Results 1 - 10
of
402
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
, 2008
"... We seek to build a large collection of images with ground truth labels to be used for object detection and recognition research. Such data is useful for supervised learning and quantitative evaluation. To achieve this, we developed a web-based tool that allows easy image annotation and instant sha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 670 (47 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We seek to build a large collection of images with ground truth labels to be used for object detection and recognition research. Such data is useful for supervised learning and quantitative evaluation. To achieve this, we developed a web-based tool that allows easy image annotation and instant sharing of such annotations. Using this annotation tool, we have collected a large dataset that spans many object categories, often containing multiple instances over a wide variety of images. We quantify the contents of the dataset and compare against existing state of the art datasets used for object recognition and detection. Also, we show how to extend the dataset to automatically enhance object labels with WordNet, discover object parts, recover a depth ordering of objects in a scene, and increase the number of labels using minimal user supervision and images from the web.
The 2005 pascal visual object classes challenge
, 2006
"... Abstract. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge ran from February to March 2005. The goal of the challenge was to recognize objects from a number of visual object classes in realistic scenes (i.e. not pre-segmented objects). Four object classes were selected: motorbikes, bicycles, cars and peop ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 633 (24 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge ran from February to March 2005. The goal of the challenge was to recognize objects from a number of visual object classes in realistic scenes (i.e. not pre-segmented objects). Four object classes were selected: motorbikes, bicycles, cars and people. Twelve teams entered the challenge. In this chapter we provide details of the datasets, algorithms used by the teams, evaluation criteria, and results achieved. 1
The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) challenge
, 2009
"... ... is a benchmark in visual object category recognition and detection, providing the vision and machine learning communities with a standard dataset of images and annotation, and standard evaluation procedures. Organised annually from 2005 to present, the challenge and its associated dataset has be ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 624 (20 self)
- Add to MetaCart
... is a benchmark in visual object category recognition and detection, providing the vision and machine learning communities with a standard dataset of images and annotation, and standard evaluation procedures. Organised annually from 2005 to present, the challenge and its associated dataset has become accepted as the benchmark for object detection. This paper describes the dataset and evaluation procedure. We review the state-of-the-art in evaluated methods for both classification and detection, analyse whether the methods are statistically different, what they are learning from the images (e.g. the object or its context), and what the methods find easy or confuse. The paper concludes with lessons learnt in the three year history of the challenge, and proposes directions for future improvement and extension.
Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms
- IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, 2007
"... Abstract—We introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating b ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 388 (48 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract—We introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating between a template matching and a maximum pooling operation. We demonstrate the strength of the approach on a range of recognition tasks: From invariant single object recognition in clutter to multiclass categorization problems and complex scene understanding tasks that rely on the recognition of both shape-based as well as texture-based objects. Given the biological constraints that the system had to satisfy, the approach performs surprisingly well: It has the capability of learning from only a few training examples and competes with state-of-the-art systems. We also discuss the existence of a universal, redundant dictionary of features that could handle the recognition of most object categories. In addition to its relevance for computer vision, the success of this approach suggests a plausibility proof for a class of feedforward models of object recognition in cortex.
Learning object categories from google’s image search
- In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision
, 2005
"... Current approaches to object category recognition require datasets of training images to be manually prepared, with varying degrees of supervision. We present an approach that can learn an object category from just its name, by uti-lizing the raw output of image search engines available on the Inter ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 315 (20 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Current approaches to object category recognition require datasets of training images to be manually prepared, with varying degrees of supervision. We present an approach that can learn an object category from just its name, by uti-lizing the raw output of image search engines available on the Internet. We develop a new model, TSI-pLSA, which extends pLSA (as applied to visual words) to include spa-tial information in a translation and scale invariant man-ner. Our approach can handle the high intra-class vari-ability and large proportion of unrelated images returned by search engines. We evaluate the models on standard test sets, showing performance competitive with existing meth-ods trained on hand prepared datasets. 1.
In Defense of Nearest-Neighbor Based Image Classification
"... State-of-the-art image classification methods require an intensive learning/training stage (using SVM, Boosting, etc.) In contrast, non-parametric Nearest-Neighbor (NN) based image classifiers require no training time and have other favorable properties. However, the large performance gap between th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 263 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
State-of-the-art image classification methods require an intensive learning/training stage (using SVM, Boosting, etc.) In contrast, non-parametric Nearest-Neighbor (NN) based image classifiers require no training time and have other favorable properties. However, the large performance gap between these two families of approaches rendered NNbased image classifiers useless. We claim that the effectiveness of non-parametric NNbased image classification has been considerably undervalued. We argue that two practices commonly used in image classification methods, have led to the inferior performance of NN-based image classifiers: (i) Quantization of local image descriptors (used to generate “bags-of-words”, codebooks). (ii) Computation of ‘Image-to-Image ’ distance, instead of ‘Image-to-Class ’ distance. We propose a trivial NN-based classifier – NBNN, (Naive-Bayes Nearest-Neighbor), which employs NNdistances in the space of the local image descriptors (and not in the space of images). NBNN computes direct ‘Imageto-Class’ distances without descriptor quantization. We further show that under the Naive-Bayes assumption, the theoretically optimal image classifier can be accurately approximated by NBNN. Although NBNN is extremely simple, efficient, and requires no learning/training phase, its performance ranks among the top leading learning-based image classifiers. Empirical comparisons are shown on several challenging databases (Caltech-101,Caltech-256 and Graz-01). 1.
Discriminative models for multi-class object layout
"... Many state-of-the-art approaches for object recognition reduce the problem to a 0-1 classification task. Such reductions allow one to leverage sophisticated classifiers for learning. These models are typically trained independently for each class using positive and negative examples cropped from ima ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 200 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Many state-of-the-art approaches for object recognition reduce the problem to a 0-1 classification task. Such reductions allow one to leverage sophisticated classifiers for learning. These models are typically trained independently for each class using positive and negative examples cropped from images. At test-time, various post-processing heuristics such as non-maxima suppression (NMS) are required to reconcile multiple detections within and between different classes for each image. Though crucial to good performance on benchmarks, this post-processing is usually defined heuristically. We introduce a unified model for multi-class object recognition that casts the problem as a structured prediction task. Rather than predicting a binary label for each image
LOCUS: Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation
- in ICCV
, 2005
"... We address the problem of learning object class models and object segmentations from unannotated images. We introduce LOCUS (Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation) which uses a generative probabilistic model to combine bottom-up cues of color and edge with top-down cues of shape and ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 199 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We address the problem of learning object class models and object segmentations from unannotated images. We introduce LOCUS (Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation) which uses a generative probabilistic model to combine bottom-up cues of color and edge with top-down cues of shape and pose. A key aspect of this model is that the object appearance is allowed to vary from image to image, allowing for significant within-class variation. By iteratively updating the belief in the object’s position, size, segmentation and pose, LOCUS avoids making hard decisions about any of these quantities and so allows for each to be refined at any stage. We show that LOCUS successfully learns an object class model from unlabeled images, whilst also giving segmentation accuracies that rival existing supervised methods. Finally, we demonstrate simultaneous recognition and segmentation in novel images using the learned models for a number of object classes, as well as unsupervised object discovery and tracking in video. 1.
Multiclass object recognition with sparse, localized features
- IN: CVPR
, 2006
"... We apply a biologically inspired model of visual object recognition to the multiclass object categorization problem. Our model modifies that of Serre, Wolf, and Poggio. As in that work, we first apply Gabor filters at all positions and scales; feature complexity and position/scale invariance are the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 197 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We apply a biologically inspired model of visual object recognition to the multiclass object categorization problem. Our model modifies that of Serre, Wolf, and Poggio. As in that work, we first apply Gabor filters at all positions and scales; feature complexity and position/scale invariance are then built up by alternating template matching and max pooling operations. We refine the approach in several bi-ologically plausible ways, using simple versions of sparsi-fication and lateral inhibition. We demonstrate the value of retaining some position and scale information above the in-termediate feature level. Using feature selection we arrive at a model that performs better with fewer features. Our final model is tested on the Caltech 101 object categories and the UIUC car localization task, in both cases achieving state-of-the-art performance. The results strengthen the case for using this class of model in computer vision.
Discovering object categories in image collections
, 2004
"... Given a set of images containing multiple object categories, we seek to discover those categories and their image locations without supervision. We achieve this using generative models from the statistical text literature: probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA), and Latent Dirichlet Allocatio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 192 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Given a set of images containing multiple object categories, we seek to discover those categories and their image locations without supervision. We achieve this using generative models from the statistical text literature: probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA), and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). In text analysis these are used to discover topics in a corpus using the bag-of-words document representation. Here we discover topics as object categories, so that an image containing instances of several categories is modelled as a mixture of topics. The models are applied to images by using a visual analogue of a word, formed by vector quantizing SIFT like region descriptors. We investigate a set of increasingly demanding scenarios, starting with image sets containing only two object categories through to sets containing multiple categories (including airplanes, cars, faces, motorbikes, spotted cats) and background clutter. The object categories sample both intra-class and scale variation, and both the categories and their approximate spatial layout are found without supervision. We also demonstrate classification of unseen images and images containing multiple objects. Performance of the proposed unsupervised method is compared to the semi-supervised approach of [7].
