Results 1 -
9 of
9
The Complexity of Stochastic Sequences
- In Conference on Computational Complexity 2003
, 2003
"... We observe that known results on the Kolmogorov complexity of pre xes of eectively stochastic sequences extend to corresponding random sequences. First, there are recursively random random sequences such that for any nondecreasing and unbounded computable function f and for almost all n, the unifor ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 8 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We observe that known results on the Kolmogorov complexity of pre xes of eectively stochastic sequences extend to corresponding random sequences. First, there are recursively random random sequences such that for any nondecreasing and unbounded computable function f and for almost all n, the uniform complexity of the length n pre x of the sequence is bounded by f(n). Second, a similar result with bounds of the form f(n) log n holds for partial-recursively random sequences.
Why Computational Complexity Requires Stricter Martingales
"... The word "martingale " has related, but different, meanings in probability theory and theoretical computer science. In computational complexity and algorithmic information theory, a martingale is typically a function d on strings such that E(d(wb)|w) = d(w) for all strings w, where the c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The word "martingale " has related, but different, meanings in probability theory and theoretical computer science. In computational complexity and algorithmic information theory, a martingale is typically a function d on strings such that E(d(wb)|w) = d(w) for all strings w, where the conditional expectation is computed over all possible values of the next symbol b. In modern probability theory a martingale is typically a sequence,0,,1,,2,... of random variables such that E(,n+1|,0,...,,n) =,n for all n.
Feasible Depth
"... Abstract. This paper introduces two complexity-theoretic formulations of Bennett’s computational depth: finite-state depth and polynomial-time depth. It is shown that for both formulations, trivial and random infinite sequences are shallow, and a slow growth law holds, implying that deep sequences c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper introduces two complexity-theoretic formulations of Bennett’s computational depth: finite-state depth and polynomial-time depth. It is shown that for both formulations, trivial and random infinite sequences are shallow, and a slow growth law holds, implying that deep sequences cannot be created easily from shallow sequences. Furthermore, the E analogue of the halting language is shown to be polynomial-time deep, by proving a more general result: every language to which a nonnegligible subset of E can be reduced in uniform exponential time is polynomial-time deep.
Separations of non-monotonic randomness notions
, 907
"... Abstract. In the theory of algorithmic randomness, several notions of random sequence are defined via a game-theoretic approach, and the notions that received most attention are perhaps Martin-Löf randomness and computable randomness. The latter notion was introduced by Schnorr and is rather natural ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In the theory of algorithmic randomness, several notions of random sequence are defined via a game-theoretic approach, and the notions that received most attention are perhaps Martin-Löf randomness and computable randomness. The latter notion was introduced by Schnorr and is rather natural: an infinite binary sequence is computably random if no total computable strategy succeeds on it by betting on bits in order. However, computably random sequences can have properties that one may consider to be incompatible with being random, in particular, there are computably random sequences that are highly compressible. The concept of Martin-Löf randomness is much better behaved in this and other respects, on the other hand its definition in terms of martingales is considerably less natural. Muchnik, elaborating on ideas of Kolmogorov and Loveland, refined Schnorr’s model by also allowing non-monotonic strategies, i.e. strategies that do not bet on bits in order. The subsequent “non-monotonic ” notion of randomness, now called Kolmogorov-Loveland-randomness, has been shown to be quite close to Martin-Löf randomness, but whether these two classes coincide remains a fundamental open question. In order to get a better understanding of non-monotonic randomness notions, Miller and Nies introduced some interesting intermediate concepts, where one only allows non-adaptive strategies, i.e., strategies that can still bet non-monotonically, but such that the sequence of betting positions is known in advance (and computable). Recently, these notions were shown by Kastermans and Lempp to differ from Martin-Löf randomness. We continue the study of the non-monotonic randomness notions introduced by Miller and Nies and obtain results about the Kolmogorov complexities of initial segments that may and may not occur for such sequences, where these results then imply a complete classification of these randomness notions by order of strength. 1
DOI 10.1007/s00224-009-9171-0 Depth as Randomness Deficiency
, 2009
"... Abstract Depth of an object concerns a tradeoff between computation time and excess of program length over the shortest program length required to obtain the object. It gives an unconditional lower bound on the computation time from a given program in absence of auxiliary information. Variants known ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract Depth of an object concerns a tradeoff between computation time and excess of program length over the shortest program length required to obtain the object. It gives an unconditional lower bound on the computation time from a given program in absence of auxiliary information. Variants known as logical depth and computational depth are expressed in Kolmogorov complexity theory. We derive quantitative relation between logical depth and computational depth and unify the different depth notions by relating them to A. Kolmogorov and L. Levin’s fruitful notion of randomness deficiency. Subsequently, we revisit the computational The authors from University of Porto are partially supported by KCrypt (POSC/EIA/60819/2004) and funds granted to LIACC through the Programa de Financiamento Plurianual, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Programa POSI.
A General Notion of Useful Information
"... In this paper we introduce a general framework for defining the depth of a sequence with respect to a class of observers. We show that our general framework captures all depth notions introduced in complexity theory so far. We review most such notions, show how they are particular cases of our gener ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper we introduce a general framework for defining the depth of a sequence with respect to a class of observers. We show that our general framework captures all depth notions introduced in complexity theory so far. We review most such notions, show how they are particular cases of our general depth framework, and review some classical results about the different depth notions. Key words: Bennett’s logical depth, computable depth 1
Bounded Randomness ⋆
"... Abstract. We introduce some new variations of the notions of being Martin-Löf random where the tests are all clopen sets. We explore how these randomness notions relate to classical randomness notions and to degrees of unsolvability. 1 ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We introduce some new variations of the notions of being Martin-Löf random where the tests are all clopen sets. We explore how these randomness notions relate to classical randomness notions and to degrees of unsolvability. 1
Reconciling Data Compression and . . .
"... While data compression and Kolmogorov complexity are both about effective coding of words, the two settings differ in the following respect. A compression algorithm or compressor, for short, has to map a word to a unique code for this word in one shot, whereas with the standard notions of Kolmogor ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
While data compression and Kolmogorov complexity are both about effective coding of words, the two settings differ in the following respect. A compression algorithm or compressor, for short, has to map a word to a unique code for this word in one shot, whereas with the standard notions of Kolmogorov complexity a word has many different codes and the minimum code for a given word cannot be found effectively. This gap is bridged by introducing decidable Turing machines and a corresponding notion of Kolmogorov complexity, where compressors and suitably normalized decidable machines are essentially the same concept. Kolmogorov complexity defined via decidable machines yields characterizations in terms of the intial segment complexity of sequences of the concepts of Martin-Löf randomness, Schnorr randomness, Kurtz randomness, and computable dimension. These results can also be reformulated in terms of time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity. Other applications of decidable machines are presented, such as a simplified proof of the Miller-Yu theorem (characterizing Martin-Löf randomness by the plain complexity of the initial segments) and a new characterization of computably traceable sequences via a natural lowness notion for decidable machines.

