Results 1 -
3 of
3
A Phase Transition in Random Coin Tossing
- Ann. Probab
, 2000
"... this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide definitions and introduce notation. In Section 3, we prove a useful general zero-one law, to show that singularity and absolute continuity of the measures are the only possibilities. In Section 4, Theorem 1.1(i) is proved, while Theorem 1. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide definitions and introduce notation. In Section 3, we prove a useful general zero-one law, to show that singularity and absolute continuity of the measures are the only possibilities. In Section 4, Theorem 1.1(i) is proved, while Theorem 1.1(ii) is established in Section 5. We prove a more general version of Theorem 1.2 in Section 6. In Section 7, we prove a criterion for absolute continuity, which is used to prove Theorem 1.4 in Section 8 and Theorem 1.3 in Section 9. A connection to long-range percolation and some unsolved problems are described in Section 10. 2. Definitions. Let # = {0, 1} # be the space of binary sequences. Denote by # n the n th coordinate projection from #. Endow # with the #-field H generated by {# n } n#0 and let P be a renewal measure on (#, H), that is, a measure obeying P[# 0 = 1, # n(1) = 1, . . . , # n(m) = 1] = m # i=1 u n(i)-n(i-1) , (2.1) where u n def = P[# n = 1]. We let {T k } # k=1 denote the inter-arrival times of the renewal process: If S n = inf{m > S n-1 : #m = 1} is the time of the n th renewal, then T n = S n - S n-1 . The condition (2.1) implies that T 1 , T 2 , . . . is an i.i.d. sequence. We will use f n to denote P[T 1 = n]. In the introduction we defined u n as the probability for a Markov chain # to return to its initial state at time n. If # n = 1 {#n=o} , then the Markov property guarantees that (2.1) is satisfied. Conversely, any renewal process # can be realized as the indicator of return times of a Markov chain to its initial state. (Take, for example, the chain whose value at epoch n is the time until the next renewal, and Random Coin Tossing 7 consider returns to 0.) Thus we can move freely between these points of view. For...
STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR SUMS OF PRODUCTS
- THE ANNALS OF PROBABILITY
, 1996
"... Let X � Xn, n ≥ 1, be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong law of large numbers n −k/p Xi1Xi2 � � � Xik → 0 a.s. 1≤i1
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Let X � Xn, n ≥ 1, be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong law of large numbers n −k/p Xi1Xi2 � � � Xik → 0 a.s. 1≤i1<i2<···<ik≤n for k = 2 without regularity conditions on X, for k ≥ 3 in three cases: (i) symmetric X, (ii) P�X ≥ 0 � = 1 and (iii) regularly varying P��X �> x� as x → ∞, without further conditions, and for general X and k under a condition on the growth of the truncated mean of X. Randomized, centered, squared and decoupled strong laws and general normalizing sequences are also considered.
THE EFFECT OF TRIMMING ON THE STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS
, 1993
"... 'Trimmed ' sample sums may be defined for r = 1, 2,..., by and We _c _v(l)_y(2) _ _yW where Sn = X1 + X-, +... + Xn is the sum of independent and identically distributed random variables Xit M^s=... 25 M 1 " ' denote Xx,..., Xn arranged in decreasing order, and X ^ is the observation with i ^ x ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
'Trimmed ' sample sums may be defined for r = 1, 2,..., by and We _c _v(l)_y(2) _ _yW where Sn = X1 + X-, +... + Xn is the sum of independent and identically distributed random variables Xit M^s=... 25 M 1 " ' denote Xx,..., Xn arranged in decreasing order, and X ^ is the observation with i ^ x n g g ^ the yth largest modulus. We investigate the effects of these kinds of trimming on various forms of convergence and divergence of the sample sum. In particular, we provide integral tests for <- r) Sn/n-*±», and analytical criteria for almost sure relative stability when the number of points trimmed, r, is fixed, but n—> °°. Some surprising results occur. For example, when r = 0,1, 2,..., {r) Sn may be almost surely negatively relatively stable ( (r) 5n/5n — *-1 a.s. as n — * «> for some non-stochastic sequence Bn f o°) only if- « <EX ^ =£(), and a striking corollary of this is an example of a random walk Sn which is recurrent (even has mean 0), but for which (r) 5n and (r) 5n are transient when r s * 1. 1.

