win situation for them unless we shift our perspective from exchange-value to use-value.
Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society.
- Business Ethics Quarterly,
, 2005
"... Abstract: This paper investigates whether, in theoretical terms, corporations can be citizens. The argument is based on the observation that the debate on "corporate citizenship" (CC) has only paid limited attention to the actual notion of citizenship. Where it has been discussed, authors ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: This paper investigates whether, in theoretical terms, corporations can be citizens. The argument is based on the observation that the debate on "corporate citizenship" (CC) has only paid limited attention to the actual notion of citizenship. Where it has been discussed, authors have either largely left the concept of CC unquestioned, or applied rather unidimensional and decontextualized notions of citizenship to the corporate sphere. The paper opens with a critical discussion of a major contribution to the CC literature, the work of Logsdon and Wood
Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
, 1999
"... McGowan, Dean Neu, Tony Tinker and two unnamed reviewers on this paper. Particular thanks go to ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
McGowan, Dean Neu, Tony Tinker and two unnamed reviewers on this paper. Particular thanks go to
Recognition without Ethics
- Theory, Culture & Society
, 2001
"... FOR SOME time now, the forces of progressive politics have beendivided into two camps. On one side stand the proponents of ‘redistri-bution’. Drawing on long traditions of egalitarian, labor and socialist organizing, political actors aligned with this orientation seek a more just allocation of resou ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
FOR SOME time now, the forces of progressive politics have beendivided into two camps. On one side stand the proponents of ‘redistri-bution’. Drawing on long traditions of egalitarian, labor and socialist organizing, political actors aligned with this orientation seek a more just allocation of resources and goods. On the other side stand the proponents of ‘recognition’. Drawing on newer visions of a ‘difference-friendly ’ society, they seek a world where assimilation to majority or dominant cultural norms is no longer the price of equal respect. Members of the first camp hope to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, from the North to the South, and from the owners to the workers. Members of the second, in contrast, seek recognition of the distinctive perspectives of ethnic, ‘racial’, and sexual minorities, as well as of gender difference. The redistribution orientation has a distinguished philosophical pedigree, as egalitarian redistributive claims have supplied the paradigm case for most theorizing about social justice for the past 150 years. The recognition orientation has recently attracted the interest of political philosophers, however, some of whom are seeking to develop a new normative paradigm that puts recognition at its center.
Building Value-Based Partnerships: Toward Solidarity With Oppressed Groups
"... We propose a value-based conceptualization of partnership, defining partnership as relationships between community psychologists, oppressed groups, and other stakeholders, which strive to achieve key community psychology values (caring, compassion, community, health, self-determination, participatio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We propose a value-based conceptualization of partnership, defining partnership as relationships between community psychologists, oppressed groups, and other stakeholders, which strive to achieve key community psychology values (caring, compassion, community, health, self-determination, participation, power-sharing, human diversity, and social justice). These values guide partnership work related to the development of services or supports, coalitions and social action, and community research and program evaluation. We prescribe guidelines for building such partnerships and conclude by considering some of the challenges in implementing value-based partnerships. KEY WORDS: partnerships; solidarity; oppression; values. With the current focus on “tax reflief ” and resultant cutbacks to the public sector in North America (see Barlow & Campbell, 1995, for a discussion of the Canadian scene), there are increasing calls for partnerships in services and supports (Pace & Turkel, 1990), community coalitions and social action (Chavis, 1995; Labonté, 1993), and community research and program evaluation (Matheson, 1994). This may account for at least some of the motivation
Teacher identity as pedagogy: Towards a field-internal conceptualisation in bilingual and second language education
- International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
, 2004
"... This article explores the transformative potential of a teacher’s identity in the context of bilingual and second language education (SLE) programmes. The rst section examines several theoretical options by which this potential might be conceptual-ised. Drawing on post-structural notions of discours ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This article explores the transformative potential of a teacher’s identity in the context of bilingual and second language education (SLE) programmes. The rst section examines several theoretical options by which this potential might be conceptual-ised. Drawing on post-structural notions of discourse, subjectivity and performa-tivity, the author emphasises the contingent and relational processes through which teachers and students come to understand themselves and negotiate their varying roles in language classrooms. Simon’s (1995) notion of an ‘image-text ’ further develops this dynamic, co-constructed understanding and shifts it more specically towards pedagogical applications: the strategic performance of a teacher’s identity in ways that counteract stereotypes held by a particular group of students. These post-structural ideas on teachers ’ identities are then evaluated in reference to the knowledge base of bilingual and SLE. The author then proposes a ‘eld-internal ’ conceptualisation by which such theories might be rooted in the types of practices characteristic of language education programmes. The next section of the article describes the author’s personal efforts to realise these concepts in practice. ‘Gong Li – Brian’s Imaginary Lover ’ is a story of how the author’s identity became a classroom resource, a text to be performed in ways that challenged group assump-tions around culture, gender, and family roles in a community, adult ESL pro-gramme serving mostly Chinese seniors in Toronto.
Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference
- Psychological Inquiry
, 2010
"... A deep concern with how race and ethnicity make a difference for behavior has always fueled social psychology. This concern is now more necessary and relevant than ever. The first decade of the 21st century is characterized by an increasingly complicated set of racial issues invigorated by a steady ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
A deep concern with how race and ethnicity make a difference for behavior has always fueled social psychology. This concern is now more necessary and relevant than ever. The first decade of the 21st century is characterized by an increasingly complicated set of racial issues invigorated by a steady flow of immigrants, deeply entrenched racial disparities, vastly divergent views on race-related events and policies, and a concomitant, growing sentiment that recent political events have erased the problems of race in the United States. As demographics change and as select members of underrepresented groups achieve positions of power, how will individuals and communities make sense of this diversity? Can they do so without turning a blind eye to racial inequality? Why and how will difference make a difference? The ability of social psychology to address this complicated set of issues rests in part on its ability to continue to develop a science of diversity that adopts a sociocultural understanding of racial inequality-one that recognizes the intertwined roles of cultural and structural realities (i.e., cultural beliefs and social positioning) in shaping intergroup relations. 1 The central, but often ignored, insight of this approach is that intergroup relations do not occur in a vacuum. They unfold with certain cultural understandings about what race is and how difference should be understood and dealt with. Accordingly, these ways of thinking about difference and whether this difference matters help people not only to make sense of racial realities but also to reinforce them. A diversity science must therefore be able and willing to avoid employing and perpetuating an abstract conception of race; to locate the sources of inequality not only in individual minds but also in the practices, policies, and institutions that they create; and to unearth cultural ideologies that 1 There are many types of diversity. For the purposes of this article, I focus almost exclusively on racial and ethnic diversity within the United States.
Racial Conflict and the Malignancy of Identity
- Journal of Economic Inequality
, 2005
"... This paper demonstrates how our sense of identity can emerge out of mere markers of social distinction that may have no innate significance, but, nevertheless, spread to various aspects of our lives and be the root of conflict. The basis of such conflicts could arise from the use of race to form con ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 15 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper demonstrates how our sense of identity can emerge out of mere markers of social distinction that may have no innate significance, but, nevertheless, spread to various aspects of our lives and be the root of conflict. The basis of such conflicts could arise from the use of race to form conditional judgments about people’s behavior. Moreover, there are contexts where racial conflict is inevitable even though, if individuals had common knowledge of one another’s preferences, there would be no conflict. It is argued that this kind of conflict, where many individuals have no innate aggressive preference, is widespread and understanding the process that gives rise to such conflict is the key to crafting effective policy that contains it. JEL classification numbers:
2000) Negotiating Extra-Territorial Citizenship: Mexican Migration and the Transnational Politics of Community. La Jolla, CA: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies
"... The dominant model of modern liberal citizenship, in which political identity and membership are congruent with the state’s territory, is increasingly unable to resolve the contradictions created by global mass migration. While scholars have studied this problem from the perspective of immigrant-rec ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 13 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The dominant model of modern liberal citizenship, in which political identity and membership are congruent with the state’s territory, is increasingly unable to resolve the contradictions created by global mass migration. While scholars have studied this problem from the perspective of immigrant-receiving countries, they have paid little attention to citizenship models that would explain how migrants relate to their sending countries. This paper draws on evidence from ethnographic fieldwork in Michoacán, Mexico, and Southern California to propose a process-based model of extra-te ritorial citizenship in which migrants claim citizenship in their places of origin, even when they are physically absent. Migrants make these claims through public displays in sending communities and in their interactions with Mexican political institutions and the Catholic Church. Legal rights of citizenship, such as voting from abroad, and a kind of moral citizenship in communities of origin share similar theoretical principles. Extra-territori l citizenship appeals to a Roman model of citizenship. A Greek model of citizenship rejects extra-territorial citizenship based on the implausibility of daily participation in the public life of the community without a physical presence. Both forms of citizenship are negotiated with non-migrants who selectively accept or reject the principles of extra-territ rial citizenship. While I develop this model based on the experiences of particular migrant communities, the model may be applicable to other migration contexts.
Global cities and diasporic networks: Microsites in global civil society. Global civil society. 2002;2002:217
"... Globalisation and the international human rights regime have contributed to the creation of operational and legal openings for nonstate actors to enter international arenas that were once the exclusive domain of national states. Various, often as yet very minor, developments signal that the state is ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 11 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Globalisation and the international human rights regime have contributed to the creation of operational and legal openings for nonstate actors to enter international arenas that were once the exclusive domain of national states. Various, often as yet very minor, developments signal that the state is no longer the exclusive subject of international law or the only actor in international relations. Other actors—from NGOs and indigenous peoples to immigrants and refugees who become subjects of adjudication in human rights decisions— are increasingly emerging as subjects of international law and actors in international relations. That is to say, these non-state actors can gain visibility in international fora as individuals and as collectivities,