Results 1 -
5 of
5
A Separator Theorem for Planar Graphs f
, 1977
"... Let G be any n-vertex planar graph. We prove that the vertices of G can be partitioned into three sets A, B, C such that no edge joins a vertex in A with a vertex in B, neither A nor B contains more than 2n/3 vertices, and C contains no more than 2& & vertices. We exhibit an algorithm which finds su ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 338 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Let G be any n-vertex planar graph. We prove that the vertices of G can be partitioned into three sets A, B, C such that no edge joins a vertex in A with a vertex in B, neither A nor B contains more than 2n/3 vertices, and C contains no more than 2& & vertices. We exhibit an algorithm which finds such a partition A, B, C in O(n) time.
How Good is Recursive Bisection?
- SIAM J. Sci. Comput
, 1995
"... . The most commonly used p-way partitioning method is recursive bisection (RB). It first divides a graph or a mesh into two equal sized pieces, by a "good" bisection algorithm, and then recursively divides the two pieces. Ideally, we would like to use an optimal bisection algorithm. Because the opti ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 62 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
. The most commonly used p-way partitioning method is recursive bisection (RB). It first divides a graph or a mesh into two equal sized pieces, by a "good" bisection algorithm, and then recursively divides the two pieces. Ideally, we would like to use an optimal bisection algorithm. Because the optimal bisection problem, that partitions a graph into two equal sized subgraphs to minimize the number of edges cut, is NP-complete, practical RB algorithms use more efficient heuristics in place of an optimal bisection algorithm. Most such heuristics are designed to find the best possible bisection within allowed time. We show that the recursive bisection method, even when an optimal bisection algorithm is assumed, may produce a p-way partition that is very far way from the optimal one. Our negative result is complemented by two positive ones: First we show that for some important classes of graphs that occur in practical applications, such as well-shaped finite element and finite difference...
Communication complexity of simultaneous messages
- SIAM Journal on Computing
"... In the multiparty communication game (CFL-game) of Chandra, Furst, and Lipton (Proc. 15th ACM STOC, 1983, 94–99) k players collaboratively evaluate a function f(x0,..., xk−1) in which player i knows all inputs except xi. The players have unlimited computational power. The objective is to minimize co ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 12 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In the multiparty communication game (CFL-game) of Chandra, Furst, and Lipton (Proc. 15th ACM STOC, 1983, 94–99) k players collaboratively evaluate a function f(x0,..., xk−1) in which player i knows all inputs except xi. The players have unlimited computational power. The objective is to minimize communication. In this paper, we study the Simultaneous Messages (SM) model of multiparty communication complexity. The SM model is a restricted version of the CFL-game in which the players are not allowed to communicate with each other. Instead, each of the k players simultaneously sends a message to a referee, who sees none of the inputs. The referee then announces the function value. We prove lower and upper bounds on the SM-complexity of several classes of explicit functions. Our lower bounds extend to randomized SM complexity via an entropy argument. A lemma establishing a tradeoff between average Hamming distance and range size for transformations of the Boolean cube might be of independent interest. Our lower bounds on SM-complexity imply an exponential gap between the SM-model and
On Separators, Segregators and Time versus Space
"... We give the first extension of the result due to Paul, Pippenger, Szemeredi and Trotter [24] that deterministic linear time is distinct from nondeterministic linear time. We show that N T IM E(n ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We give the first extension of the result due to Paul, Pippenger, Szemeredi and Trotter [24] that deterministic linear time is distinct from nondeterministic linear time. We show that N T IM E(n

