This paper explores a new point in the design space of formal reasoning systems - part programming language, part logical framework. The system is built on a programming language where the user expresses equality constraints between types and the type checker then enforces these constraints. This simple extension to the type system allows the programmer to describe properties of his program in the types of witness objects which can be thought of as concrete evidence that the program has the property desired. These techniques and two other rich typing mechanisms, rank-N polymorphism and extensible kinds, create a powerful new programming idiom for writing programs whose types enforce semantic properties. A language with these features is both a practical programming language and a logic. This marriage between two previously separate entities increases the probability that users will apply formal methods to their programming designs. This kind of synthesis creates the foundations for the languages of the future.

Abstract not found

MLF is a type system that extends a functional language with impredicative rank-n polymorphism. Type inference remains possible and only in some clearly defined situations, a local type annotation is required. Qualified types are a general concept that can accommodate a wide range of type systems extension, for example, type classes in Haskell. We show how the theory of qualified types can be used seamlessly with the higher-ranked impredicative polymorphism of MLF, and give a solution to the non-trivial problem of evidence translation in the presence of impredicative datatypes. 1.

HMF is a conservative extension of Hindley-Milner type inference with first-class polymorphism. In contrast to other proposals, HML uses regular System F types and has a simple type inference algorithm that is just a small extension of the usual Damas-Milner algorithm W. Given the relative simplicity and expressive power, we feel that HMF can be an attractive type system in practice. There is a reference implementation of the type system available online together with

Advice is a mechanism, widely used in aspect-oriented languages, that allows one program component to augment or modify the behavior of other components. When advice and other components are composed together they become tightly coupled, sharing both control and data flows. However this creates important problems: modular reasoning about a component becomes very difficult; and two tightly coupled components may interfere with each other’s control and data flows. This paper presents EffectiveAdvice, a disciplined model of advice, inspired by Aldrich’s Open Modules, that has full support for effects. With EffectiveAdvice, equivalence of advice, as well as base components, can be checked by equational reasoning. The paper describes EffectiveAdvice as a Haskell library in which advice is modeled by mixin inheritance and effects are modeled by monads. Interference patterns previously identified in the literature are expressed as combinators. Parametricity, together with the combinators, is used to prove two harmless advice theorems. The result is an effective semantic model of advice that supports effects, and allows these effects to be separated with strong non-interference guarantees, or merged as needed.

Monads are widely used in Haskell for modeling computational effects, but defining monads remains a daunting challenge. Since every part of a monad’s definition depends on its computational effects, programmers cannot leverage the common behavior of all monads easily and thus must build from scratch each monad that models a new computational effect. I propose the Unimo framework which allows programmers to define monads and monad transformers in a modular manner. Unimo contains a heavily parameterized observer function which enforces the monad laws, and programmers define a monad by invoking the observer function with arguments that specify the computational effects of the monad. Since Unimo provides the common behavior of all monads in a reusable form, programmers no longer need to rebuild the semantic boilerplate for each monad and can instead focus on the more interesting and rewarding task of modeling the desired computational effects.

Records provide a safe and flexible way to construct data structures. We describe a natural approach to typing polymorphic and extensible records that is simple, easy to use in practice, and straightforward to implement. A novel aspect of this work is that records can contain duplicate labels, effectively introducing a form of scoping over the labels. Furthermore, it is a fully orthogonal extension to existing type systems and programming languages. In particular, we show how it can be used conveniently with standard Hindley-Milner, qualified types, and MLF. 1

In almost all languages all arguments to functions are to be given explicitly. The Haskell class system however is an exception: functions can have class predicates as part of their type signature, and dictionaries are implicitly constructed and implicitly passed for such predicates, thus relieving the programmer from a lot of clerical work and removing clutter from the program text. Unfortunately Haskell maintains a very strict boundary between the implicit and the explicit world; if the implicit mechanisms fail to construct the hidden dictionaries there is no way the programmer can provide help, nor is he able to override the choices made by the implicit mechanisms. In this paper we describe, in the context of Haskell, a mechanism that allows the programmer to explicitly construct implicit arguments. This extension blends well with existing resolution mechanisms, since it only overrides the default behavior. We include a description of the use of partial type signatures, which liberates the programmer from having to choose between specifying a complete type signature or no type signature at all. Finally we show how the system can easily be extended to deal with higher-order predicates, thus enabling the elegant formulation of some forms of generic programming.

Abstract not found

Abstract. We present a uniqueness type system that is simpler than both Clean’s uniqueness system and a system we proposed previously. The new type system is straightforward to implement and add to existing compilers, and can easily be extended with advanced features such as higher rank types and impredicativity. We describe our implementation in Morrow, an experimental functional language with both these features. Finally, we prove soundness of the core type system with respect to the call-by-need lambda calculus. 1 Introduction to Uniqueness Typing An important property of pure functional programming languages is referential transparency: the same expression used twice must have the same value twice. This makes equational reasoning possible and aids program analysis, but most languages do not have this property. For example, in the following C fragment,