Results 1 - 10
of
13
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, 2004
"... The research reported in this paper focussed on the design of learning environments that support the teaching and learning of argumentation in a scientific context. The research took place over two years between 1999 and 2001 in junior high schools in the greater London area. The research was conduc ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 88 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The research reported in this paper focussed on the design of learning environments that support the teaching and learning of argumentation in a scientific context. The research took place over two years between 1999 and 2001 in junior high schools in the greater London area. The research was conducted in two phases. In the first developmental phase, working with a group of 12 science teachers, the main emphasis was to develop sets of materials and strategies to support argumentation in the classroom and to assess teachers ‘ development with teaching argumentation. Data were collected by videoing and audio recording the teachers attempts to implement these lessons at the beginning and end of the year. During this phase, analytical tools for evaluating the quality of argumentation were developed based on Toulmin‘s argument pattern. Analysis of the data shows that there was significant development in the majority of teachers use of argumentation across the year. Results indicate that the pattern of use of argumentation is teacher specific, as is the nature of the change. In the second phase of the project, teachers taught the experimental groups a minimum of nine lessons which involved socioscientific or scientific argumentation. In addition, these teachers taught similar lessons to a control group at the beginning and end of the year. Here the emphasis lay on assessing the progression in student capabilities with argumentation. Hence data were collected from several lessons of two groups of students engaging in argumentation. Using a framework for evaluating the nature of the discourse and its quality, the findings show that there was an improvement in the quality of students ‘ argumentation. In addition, the research offers methodological developments for work in this field.
Reason!: Improving Informal Reasoning Skills
- In Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference
, 2000
"... The goal of the Reason! project is to develop an effective and affordable method for improving informal reasoning. In this paper we sketch the background to the project, briefly describe the Reason! software, and report positive results from a detailed study of the first full-scale trial. Introducti ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The goal of the Reason! project is to develop an effective and affordable method for improving informal reasoning. In this paper we sketch the background to the project, briefly describe the Reason! software, and report positive results from a detailed study of the first full-scale trial. Introduction One of the greatest challenges facing the Australian educational system in the coming years is to substantially improve higher-order cognitive skills. We need to continually improve what we do in the classroom so that students at all levels will be better able to cope with the demands of employment in the Knowledge Economy. At the same time, however, our resources seem to be constantly dwindling. Many people hope that creative use of information technology will help bridge this gap. The Reason! project at the University of Melbourne is addressing the problem of general informal reasoning---roughly, how to think through complex issues such as how to vote in the republicanism referendum, o...
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
"... Towards a more social ..."
(Show Context)
oro.open.ac.uk Journal of Applied Linguistics
"... and other research outputs Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy Journal Article ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
and other research outputs Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy Journal Article
Mar. 2007, Volume 4, No.3 (Serial No.28) US-China Education Review, ISSN1548-6613, USA Undergraduates and the development of argument
"... Abstract: This article emphasizes the need to encourage undergraduate students to develop arguments, which involves enhancing their analytical skills and capacity for critical thinking, across disciplines regardless of level. It argues that these skills, required by the Quality Assurance Agency’s (Q ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: This article emphasizes the need to encourage undergraduate students to develop arguments, which involves enhancing their analytical skills and capacity for critical thinking, across disciplines regardless of level. It argues that these skills, required by the Quality Assurance Agency’s (QAA) benchmarks, are developed not by instruction but by engaging with the philosophic process that leads to the deep learning. This process of learning is based on a dialectical approach, viewing dialogue with colleagues, primary texts and written assignments, as central to developing an inductive argument and a critical perspective. This article proposes an analytical framework to analyze the extent to which a tutor is facilitating the development of argument. It suggests that while, if required one must provide students with explicit guidelines about this process, nevertheless this practice is problematic because of the inherent tension between explicit teaching and deep learning, which facilitates the acquisition of these analytical skills. Key words: analytical skills; critical thinking; deduction; deep learning; development of argument; dialectic; explicit teaching; formative assessment; induction; implicit teaching
1 The End of the Essay?
"... There is no doubt that the essay is a noble and well-established genre in higher education, at least in the ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
There is no doubt that the essay is a noble and well-established genre in higher education, at least in the
USING CMC TO DEVELOP ARGUMENTATION 1 RACHEL PILKINGTON AND AISHA WALKER USING CMC TO DEVELOP ARGUMENTATION SKILLS
"... Constructive argumentation is a process of confronting cognitions – it is a process of deliberating between participants ’ diverse positions and reasons for believing in them (see Andriessesn, Suthers & Baker, this volume). This chapter is concerned with how we create learning communities that e ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Constructive argumentation is a process of confronting cognitions – it is a process of deliberating between participants ’ diverse positions and reasons for believing in them (see Andriessesn, Suthers & Baker, this volume). This chapter is concerned with how we create learning communities that enable children to express and confront their
unknown title
"... www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev South African teachers ’ ability to argue: The emergence of inclusive argumentation ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev South African teachers ’ ability to argue: The emergence of inclusive argumentation
Undergraduates and the development of argument
"... Abstract: This article emphasizes the need to encourage undergraduate students to develop arguments, which involves enhancing their analytical skills and capacity for critical thinking, across disciplines regardless of level. It argues that these skills, required by the Quality Assurance Agency’s (Q ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: This article emphasizes the need to encourage undergraduate students to develop arguments, which involves enhancing their analytical skills and capacity for critical thinking, across disciplines regardless of level. It argues that these skills, required by the Quality Assurance Agency’s (QAA) benchmarks, are developed not by instruction but by engaging with the philosophic process that leads to the deep learning. This process of learning is based on a dialectical approach, viewing dialogue with colleagues, primary texts and written assignments, as central to developing an inductive argument and a critical perspective. This article proposes an analytical framework to analyze the extent to which a tutor is facilitating the development of argument. It suggests that while, if required one must provide students with explicit guidelines about this process, nevertheless this practice is problematic because of the inherent tension between explicit teaching and deep learning, which facilitates the acquisition of these analytical skills. Key words: analytical skills; critical thinking; deduction; deep learning; development of argument; dialectic; explicit teaching; formative assessment; induction; implicit teaching 1.