The change blindness phenomenon suggests that visual representations retained across saccades are very limited. In this paper we sought to specify the kind of information that is in fact retained. We investigated targeting performance for saccadic eye movements, since one need for visual representations across eye and body positions may be to guide coordinated movements. We examined saccades in the context of an ongoing sensory motor task in order to make stronger generalizations about natural visual functioning and deployment of attention. Human subjects copied random patterns of coloured blocks on a computer display. Their eye movement pattern was consistent from block to block, including a precise saccade to a previously-placed, neighbouring block during each additional block placement.This natural, consistent eye movement allowed the previously-placed, neighbouring block to serve as an implicit target without instructions to the subject. On random trials, we removed the target object from the display during a preceding saccade, so that observers were required to make the targeting saccade without a currently visible target. Targeting performance was excellent, and appeared to be influenced by spatial information that was not visible during the preceding fixation. Subjects were generally unaware of the disappearance and reappearance of the target. We conclude that spatial information about visual targets is retained across eye movements and used to guide subsequent movements.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : xiii I Introduction : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 A. Spatial representations and sensori-motor coordination : : : : : : : : : 1 B. The posterior parietal cortex : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 2 C. Neural code for spatial representations : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 1. Dynamic remapping : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 2. Gain modulation : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 6 3. The Zipser and Andersen Network : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 6 D. Parallel vectorial representations : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 9 E. Thesis Outline : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 10 1. Hierarchy in spatial representations : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 10 2. A basis function approach for spatial representation : : : : : : : : 11 II Egocentric spatial representation in early vision : :...

Contents 1. The puzzle of seeing......................................1-2 1.1 Why do things look the way they do? ..................................................................................1-2 1.2 What is seeing? .................................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Does vision create a "picture" in the head?...........................................................................1-4 1.3.1 The richness of visual appearances and the poverty of visual information: Reconciling the difference ...........................................................................................1-4 1.3.2 Some reasons for thinking there may be an inner display................................................1-6 1.4 Some problems with the Internal Display Assumption: Part I: What's in the display and how does it get there?....................................................................1-10 1.4.1 How is

www.elsevier.com/locate/visres

Linking visual response properties in the superior colliculus to saccade behavior