Results 1  10
of
360
A logic programming language with lambdaabstraction, function variables, and simple unification
 Extensions of Logic Programming. Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
, 1990
"... A meta programming language must be able to represent and manipulate such syntactic structures as programs, formulas, types, and proofs. A common characteristic of all these structures is that they involve notions of abstractions, scope, bound and free variables, substitution instances, and equality ..."
Abstract

Cited by 314 (27 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
A meta programming language must be able to represent and manipulate such syntactic structures as programs, formulas, types, and proofs. A common characteristic of all these structures is that they involve notions of abstractions, scope, bound and free variables, substitution instances, and equality up to alphabetic changes of bound variables.
A new approach to abstract syntax with variable binding
 Formal Aspects of Computing
, 2002
"... Abstract. The permutation model of set theory with atoms (FMsets), devised by Fraenkel and Mostowski in the 1930s, supports notions of ‘nameabstraction ’ and ‘fresh name ’ that provide a new way to represent, compute with, and reason about the syntax of formal systems involving variablebinding op ..."
Abstract

Cited by 287 (63 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. The permutation model of set theory with atoms (FMsets), devised by Fraenkel and Mostowski in the 1930s, supports notions of ‘nameabstraction ’ and ‘fresh name ’ that provide a new way to represent, compute with, and reason about the syntax of formal systems involving variablebinding operations. Inductively defined FMsets involving the nameabstraction set former (together with Cartesian product and disjoint union) can correctly encode syntax modulo renaming of bound variables. In this way, the standard theory of algebraic data types can be extended to encompass signatures involving binding operators. In particular, there is an associated notion of structural recursion for defining syntaxmanipulating functions (such as capture avoiding substitution, set of free variables, etc.) and a notion of proof by structural induction, both of which remain pleasingly close to informal practice in computer science. 1.
Typing and Subtyping for Mobile Processes
 MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1996
"... The picalculus is a process algebra that supports process mobility by focusing on the communication of channels. Milner's ..."
Abstract

Cited by 276 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The picalculus is a process algebra that supports process mobility by focusing on the communication of channels. Milner's
Standard ML of New Jersey
 Third Int'l Symp. on Prog. Lang. Implementation and Logic Programming
, 1991
"... The Standard ML of New Jersey compiler has been under development for five years now. We have developed a robust and complete environment for Standard ML that supports the implementation of large software systems and generates efficient code. The compiler has also served as a laboratory for developi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 207 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The Standard ML of New Jersey compiler has been under development for five years now. We have developed a robust and complete environment for Standard ML that supports the implementation of large software systems and generates efficient code. The compiler has also served as a laboratory for developing novel implementation techniques for a sophisticated type and module system, continuation based code generation, efficient pattern matching, and concurrent programming features.
A Logic of Argumentation for Reasoning under Uncertainty.
 Computational Intelligence
, 1995
"... We present the syntax and proof theory of a logic of argumentation, LA. We also outline the development of a category theoretic semantics for LA. LA is the core of a proof theoretic model for reasoning under uncertainty. In this logic, propositions are labelled with a representation of the arguments ..."
Abstract

Cited by 145 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present the syntax and proof theory of a logic of argumentation, LA. We also outline the development of a category theoretic semantics for LA. LA is the core of a proof theoretic model for reasoning under uncertainty. In this logic, propositions are labelled with a representation of the arguments which support their validity. Arguments may then be aggregated to collect more information about the potential validity of the propositions of interest. We make the notion of aggregation primitive to the logic, and then define strength mappings from sets of arguments to one of a number of possible dictionaries. This provides a uniform framework which incorporates a number of numerical and symbolic techniques for assigning subjective confidences to propositions on the basis of their supporting arguments. These aggregation techniques are also described, with examples. Key words: Uncertain reasoning, epistemic probability, argumentation, nonclassical logics, nonmonotonic reasoning 1. Introd...
Confluence properties of Weak and Strong Calculi of Explicit Substitutions
 JOURNAL OF THE ACM
, 1996
"... Categorical combinators [12, 21, 43] and more recently oecalculus [1, 23], have been introduced to provide an explicit treatment of substitutions in the calculus. We reintroduce here the ingredients of these calculi in a selfcontained and stepwise way, with a special emphasis on confluence prope ..."
Abstract

Cited by 129 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Categorical combinators [12, 21, 43] and more recently oecalculus [1, 23], have been introduced to provide an explicit treatment of substitutions in the calculus. We reintroduce here the ingredients of these calculi in a selfcontained and stepwise way, with a special emphasis on confluence properties. The main new results of the paper w.r.t. [12, 21, 1, 23] are the following: 1. We present a confluent weak calculus of substitutions, where no variable clashes can be feared. 2. We solve a conjecture raised in [1]: oecalculus is not confluent (it is confluent on ground terms only). This unfortunate result is "repaired" by presenting a confluent version of oecalculus, named the Envcalculus in [23], called here the confluent oecalculus.
Higherorder Unification via Explicit Substitutions (Extended Abstract)
 Proceedings of LICS'95
, 1995
"... Higherorder unification is equational unification for βηconversion. But it is not firstorder equational unification, as substitution has to avoid capture. In this paper higherorder unification is reduced to firstorder equational unification in a suitable theory: the &lambda ..."
Abstract

Cited by 104 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Higherorder unification is equational unification for &beta;&eta;conversion. But it is not firstorder equational unification, as substitution has to avoid capture. In this paper higherorder unification is reduced to firstorder equational unification in a suitable theory: the &lambda;&sigma;calculus of explicit substitutions.
A lambdacalculus à la de Bruijn with explicit substitutions
, 1995
"... The aim of this paper is to present the scalculus which is a very simple calculus with explicit substitutions and to prove its confluence on closed terms and the preservation of strong normalisation of terms. We shall prove strong normalisation of the corresponding calculus of substitution by tra ..."
Abstract

Cited by 89 (31 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The aim of this paper is to present the scalculus which is a very simple calculus with explicit substitutions and to prove its confluence on closed terms and the preservation of strong normalisation of terms. We shall prove strong normalisation of the corresponding calculus of substitution by translating it into the oecalculus [ACCL91], and therefore the relation between both calculi will be made explicit. The confluence of the scalculus is obtained by the "interpretation method" ([Har89], [CHL92]). The proof of the preservation of normalisation follows the lines of an analogous result for the AEcalculus (cf. [BBLRD95]). The relation between s and AE is also studied.
De Bruijn notation as a nested datatype
 Journal of Functional Programming
, 1999
"... “I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data.” ..."
Abstract

Cited by 78 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
“I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data.”