Results 1  10
of
1,088
Partial Functions
"... this article we prove some auxiliary theorems and schemes related to the articles: [1] and [2]. MML Identifier: PARTFUN1. WWW: http://mizar.org/JFM/Vol1/partfun1.html The articles [4], [6], [3], [5], [7], [8], and [1] provide the notation and terminology for this paper. We adopt the following rules ..."
Abstract

Cited by 492 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
this article we prove some auxiliary theorems and schemes related to the articles: [1] and [2]. MML Identifier: PARTFUN1. WWW: http://mizar.org/JFM/Vol1/partfun1.html The articles [4], [6], [3], [5], [7], [8], and [1] provide the notation and terminology for this paper. We adopt the following rules: x, y, y 1 , y 2 , z, z 1 , z 2 denote sets, P , Q, X , X 0 , X 1 , X 2 , Y , Y 0 , Y 1 , Y 2 , V , Z denote sets, and C, D denote non empty sets. We now state three propositions: (1) If P ` [: X 1
Binary operations
 Journal of Formalized Mathematics
, 1989
"... Summary. In this paper we define binary and unary operations on domains. We also define the following predicates concerning the operations:... is commutative,... is associative,... is the unity of..., and... is distributive wrt.... A number of schemes useful in justifying the existence of the operat ..."
Abstract

Cited by 363 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Summary. In this paper we define binary and unary operations on domains. We also define the following predicates concerning the operations:... is commutative,... is associative,... is the unity of..., and... is distributive wrt.... A number of schemes useful in justifying the existence of the operations are proved. MML Identifier:BINOP_1. WWW:http://mizar.org/JFM/Vol1/binop_1.html The articles [4], [3], [5], [6], [1], and [2] provide the notation and terminology for this paper. Let f be a function and let a, b be sets. The functor f(a, b) yielding a set is defined by: (Def. 1) f(a, b) = f(〈a, b〉). In the sequel A is a set. Let A, B be non empty sets, let C be a set, let f be a function from [:A, B:] into C, let a be an element of A, and let b be an element of B. Then f(a, b) is an element of C. The following proposition is true (2) 1 Let A, B, C be non empty sets and f1, f2 be functions from [:A, B:] into C. Suppose that for every element a of A and for every element b of B holds f1(a, b) = f2(a, b). Then f1 = f2. Let A be a set. A unary operation on A is a function from A into A. A binary operation on A is a
Finite Sequences and Tuples of Elements of a Nonempty Sets
, 1990
"... this article is the definition of tuples. The element of a set of all sequences of the length n of D is called a tuple of a nonempty set D and it is denoted by element of D ..."
Abstract

Cited by 332 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
this article is the definition of tuples. The element of a set of all sequences of the length n of D is called a tuple of a nonempty set D and it is denoted by element of D
Binary operations applied to functions
 Journal of Formalized Mathematics
, 1989
"... Summary. In the article we introduce functors yielding to a binary operation its composition with an arbitrary functions on its left side, its right side or both. We prove theorems describing the basic properties of these functors. We introduce also constant functions and converse of a function. The ..."
Abstract

Cited by 299 (43 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Summary. In the article we introduce functors yielding to a binary operation its composition with an arbitrary functions on its left side, its right side or both. We prove theorems describing the basic properties of these functors. We introduce also constant functions and converse of a function. The recent concept is defined for an arbitrary function, however is meaningful in the case of functions which range is a subset of a Cartesian product of two sets. Then the converse of a function has the same domain as the function itself and assigns to an element of the domain the mirror image of the ordered pair assigned by the function. In the case of functions defined on a nonempty set we redefine the above mentioned functors and prove simplified versions of theorems proved in the general case. We prove also theorems stating relationships between introduced concepts and such properties of binary operations as commutativity or associativity.
Basis of Real Linear Space
, 1990
"... this paper. For simplicity, we follow the rules: x is a set, a, b are real numbers, V is a real linear space, W 1 , W 2 , W 3 are subspaces of V , v, v 1 , v 2 are vectors of V , A, B are subsets of the carrier of V , L, L 1 , L 2 are linear combinations of V , l is a linear combination of A, F , G ..."
Abstract

Cited by 285 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
this paper. For simplicity, we follow the rules: x is a set, a, b are real numbers, V is a real linear space, W 1 , W 2 , W 3 are subspaces of V , v, v 1 , v 2 are vectors of V , A, B are subsets of the carrier of V , L, L 1 , L 2 are linear combinations of V , l is a linear combination of A, F , G
Pigeon hole principle
 Journal of Formalized Mathematics
, 1990
"... Summary. We introduce the notion of a predicate that states that a function is onetoone at a given element of its domain (i.e. counterimage of image of the element is equal to its singleton). We also introduce some rather technical functors concerning finite sequences: the lowest index of the given ..."
Abstract

Cited by 261 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Summary. We introduce the notion of a predicate that states that a function is onetoone at a given element of its domain (i.e. counterimage of image of the element is equal to its singleton). We also introduce some rather technical functors concerning finite sequences: the lowest index of the given element of the range of the finite sequence, the substring preceding (and succeeding) the first occurrence of given element of the range. At the end of the article we prove the pigeon hole principle.
The Modification of a Function by a Function and the Iteration of the Composition of a Function
, 1990
"... ..."
The Reflection Theorem
 Journal of Formalized Mathematics
, 1990
"... this paper (and in another Mizar articles) we work in TarskiGrothendieck (TG) theory (see [17]) which ensures the existence of sets that have properties like universal class (i.e. this theory is stronger than MK). The sets are introduced in [15] and some concepts of MK are modeled. The concepts are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 249 (51 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper (and in another Mizar articles) we work in TarskiGrothendieck (TG) theory (see [17]) which ensures the existence of sets that have properties like universal class (i.e. this theory is stronger than MK). The sets are introduced in [15] and some concepts of MK are modeled. The concepts are: the class On of all ordinal numbers belonging to the universe, subclasses, transfinite sequences of nonempty elements of universe, etc. The reflection theorem states that if A ¸ is an increasing and continuous transfinite sequence of nonempty sets and class A =
The Euclidean space
 Journal of Formalized Mathematics
, 1991
"... Summary. The article contains definition of a compact space and some theorems about compact spaces. The notions of a cover of a set and a centered family are defined in the article to be used in these theorems. A set is compact in the topological space if and only if every open cover of the set has ..."
Abstract

Cited by 174 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Summary. The article contains definition of a compact space and some theorems about compact spaces. The notions of a cover of a set and a centered family are defined in the article to be used in these theorems. A set is compact in the topological space if and only if every open cover of the set has a finite subcover. This definition is equivalent, what has been shown next, to the following definition: a set is compact if and only if a subspace generated by that set is compact. Some theorems about mappings and homeomorphisms of compact spaces have been also proved. The following schemes used in proofs of theorems have been proved in the article: FuncExChoice – the scheme of choice of a function, BiFuncEx – the scheme of parallel choice of two functions and the theorem about choice of a finite counter image of a finite image.
Partially Ordered Sets
, 2000
"... this article we define the choice function of a nonempty set family that does not contain ; as introduced in [6, pages 8889]. We define order of a set as a relation being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive in the set, partially ordered set as structure nonempty set and order of the set, cha ..."
Abstract

Cited by 155 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
this article we define the choice function of a nonempty set family that does not contain ; as introduced in [6, pages 8889]. We define order of a set as a relation being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive in the set, partially ordered set as structure nonempty set and order of the set, chains, lower and upper cone of a subset, initial segments of element and subset of partially ordered set. Some theorems that belong rather to [5] or [14] are proved. MML Identifier: ORDERS1.