Results 11 - 20
of
196
A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization
, 1994
"... Abstract. A general model for the coevolution of cooperating species is presented. This model is instantiated and tested in the domain of function optimization, and compared with a traditional GA-based function optimizer. The results are encouraging in two respects. They suggest ways in which the pe ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 131 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A general model for the coevolution of cooperating species is presented. This model is instantiated and tested in the domain of function optimization, and compared with a traditional GA-based function optimizer. The results are encouraging in two respects. They suggest ways in which the performance of GA and other EA-based optimizers can be improved, and they suggest a new approach to evolving complex structures such as neural networks and rule sets. 1
Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms: Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems
- Evolutionary Computation
, 1999
"... In this paper, we study the problem features that may cause a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) difficulty in converging to the true Pareto-optimal front. Identification of such features helps us develop difficult test problems for multi-objective optimization. Multi-objective test problems ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 126 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we study the problem features that may cause a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) difficulty in converging to the true Pareto-optimal front. Identification of such features helps us develop difficult test problems for multi-objective optimization. Multi-objective test problems are constructed from single-objective optimization problems, thereby allowing known difficult features of single-objective problems (such as multi-modality, isolation, or deception) to be directly transferred to the corresponding multi-objective problem. In addition, test problems having features specific to multiobjective optimization are also constructed. More importantly, these difficult test problems will enable researchers to test their algorithms for specific aspects of multi-objective optimization. Keywords Genetic algorithms, multi-objective optimization, niching, pareto-optimality, problem difficulties, test problems. 1 Introduction After a decade since the pioneering wor...
Selection in Massively Parallel Genetic Algorithms
- PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC ALGORITHMS
, 1991
"... The availability of massively parallel computers makes it possible to apply genetic algorithms to large populations and very complex applications. Among these applications are studies of natural evolution in the emerging field of artificial life, which place special demands on the genetic algorit ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 121 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The availability of massively parallel computers makes it possible to apply genetic algorithms to large populations and very complex applications. Among these applications are studies of natural evolution in the emerging field of artificial life, which place special demands on the genetic algorithm. In this paper, we characterize the difference between panmictic and local selection/mating schemes in terms of diversity of alleles, diversity of genotypes, the inbreeding coefficient, and the speed and robustness of the genetic algorithm. Based on these metrics, local mating appears to not only be superior to panmictic for artificial evolutionary simulations, but also for more traditional applications of genetic algorithms.
A Sequential Niche Technique for Multimodal Function Optimization
- EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
, 1993
"... A technique is described which allows unimodal function optimization methods to be extended to efficiently locate all optima of multimodal problems. We describe an algorithm based on a traditional genetic algorithm (GA). This involves iterating the GA, but uses knowledge gained during one iteration ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 107 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A technique is described which allows unimodal function optimization methods to be extended to efficiently locate all optima of multimodal problems. We describe an algorithm based on a traditional genetic algorithm (GA). This involves iterating the GA, but uses knowledge gained during one iteration to avoid re-searching, on subsequent iterations, regions of problem space where solutions have already been found. This is achieved by applying a fitness derating function to the raw fitness function, so that fitness values are depressed in the regions of the problem space where solutions have already been found. Consequently, the likelihood of discovering a new solution on each iteration is dramatically increased. The technique may be used with various styles of GA, or with other optimization methods, such as simulated annealing. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated on a number of multimodal test functions. The technique is at least as fast as fitness sharing methods. It provi...
Massive Multimodality, Deception, and Genetic Algorithms
, 1992
"... This paper considers the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) for the solution of problems that are both average-sense misleading (deceptive) and massively multimodal. An archetypical multimodal-deceptive problem, here called a bipolar deceptive problem, is defined and two generalized constructions of su ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 101 (24 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper considers the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) for the solution of problems that are both average-sense misleading (deceptive) and massively multimodal. An archetypical multimodal-deceptive problem, here called a bipolar deceptive problem, is defined and two generalized constructions of such problems are reviewed, one using reflected trap functions and one using low-order Walsh coefficients; sufficient conditions for bipolar deception are also reviewed. The Walsh construction is then used to form a 30-bit, order-six bipolar-deceptive function by concatenating five, six-bit bipolar functions. This test function, with over five million local optima and 32 global optima, poses a difficult challenge to simple and niched GAs alike. Nonetheless, simulations show that a simple GA can reliably find one of the 32 global optima if appropriate signal-to-noise-ratio population sizing is adopted. Simulations also demonstrate that a niched GA can reliably and simultaneously find all 32 global solutions if the population is roughly sized for the expected niche distribution and if the function is appropriately scaled to emphasize global solutions at the expense of suboptimal ones. These results immediately recommend the application of niched GAs using appropriate population sizing and scaling. They also suggest a number of avenues for generalizing the notion of deception.
An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
, 1998
"... Many real-world search and optimization problems involve inequality and/or equality constraints and are thus posed as constrained optimization problems. In trying to solve constrained optimization problems using genetic algorithms (GAs) or classical optimization methods, penalty function methods hav ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 87 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Many real-world search and optimization problems involve inequality and/or equality constraints and are thus posed as constrained optimization problems. In trying to solve constrained optimization problems using genetic algorithms (GAs) or classical optimization methods, penalty function methods have been the most popular approach, because of their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, since the penalty function approach is generic and applicable to any type of constraint (linear or nonlinear), their performance is not always satisfactory. Thus, researchers have developed sophisticated penalty functions specific to the problem at hand and the search algorithm used for optimization. However, the most difficult aspect of the penalty function approach is to find appropriate penalty parameters needed to guide the search towards the constrained optimum. In this paper, GA's population-based approach and ability to make pair-wise comparison in tournament selection operator are explo...
Searching for Diverse, Cooperative Populations with Genetic Algorithms
- EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
, 1993
"... In typical applications, genetic algorithms (GAs) process populations of potential problem solutions to evolve a single population member that specifies an "optimized" solution. The majority of GA analysis has focused on these optimization applications. In other applications (notably learning cla ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 83 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In typical applications, genetic algorithms (GAs) process populations of potential problem solutions to evolve a single population member that specifies an "optimized" solution. The majority of GA analysis has focused on these optimization applications. In other applications (notably learning classifier systems and certain connectionist learning systems), a GA searches for a population of cooperative structures that jointly perform a computational task. This paper presents an analysis of this type of GA problem. The analysis considers a simplified genetics-based machine learning system: a model of an immune system. In this model, a GA must discover a set of pattern-matching antibodies that effectively match a set of antigen patterns. Analysis shows how a GA can automatically evolve and sustain a diverse, cooperative population. The cooperation emerges as a natural part of the antigen-antibody matching procedure. This emergent effect is shown to be similar to fitness sharing, ...
A Coevolutionary Approach to Learning Sequential Decision Rules
- Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
, 1995
"... We present a coevolutionary approach to learning sequential decision rules which appears to have a number of advantages over non-coevolutionary approaches. The coevolutionary approach encourages the formation of stable niches representing simpler subbehaviors. The evolutionary direction of each subb ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 77 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a coevolutionary approach to learning sequential decision rules which appears to have a number of advantages over non-coevolutionary approaches. The coevolutionary approach encourages the formation of stable niches representing simpler subbehaviors. The evolutionary direction of each subbehavior can be controlled independently, providing an alternative to evolving complex behavior using intermediate training steps. Results are presented showing a significant learning rate speedup over a noncoevolutionary approach in a simulated robot domain. In addition, the results suggest the coevolutionary approach may lead to emergent problem decompositions. 1 Introduction For both natural and artificial organisms the ability to learn complex behavior is desirable, but difficult to achieve. Techniques such as "shaping" are frequently used to construct complex behaviors in stages by breaking them down into simpler behaviors which can be learned more easily, and then using these simpler b...

