Term Rewriting Systems play an important role in various areas, such as abstract data type specifications, implementations of functional programming languages and automated deduction. In this chapter we introduce several of the basic comcepts and facts for TRS's. Specifically, we discuss Abstract Reduction Systems

In ordinary lambda calculus the occurrences of a bound variable are made recognizable by the use of one and the same (otherwise irrelevant) name at all occurrences. This convention is known to cause considerable trouble in cases of substitution. In the present paper a different notational system is developed, where occurrences of variables are indicated by integers giving the "distance" to the binding lambda instead of a name attached to that lambda. The system is claimed to be efficient for automatic formula manipulation as well as for metalingual discussion. As an example the most essential part of a proof of the Church-Rosser theorem is presented in this name free calculus.

edited by P. Braffort and D. Hirshberg and published by North-Holland.

Abstract not found

Categorical combinators [12, 21, 43] and more recently oe-calculus [1, 23], have been introduced to provide an explicit treatment of substitutions in the -calculus. We reintroduce here the ingredients of these calculi in a self-contained and stepwise way, with a special emphasis on confluence properties. The main new results of the paper w.r.t. [12, 21, 1, 23] are the following: 1. We present a confluent weak calculus of substitutions, where no variable clashes can be feared. 2. We solve a conjecture raised in [1]: oe-calculus is not confluent (it is confluent on ground terms only). This unfortunate result is "repaired" by presenting a confluent version of oe-calculus, named the Env-calculus in [23], called here the confluent oe-calculus.

Abstract not found

this article.

representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.

Interprocessor communication (PC) overheads have emerged as the major performance limitation in parallel processing systems, due to the transmission delays, synchronization overheads, and conflicts for shared communication resources created by data exchange. Accounting for these overheads is essential for attaining efficient hardware utilization. This thesis introduces two new compile-time heuristics for scheduling precedence graphs onto multiprocessor architectures, which account for interprocessor communication overheads and interconnection constraints in the architecture. These algorithms perform scheduling and routing simultaneously to account for irregular interprocessor interconnections, and schedule all communications as well as all computations to eliminate shared resource contention. The first technique, called dynamic-level scheduling, modifies the classical HLFET list scheduling strategy to account for IPC and synchronization overheads. By using dynamically changing priorities to match nodes and processors at each step, this technique attains an equitable tradeoff between load balancing and interprocessor communication cost. This method is fast, flexible, widely targetable, and displays promising perforrnance. The second technique, called declustering, establishes a parallelism hierarchy upon the precedence graph using graph-analysis techniques which explicitly address the tradeoff between exploiting parallelism and incurring communication cost. By systematically decomposing this hierarchy, the declustering process exposes parallelism instances in order of importance, assuring efficient use of the available processing resources. In contrast with traditional clustering schemes, this technique can adjust the level of cluster granularity to suit the characteristics of the specified architecture, leading to a more effective solution.

Expansion trees are defined as generalizations of Herbrand instances for formulas in a nonextensional form of higher-order logic based on Church’s simple theory of types. Such expansion trees can be defined with or without the use of skolem functions. These trees store substitution terms and either critical variables or skolem terms used to instantiate quantifiers in the original formula and those resulting from instantiations. An expansion tree is called an expansion tree proof (ET-proof) if it encodes a tautology, and, in the form not using skolem functions, an “imbedding ” relation among the critical variables be acyclic. The relative completeness result for expansion tree proofs not using skolem functions, i.e. if A is provable in higher-order logic then A has such an expansion tree proof, is based on Andrews ’ formulation of Takahashi’s proof of the cut-elimination theorem for higher-order logic. If the occurrences of skolem functions in instantiation terms are restricted appropriately, the use of skolem functions in place of critical variables is equivalent to the requirement that the imbedding relation is acyclic. This fact not only resolves the open question of what