• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Abduction and induction from a non-monotonic reasoning perspective. In: Abduction and Induction: (2000)

by N Lachiche
Venue:Essays on their Relation and Integration,
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 7 of 7

A case for abductive reasoning over ontologies.

by C Elsenbroich, O Kutz, U Sattler - In Proceedings of OWL: Experiences and Directions. , 2006
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 44 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Logical Characterisations Of Inductive Learning

by Peter A. Flach , 2000
"... This chapter presents a logical analysis of induction. Contrary to common approaches to inductive logic that treat inductive validity as a real-valued generalisation of deductive validity, we argue that the only logical step in induction lies in hypothesis generation rather than evaluation. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 13 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
This chapter presents a logical analysis of induction. Contrary to common approaches to inductive logic that treat inductive validity as a real-valued generalisation of deductive validity, we argue that the only logical step in induction lies in hypothesis generation rather than evaluation.

Inverse Entailment for Full Clausal Theories

by Katsumi Inoue - In: LICS-2001 Workshop on Logic and Learning , 2001
"... This paper shows a sound and complete method for inverse entailment in inductive logic programming. We show that inverse entailment can be computed with a resolution method for consequencefinding. In comparison with previous work, induction via consequence-finding is sound and complete for finding h ..."
Abstract - Cited by 6 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This paper shows a sound and complete method for inverse entailment in inductive logic programming. We show that inverse entailment can be computed with a resolution method for consequencefinding. In comparison with previous work, induction via consequence-finding is sound and complete for finding hypotheses from full clausal theories, and can be used for inducing not only definite clauses but also non-Horn clauses and integrity constraints.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

.... That is, given a background theory B and observations (or positive examples) E, the task of induction and abduction is common in finding hypotheses H such that BsH j= E; (1) where BsH is consistent =-=[7, 3, 6, 10]-=-. While the logic is in common, they differ in the usage in applications. According to Peirce, abduction infers a cause of an observation, and can infer something quite different from what is observed...

Collaborative Inductive Logic Programming for Path Planning

by Jian Huang, Adrian R. Pearce
"... In distributed systems, learning does not necessarily involve the participation of agents directly in the inductive process itself. Instead, many systems frequently employ multiple instances of induction separately. In this paper, we develop and evaluate a new approach for learning in distributed sy ..."
Abstract - Cited by 4 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
In distributed systems, learning does not necessarily involve the participation of agents directly in the inductive process itself. Instead, many systems frequently employ multiple instances of induction separately. In this paper, we develop and evaluate a new approach for learning in distributed systems that tightly integrates processes of induction between agents, based on inductive logic programming techniques. The paper’s main contribution is the integration of an epistemic approach to reasoning about knowledge with inverse entailment during induction. The new approach facilitates a systematic approach to the sharing of knowledge and invention of predicates only when required. We illustrate the approach using the well-known path planning problem and compare results empirically to (multiple instances of) single agent-based induction over varying distributions of data. Given a chosen path planning algorithm, our algorithm enables agents to combine their local knowledge in an effective way to avoid central control while significantly reducing communication costs. 1

Brave Induction Revisited

by Jianmin Ji
"... Abstract. Sakama and Inoue introduced brave induction as a novel logic framework for concept-learning. They showed that brave induction has potential applications for problem solving in many domains. In this paper, motivated from Shapiro's definition of model inference problems, we provide an ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Sakama and Inoue introduced brave induction as a novel logic framework for concept-learning. They showed that brave induction has potential applications for problem solving in many domains. In this paper, motivated from Shapiro's definition of model inference problems, we provide an optimization of brave induction called proper brave induction, which prefers hypotheses resulting fewer minimal models. We first propose formal definitions of proper brave induction for clausal theories and nonmonotonic logic programs, then investigate corresponding properties and develop an optimization procedure. At last, we analyze computational complexity of decision problems for proper brave induction in propositional case.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...e the sufficient condition for the existence of solutions in brave induction. 6 Related Work In previous sections, we provided an optimization of brave induction called proper brave induction and compared it with brave induction in Proposition 5. From the discussion in [14], a solution of explanatory induction is always a solution of brave induction and a solution of brave induction is a solution of LFS. Then a solution of proper brave induction is always a solution of LFS. Similar to brave induction, proper brave induction is neither stronger nor weaker than LFI [3] or confirmatory induction [6]. Notice that, the idea of proper brave induction can also be extended to these logic frameworks of induction. On the other hand, there has been much work on induction in nonmonotonic logic programs. Otero [10] and Sakama [13] extended the definition of ILP to the stable model semantics and introduced frameworks for learning positive/negative examples in NLPs. Ray [12] developed a nonmonotonic ILP system, called XHAIL, which combines abduction and induction for constructing hypotheses. ASPAL [2], another nonmonotonic ILP system, uses ASP as a solver to compute a solution to a standard ILP task...

Dual Aspects of Abduction and Induction

by Flavio Zelazek
"... Abstract. A new characterization of abduction and induction is proposed, which is based on the idea that the various aspects of the two kinds of inference rest on the essential features of increment of (so to speak, extensionalized) comprehension and, respectively, of extension of the terms involved ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A new characterization of abduction and induction is proposed, which is based on the idea that the various aspects of the two kinds of inference rest on the essential features of increment of (so to speak, extensionalized) comprehension and, respectively, of extension of the terms involved. These two essential features are in a reciprocal relation of duality, whence the highlighting of the dual aspects of abduction and induction. Remarkably, the increment of comprehension and of extension are dual ways to realize, in the limit, a `deductivization ' of abduction and induction in a similar way as the Closed World Assumption does in the case of the latter.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...rows in induction and abduction is linked with completion or circumscription techniques, so basically with the Closed World Assumption. On this point an interesting analysis has been made by Lachiche =-=[13]-=-. 3 Conclusions and Further Research The present view of induction and abduction is an `incremental' one: we increase the number of tests up to the limiting point in which all of the relevant subjects...

Toward Inductive Logic Programming for Collaborative Problem Solving

by unknown authors
"... Abstract — In this paper, we tackle learning in distributed systems and the fact that learning does not necessarily involve the participation of agents directly in the inductive process itself. Instead, many systems frequently employ multiple instances of induction separately. The paper’s main contr ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract — In this paper, we tackle learning in distributed systems and the fact that learning does not necessarily involve the participation of agents directly in the inductive process itself. Instead, many systems frequently employ multiple instances of induction separately. The paper’s main contribution is a new approach that tightly integrates processes of induction between distributed agents, based on inductive logic programming techniques, for a wider class of problem solving tasks. The approach combines inverse entailment with an epistemic approach to reasoning about knowledge, facilitating a systematic approach to the sharing of knowledge and invention of predicates only when required. We illustrate the approach for learning declarative program fragments and for a well-known path planning problem and compare results empirically to (multiple instances of) single agent-based induction over varying distributions of data. Given a chosen path planning algorithm, our algorithm enables agents to combine their local knowledge in an effective way to avoid central control while significantly reducing communication costs. I.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... [12] given that it integrates deduction and induction to constrain explanations. Consequently, the kind of induction we tackle can also be viewed as abduction, or explanatory induction as defined in =-=[13]-=-, as opposed to the (harder to compute) descriptive induction. Since ILP, in the limit, can be intractable unless the search is effectively constrained, traditional implementations of ILP frequently r...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2016 The Pennsylvania State University