The seemingly effortless ability to perceive meaningful objects in an integrated scene actually depends on complex visual processes. The `binding problem' concerns the way in which we select and integrate the separate features of objects in the correct combinations. Experiments suggest that attention plays a central role in solving this problem. Some neurological patients show a dramatic breakdown in the ability to see several objects; their deficits suggest a role for the parietal cortex inthe binding process. However, indirect measures of priming and interference suggest that more information may be implicitly available than we can consciously access.

Neural correlates of perceptual awareness, until very recently an elusive quarry, are now almost commonplace findings. This article first describes a variety of neural correlates of perceptual awareness based on fMRI, ERPs, and single-unit recordings. It is then argued that our quest should ultimately focus not on mere correlates of awareness, but rather on the neural events that are both necessary and sufficient for perceptual awareness. Indeed, preliminary evidence suggests that although many of the neural correlates already reported may be necessary for the corresponding state of awareness, it is unlikely that they are sufficient for it. The final section considers three hypotheses concerning the possible sufficiency conditions

Abstract not found

When presented with a red T and a green O, observers occasionally make conjunction responses and indicate that they saw a green T. These errors have been interpreted as reflecting separable processing stages of feature detection and integration with the illusory conjunctions arising from a failure at the integration stage. Recently, M. Donk (1999) asserted that the phenomenon of illusory conjunctions is an artifact. Conjunction reports are actually the result of confusing a nontarget item (O in the example above) for a target item (the letter 7} and (correctly) reporting the color associated with the (incorrectly) selected target. The authors demonstrate that although target-nontarget confusion errors are a potential source of conjunction reports, there is a plethora of findings that cannot be accounted for by this confusion model. A review of the literature indicates that in many studies, illusory conjunctions do result from a failure to properly integrate features. Many theories of object recognition emphasize that perception involves an analytic process in which image components are initially extracted and then integrated to form coherent objects. Critical components have been variously described in terms of spatial frequencies (e.g., De Valois & De Valois, 1980), geons

Extinction is manifested in conditions of bilateral simultaneous stimulation, as a failure to detect the stimulus contra-lateral to the side of a cerebral lesion, while the same stimulus is correctly detected there when presented in isolation. The phenomenon is usually interpreted in terms of impaired mobilization of attention from an attended to an unattended object. We have recently shown, using pairs of Gabor patches as stimuli, that pair detection is maximally improved in conditions where the two stimuli presented simultaneously to the two halves of the visual # eld are co-oriented and co-axial and their location is not too eccentric. Here we add new information by showing that contrast isotropy of the stimulus pair is important in producing this orientation-similarity gain. The further advantage of co-oriented co-linear stimuli over co-oriented parallel (vertical) stimuli was shown exclusively with iso-contrast stimulus pairs, and was signi# cantly enhanced when the contrast level of the stimulus pair was low. Stimulus properties producing reduced extinction seem to correlate with the selectivity pattern and contrast dependence of (a) spatial lateral facilitation observed in psychophysical studies with normal observers, and (b) long-range interactions observed in the primary visual cortex. Thus, two remote visual stimuli seem to be processed as a single object when the corresponding neuronal activities are linked via long-range lateral interactions. The present demonstration of contrast dependency in such processing, strengthens our previous conjecture that even in the presence of signi# cant, extinction producing, parietal damage, the primary visual cortex preserves the capacity to encode, using long-range lateral interactions, an image description in which visual...

Abstract not found

stages of visual processing, where most is known about

Cross-modal illusory conjunctions (ICs) happen when, under conditions of divided attention, felt textures are reported as being seen or vice versa. Experiments provided evidence for these errors, demonstrated that ICs are more frequent if tactile and visual stimuli are in the same hemispace, and showed that ICs still occur under forced-choice conditions but do not occur when attention to the felt texture is increased. Cross-modal ICs were also found in a patient with parietal damage even with relatively long presentations of visual stimuli. The data are consistent with there being cross-modal integration of sensory information, with the modality of origin sometimes being misattributed when attention is constrained. The empirical conclusions from the experiments are supported by formal models. There is increasing experimental evidence that perceptual processing within one modality can be influenced by stimuli presented within another modality. For instance, studies of attentional cuing show that cues presented in one modality (e.g., touch) can influence the speed of responding to stimuli presented in a different

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

is provided in screen-viewable form for personal use only by members