Results 1 -
2 of
2
An efficient threshold public key cryptosystem secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack
, 1999
"... Abstract. This paper proposes a simple threshold Public-Key Cryptosystem (PKC) which is secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack, under the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) intractability assumption. Previously, it was shown how to design non-interactive threshold PKC secure under chosen ciph ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 53 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper proposes a simple threshold Public-Key Cryptosystem (PKC) which is secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack, under the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) intractability assumption. Previously, it was shown how to design non-interactive threshold PKC secure under chosen ciphertext attack, in the random-oracle model and under the DDH intractability assumption [25]. The random-oracle was used both in the proof of security and to eliminate interaction. General completeness results for multi-party computations [6,13] enable in principle converting any single server PKC secure against CCA (e.g., [19,17]) into a threshold one, but the conversions are inefficient and require much interaction among the servers for each ciphertext decrypted. The recent work by Cramer and Shoup [17] on single server PKC secure against adaptive CCA is the starting point for the new proposal. 1
Secure Computation with Honest-Looking Parties: What if nobody is truly honest? (Extended Abstract)
- 31st Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), ACM
, 1999
"... ) Ran Canetti Rafail Ostrovsky y April 28, 1999 Abstract In a secure multi-party computation a set of mutually distrustful parties interact in order to evaluate a pre-defined function of their inputs, without revealing the inputs to each other. In this scenario, the trust in other parties shoul ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 8 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
) Ran Canetti Rafail Ostrovsky y April 28, 1999 Abstract In a secure multi-party computation a set of mutually distrustful parties interact in order to evaluate a pre-defined function of their inputs, without revealing the inputs to each other. In this scenario, the trust in other parties should be minimal. In the classic formulation of this problem, most of the parties are trusted to exactly follow the prescribed protocol, except for a limited number of parties that are corrupted by a centralized adversary and are allowed to deviate from the protocol in an arbitrary way. However, an assumption of a totally honest behavior of most parties can not be verified. In particular, if an "honest-looking" party diverges from its protocol in a way that is indistinguishable from a totally honest player, it can do so with "impunity". In this paper, we consider the situation where all parties (even uncorrupted ones) may deviate from their protocol in arbitrary ways, under the sole restriction ...

