Results 1  10
of
241
A Correspondence Theory for Terminological Logics: Preliminary Report
 In Proc. of IJCAI91
, 1991
"... We show that the terminological logic ALC comprising Boolean operations on concepts and value restrictions is a notational variant of the propositional modal logic K (m) . To demonstrate the utility of the correspondence, we give two of its immediate byproducts. Namely, we axiomatize ALC and give a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 307 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that the terminological logic ALC comprising Boolean operations on concepts and value restrictions is a notational variant of the propositional modal logic K (m) . To demonstrate the utility of the correspondence, we give two of its immediate byproducts. Namely, we axiomatize ALC and give a simple proof that subsumption in ALC is PSPACEcomplete, replacing the original sixpage one. Furthermore, we consider an extension of ALC additionally containing both the identity role and the composition, union, transitivereflexive closure, range restriction, and inverse of roles. It turns out that this language, called T SL, is a notational variant of the propositional dynamic logic converse PDL. Using this correspondence, we prove that it suffices to consider finite T SLmodels, show that T SLsubsumption is decidable, and obtain an axiomatization of T SL. By discovering that features correspond to deterministic programs in dynamic logic, we show that adding them to T SL preserves...
The Complexity of Concept Languages
, 1995
"... The basic feature of Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems is to represent knowledge by means of taxonomies, here called terminologies, and to provide a specialized reasoning engine to do inferences on these structures. The taxonomy is built through a representation language called concept ..."
Abstract

Cited by 242 (35 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The basic feature of Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems is to represent knowledge by means of taxonomies, here called terminologies, and to provide a specialized reasoning engine to do inferences on these structures. The taxonomy is built through a representation language called concept language (or description logic), which is given welldefined settheoretic semantics. The efficiency of reasoning has often been advocated as a primary motivation for the use of such systems. Deduction methods and computational properties of reasoning problems in concept languages are the subject of this paper. The main contributions of the paper are: (1) a complexity analysis of concept satisfiability and subsumption for a wide class of concept languages; (2) the algorithms for these inferences that comply with the worstcase complexity of the reasoning task they perform.
A Modal Logic for Coalitional Power in Games
, 2002
"... We present a modal logic for reasoning about what groups of agents can bring about by collective action. Given a set of states, we introduce game frames which associate with every state a strategic game among the agents. Game frames are essentially extensive games of perfect information with simulta ..."
Abstract

Cited by 196 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a modal logic for reasoning about what groups of agents can bring about by collective action. Given a set of states, we introduce game frames which associate with every state a strategic game among the agents. Game frames are essentially extensive games of perfect information with simultaneous actions, where every action profile is associated with a new state, the outcome of the game. A coalition of players is effective for a set of states # in a game if the coalition can guarantee the outcome of the game to lie in # . We propose a modal logic (Coalition Logic) to formalize reasoning about effectivity in game frames, where #### expresses that coalition # is effective for #. An axiomatization is presented and completeness proved. Coalition Logic provides a unifying gametheoretic view of modal logic: Since nondeterministic processes and extensive games without parallel moves emerge as particular instances of game frames, normal and nonnormal modal logics correspond to 1 and 2player versions of Coalition Logic. The satisfiability problem for Coalition Logic is shown to be PSPACEcomplete.
On the Restraining Power of Guards
 Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1998
"... Guarded fragments of firstorder logic were recently introduced by Andr'eka, van Benthem and N'emeti; they consist of relational firstorder formulae whose quantifiers are appropriately relativized by atoms. These fragments are interesting because they extend in a natural way many proposit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 153 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Guarded fragments of firstorder logic were recently introduced by Andr'eka, van Benthem and N'emeti; they consist of relational firstorder formulae whose quantifiers are appropriately relativized by atoms. These fragments are interesting because they extend in a natural way many propositional modal logics, because they have useful modeltheoretic properties and especially because they are decidable classes that avoid the usual syntactic restrictions (on the arity of relation symbols, the quantifier pattern or the number of variables) of almost all other known decidable fragments of firstorder logic. Here, we investigate the computational complexity of these fragments. We prove that the satisfiability problems for the guarded fragment (GF) and the loosely guarded fragment (LGF) of firstorder logic are complete for deterministic double exponential time. For the subfragments that have only a bounded number of variables or only relation symbols of bounded arity, satisfiability is EXPTI...
Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning
 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
, 1988
"... Several new logics for belief and knowledge are introduced and studied, all of which have the property that agents are not logically omniscient. In particular, in these logics, the set of beliefs of an agent does not necessarily contain all valid formulas. Thus, these logics are more suitable than t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 147 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Several new logics for belief and knowledge are introduced and studied, all of which have the property that agents are not logically omniscient. In particular, in these logics, the set of beliefs of an agent does not necessarily contain all valid formulas. Thus, these logics are more suitable than traditional logics for modelling beliefs of humans (or machines) with limited reasoning capabilities. Our first logic is essentially an extension of Levesque's logic of implicit and explicit belief, where we extend to allow multiple agents and higherlevel belief (i.e., beliefs about beliefs). Our second logic deals explicitly with "awareness," where, roughly speaking, it is necessary to be aware of a concept before one can have beliefs about it. Our third logic gives a model of "local reasoning," where an agent is viewed as a "society of minds," each with its own cluster of beliefs, which may contradict each other.
Why is modal logic so robustly decidable?
 OF DIMACS SERIES IN DISCRETE MATHEMATICS AND THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
, 1996
"... ..."
Tractable Reasoning via Approximation
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1995
"... Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 116 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantically wellfounded logic for approximate reasoning, which is justifiable from the intuitive point of view, and to provide fast algorithms for dealing with it even when using expressive languages. We also want our logic to be useful to perform approximate reasoning in different contexts. We define a method for the approximation of decision reasoning problems based on multivalued logics. Our work expands and generalizes in several directions ideas presented by other researchers. The major features of our technique are: 1) approximate answers give semantically clear information about the problem at hand; 2) approximate answers are easier to compute than answers to the original problem; 3) approxim...
Hybrid Logics: Characterization, Interpolation and Complexity
 Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1999
"... Hybrid languages are expansions of propositional modal languages which can refer to (or even quantify over) worlds. The use of strong hybrid languages dates back to at least [Pri67], but recent work (for example [BS98, BT98a, BT99]) has focussed on a more constrained system called H(#; @). We sho ..."
Abstract

Cited by 109 (36 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Hybrid languages are expansions of propositional modal languages which can refer to (or even quantify over) worlds. The use of strong hybrid languages dates back to at least [Pri67], but recent work (for example [BS98, BT98a, BT99]) has focussed on a more constrained system called H(#; @). We show in detail that H(#; @) is modally natural. We begin by studying its expressivity, and provide model theoretic characterizations (via a restricted notion of EhrenfeuchtFrasse game, and an enriched notion of bisimulation) and a syntactic characterization (in terms of bounded formulas). The key result to emerge is that H(#; @) corresponds to the fragment of rstorder logic which is invariant for generated submodels. We then show that H(#; @) enjoys (strong) interpolation, provide counterexamples for its nite variable fragments, and show that weak interpolation holds for the sublanguage H(@). Finally, we provide complexity results for H(@) and other fragments and variants, and sh...
Integrating description logics and action formalisms: First results
 In Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI05
, 2005
"... ..."
A roadmap on complexity for hybrid logics
 Computer Science Logic, number 1683 in LNCS
, 1999
"... Abstract. Hybrid languages are extended modal languages which can refer to (or even quantify over) states. Such languages are better behaved proof theoretically than ordinary modal languages for they internalize the apparatus of labeled deduction. Moreover, they arise naturally in a variety of appli ..."
Abstract

Cited by 90 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Hybrid languages are extended modal languages which can refer to (or even quantify over) states. Such languages are better behaved proof theoretically than ordinary modal languages for they internalize the apparatus of labeled deduction. Moreover, they arise naturally in a variety of applications, including description logic and temporal reasoning. Thus it would be useful to have a map of their complexitytheoretic properties, and this paper provides one. Our work falls into two parts. We first examine the basic hybrid language and its multimodal and tense logical cousins. We show that the basic hybrid language (and indeed, multimodal hybrid languages) are no more complex than ordinary unimodal logic: all have pspacecomplete Ksatisfiability problems. We then show that adding even one nominal to tense logic raises complexity from pspace to exptime. In the second part we turn to stronger hybrid languages in which it is possible to bind nominals. We prove a general expressivity result showing that even the weak form of binding offered by the ↓ operator easily leads to undecidability.