this paper is built. First, although raw returns are clearly leptokurtic, returns standardized by realized volatilities are approximately Gaussian. Second, although the distributions of realized volatilities are clearly right-skewed, the distributions of the logarithms of realized volatilities are approximately Gaussian. Third, the long-run dynamics of realized logarithmic volatilities are well approximated by a fractionally-integrated long-memory process. Motivated by the three ABDL empirical regularities, we proceed to estimate and evaluate a multivariate model for the logarithmic realized volatilities: a fractionally-integrated Gaussian vector autoregression (VAR) . Importantly, our approach explicitly permits measurement errors in the realized volatilities. Comparing the resulting volatility forecasts to those obtained from currently popular daily volatility models and more complicated high-frequency models, we find that our simple Gaussian VAR forecasts generally produce superior forecasts. Furthermore, we show that, given the theoretically motivated and empirically plausible assumption of normally distributed returns conditional on the realized volatilities, the resulting lognormal-normal mixture forecast distribution provides conditionally well-calibrated density forecasts of returns, from which we obtain accurate estimates of conditional return quantiles. In the remainder of this paper, we proceed as follows. We begin in section 2 by formally developing the relevant quadratic variation theory within a standard frictionless arbitrage-free multivariate pricing environment. In section 3 we discuss the practical construction of realized volatilities from high-frequency foreign exchange returns. Next, in section 4 we summarize the salient distributional features of r...

Abstract not found

Abstract not found

Using high-frequency data on deutschemark and yen returns against the dollar, we construct model-free estimates of daily exchange rate volatility and correlation that cover an entire decade. Our estimates, termed realized volatilities and correlations, are not only model-free, but also approximately free of measurement error under general conditions, which we discuss in detail. Hence, for practical purposes, we may treat the exchange rate volatilities and correlations as observed rather than latent. We do so, and we characterize their joint distribution, both unconditionally and conditionally. Noteworthy results include a simple normality-inducing volatility transformation, high contemporaneous correlation across volatilities, high correlation between correlation and volatilities, pronounced and persistent dynamics in volatilities and correlations, evidence of long-memory dynamics in volatilities and correlations, and remarkably precise scaling laws under temporal aggregation.

This paper surveys the most important developments in multivariate ARCH-type modelling. It reviews the model specifications and inference methods, and identifies likely directions of future research.

Recent studies have suggested that stock markets' volatility has a type of long-range dependence that is not appropriately described by the usual Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic (GARCH) and Exponential GARCH (EGARCH) models. In this paper, different models for describing this long-range dependence are examined and the properties of a Long-Memory Stochastic Volatility (LMSV) model, constructed by incorporating an Autoregressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average (ARFIMA) process in a stochastic volatility scheme, are discussed. Strongly consistent estimators for the parameters of this LMSV model are obtained by maximizing the spectral likelihood. The distribution of the estimators is analyzed by means of a Monte Carlo study. The LMSV is applied to daily stock market returns providing an improved description of the volatility behavior. In order to assess the empirical relevance of this approach, tests for long-memory volatility are described and applied to an e...

By using intra-day returns to calculate a measure for the time-varying volatility, Andersen and Bollerslev (1998a) established that volatility models do provide good forecasts of the conditional variance. In this paper, we take the same approach and use intra-day estimated measures of volatility to compare volatility models. Our objective is to evaluate whether the evolution of volatility models has led to better forecasts of volatility when compared to the first “species” of volatility models. We make an out-of-sample comparison of 330 different volatility models using daily exchange rate data (DM/$) and IBM stock prices. Our analysis does not point to a single winner amongst the different volatility models, as it is different models that are best at forecasting the volatility of the two types of assets. Interestingly, the best models do not provide a significantly better forecast than the GARCH(1,1) model. This result is established by the tests for superior predictive ability of White (2000) and Hansen (2001). If an ARCH(1) model is selected as the benchmark, it is clearly outperformed. We thank Tim Bollerslev for providing us with the exchange rate data set, and Sivan Ritz for suggesting numerous clarifications. All errors remain our responsibility.

Abstract not found

A rapidly growing literature has documented important improvements in financial return volatility measurement and forecasting via use of realized variation measures constructed from high-frequency returns coupled with simple modeling procedures. Building on recent theoretical results in Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2004a, 2005) for related bi-power variation measures, the present paper provides a practical and robust framework for non-parametrically measuring the jump component in asset return volatility. In an application to the DM/ $ exchange rate, the S&P500 market index, and the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yield, we find that jumps are both highly prevalent and distinctly less persistent than the continuous sample path variation process. Moreover, many jumps appear directly associated with specific macroeconomic news announcements. Separating jump from non-jump movements in a simple but sophisticated volatility forecasting model, we find that almost all of the predictability in daily, weekly, and monthly return volatilities comes from the non-jump component. Our results thus set the stage for a number of interesting future econometric developments and important financial applications by separately modeling, forecasting, and pricing the continuous and jump components of the total return variation process.

Abstract not found