• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Agreements for software reuse in corporations (2013)

by T de Gooijer, H Koziolek
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 1 of 1

H.: Customizing domain analysis for assessing the reuse potential of industrial software systems

by Dominik Domis, Stephan Sehestedt, Thomas Gamer, Markus Aleksy, Heiko Koziolek - In: Proc. 18th Internal Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2014), Industry Track. ACM (2014
"... In companies with a large portfolio of software or software-intensive products, functional overlaps are often perceived between independent products. In such situations it is ad-visable to systematically analyze the potential of systematic reuse and Software Product Lines. To this end, several do-ma ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
In companies with a large portfolio of software or software-intensive products, functional overlaps are often perceived between independent products. In such situations it is ad-visable to systematically analyze the potential of systematic reuse and Software Product Lines. To this end, several do-main analysis approaches, e.g., SEI Technical Probe, have been proposed to decide whether a set of products with a perceived functional overlap should be integrated into a sin-gle product line. Based on the principles of those approaches we devised our own approach. One important property is the inherent flexibility of the method to be able to apply it to four different application cases in industrial software products at ABB. In this paper we present our refined ap-proach for domain analysis. The results and lessons learned are meant to support industrial researchers and practition-ers alike. Moreover, the lessons learned highlight real-world findings concerning software reuse.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... politically unbiased and is able to align the requirements and expectations of the different product units. 4) The funding of the development and maintenance of reusable artifacts needs to be set up =-=[24]-=-. 5) Previous negative experience increases reluctance for reuse, i.e., seeing only additional efforts and overhead, but not the overall benefits. This must be addressed very early by transparency and...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University