Results 1 - 10
of
22
Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering
- Machine Learning
, 1987
"... hill climbing Abstract. Conceptual clustering is an important way of summarizing and explaining data. However, the recent formulation of this paradigm has allowed little exploration of conceptual clustering as a means of improving performance. Furthermore, previous work in conceptual clustering has ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 569 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
hill climbing Abstract. Conceptual clustering is an important way of summarizing and explaining data. However, the recent formulation of this paradigm has allowed little exploration of conceptual clustering as a means of improving performance. Furthermore, previous work in conceptual clustering has not explicitly dealt with constraints imposed by real world environments. This article presents COBWEB, a conceptual clustering system that organizes data so as to maximize inference ability. Additionally, COBWEB is incremental and computationally economical, and thus can be flexibly applied in a variety of domains. 1.
The Utility of Knowledge in Inductive Learning
, 1992
"... In this paper, we demonstrate how different forms of background knowledge can be integrated with an inductive method for generating constant-free Horn clause rules. Furthermore, we evaluate, both theoretically and empirically, the effect that these types of knowledge have on the cost of learning a r ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 140 (21 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we demonstrate how different forms of background knowledge can be integrated with an inductive method for generating constant-free Horn clause rules. Furthermore, we evaluate, both theoretically and empirically, the effect that these types of knowledge have on the cost of learning a rule and on the accuracy of a learned rule. Moreover, we demonstrate that a hybrid explanation-based and inductive learning method can advantageously use an approximate domain theory, even when this theory is incorrect and incomplete. 1 Introduction Most existing systems that combine empirical and explanation-based learning severely restrict the complexity of the language for expressing the concept definition. For example, some systems require that the concept definition be expressed in terms of attribute-value pairs (Lebowitz, 1986; Danyluk, 1989). Others effectively restrict the concept definition language to that of propositional calculus, by only allowing unary predicates (Hirsh, 1989;...
The Inferential Theory Of Learning: Developing Foundations for . . .
, 1993
"... Thedevelopmentofmultistrategylearningsystemsrequiresaclearunderstandingoftherolesandthe applicabilityconditionsofdifferentlearningstrategies.Tothisend,thischapterintroducesthe InferentialTheoryofLearning thatprovidesaconceptualframeworkforexplaininglogicalcapabilities oflearningstrategies,i.e.,thei ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 61 (15 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Thedevelopmentofmultistrategylearningsystemsrequiresaclearunderstandingoftherolesandthe applicabilityconditionsofdifferentlearningstrategies.Tothisend,thischapterintroducesthe InferentialTheoryofLearning thatprovidesaconceptualframeworkforexplaininglogicalcapabilities oflearningstrategies,i.e.,their competence.Viewinglearningasaprocessofmodifyingthelearner's knowledgebyexploringthelearner'sexperience,thetheorypostulatesthatanysuchprocesscanbe describedasasearchina knowledgespace, which involvesthelearner'sexperience,piorknowledgeand the learninggoal .Thesearchoperatorsareinstantiationsof knowledgetransmutations, whichare genericpatternsofknowledgechange.Transmutationsmayemployanybasictypeofinference --- deduction,inductionoranalogy.Severalfundamentalknowledg etransmutationsaredescribedinanovel andgeneralway,suchasgeneralization,abstraction,explanationandsimilization,andtheircounterparts, specialization,concretion,predictionanddissimilization,respectively.Generalizationenlargesthe referenceset ofadescription(thesetofentitiesthatarebeingdescribed).Abstractionreducesthe amountofthedetailaboutthereferenceset.Explanationgeneratespremisesthatexplain(orimply)the givenpropertiesofthereferenceset.Similization transfersknowledgefromonereferencesettoasimilar referenceset.Usingconceptsofthetheory,a multistrategytask -adaptivelearning(MTL)methodology isoutlined,andillustratedbyanexample.MTLdynamicallyadaptsstrategiestothe learningtask , definedbytheinputinformation,learner'sbackgroundknowledge,andthelearninggoal. Thegoalof MTLresearchisto synergisticallyintegrateawiderangeofinferentiallearningstrategies,suchas empiricalgeneralization,constructiveinduction, deductivegeneralization,explanation,prediction, abstraction,andsimilization. Keywords: learningtheory,inferencetheory,multi...
Competition-Based Learning
, 1992
"... This paper summarizes recent research on competition-based learning procedures performed by the Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence at the Naval Research Laboratory. We have focused on a particularly interesting class of competition-based techniques called genetic algorithms. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 39 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper summarizes recent research on competition-based learning procedures performed by the Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence at the Naval Research Laboratory. We have focused on a particularly interesting class of competition-based techniques called genetic algorithms. Genetic algorithms are adaptive search algorithms based on principles derived from the mechanisms of biological evolution. Recent results on the analysis of the implicit parallelism of alternative selection algorithms are summarized, along with an analysis of alternative crossover operators. Applications of these results in practical learning systems for sequential decision problems and for concept classification are also presented. INTRODUCTION One approach to the design of more flexible computer systems is to extract heuristics from existing adaptive systems. We have focused on a class of learning systems that use competition-based procedures, called genetic algorithms (GAs). GAs are ba...
Toward a Unified Theory of Learning: Multistrategy Task-Adaptive Learning
- IN: READINGS IN KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION AND
, 1993
"... Any learning process can be viewed as a self-modification of the leaxnefs current knowledge tArough an. interaction with some information source. Such knowledge modification is guided by the learner's deshe to achieve a certain outcome, and can engage any kind of inference. The type of inference inv ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Any learning process can be viewed as a self-modification of the leaxnefs current knowledge tArough an. interaction with some information source. Such knowledge modification is guided by the learner's deshe to achieve a certain outcome, and can engage any kind of inference. The type of inference involved depends on he input information, the current (background) knowledge and the learneFs task ax hand. Based on such a view of learning, several fundamental concepts are analized and clarified, in paxticular, analytic and synthetic learning, derivm:ional and hypothetical explanation, constnictive induction, abduction, abstraction and deductive generalization. It is shown that inductive generalization and abduction can be viewed as two basic forms of general induction, and that abstraction and deductive generalization axe two related forms of constructive deduction. Using this conceptual framework, a methodology for multistrategy task-adaptive learning (MTL) is outlined, in which learning strategies axe combined dynamically, depending on the current learning situation. Speccally, an MTL learner anaLizes a "wiad" relationship among the input information, the background knowledge and the learning task, and on that basis determines which strategy, or. a combination thereof, is most appropriate at a given learning step. To implement the MTL methodology, a new knowledge representation is proposed, based on the parametric association rules (PARs). Basic ideas of MTL are illustrated by means of the well-known "cup" example, through which is shown how an MTL learner can employ, depending the above mad relationship, emprical learning, constructive inductive generalization, abduction, explanation-based learning and absuaction.
Constraints and preferences in inductive learning: An experimental study of human and machine performance
- Cognitive Science
, 1987
"... The paper examines constraints ond preferences employed by people in learning decision rules from preclossified examples. Results from four experiments with human subiects were onolyzed ond compared with ortificiol intelligence (Al) inductive learning programs. The results showed the people’s rule i ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 27 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The paper examines constraints ond preferences employed by people in learning decision rules from preclossified examples. Results from four experiments with human subiects were onolyzed ond compared with ortificiol intelligence (Al) inductive learning programs. The results showed the people’s rule inductions tended lo emphosize category validity (probability of some property, given o category) more than cue validity (probability that on entity is o member of o cote-gory given that it hos some property) to o greater extent than did the Al pro-groms. Although the relative proportions of different rule types (e.g., conjunctive vs. disjunctive) changed across experiments, o single process model provided o good account of the data from each study. These observations ore used to argue for describing constraints in terms of processes embodied in models rather than in terms of products or outputs. Thus Al induction programs become condidote psychological process models ond results from inductive learning experiments con suggest new algorithms. More generally, the results show that humon induc-tive generolizotions tend toword greater specificity than would be expected if conceptual simplicity were the key constraint on inductions. This bias toword specificity moy be due lo the fact that this criterion both maximizes inferences that moy be drown from category membership ond protects rule induction sys-tems from developing over-generolizotions.
Discovering Regularities from Knowledge Bases
- International Journal of Intelligent Systems
, 1992
"... Knowledge bases open new horizons for machine learning research. One challenge is to design learning programs to expand the knowledge base using the knowledge that is currently available. This paper addresses the problem of discovering regularities in large knowledge bases that contain many assertio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Knowledge bases open new horizons for machine learning research. One challenge is to design learning programs to expand the knowledge base using the knowledge that is currently available. This paper addresses the problem of discovering regularities in large knowledge bases that contain many assertions in different domains. The paper begins with a definition of regularities and gives the motivation for such a definition. It then outlines a framework that attempts to integrate induction with knowledge. Although the implementation of the framework currently uses only a statistical method for confirming hypotheses, its application to some real knowledge base has shown some encouraging and interesting results. 1 Introduction Discovering regularities from knowledge bases is an important problem for both Knowledge Engineering and Machine Learning. Since the task is aimed at generating new knowledge, its success will directly contribute to knowledge acquisition and the construction of large k...
A Method for Multistrategy Task-Adaptive Learning Based on Plausible Justifixations
- MACHINE LEARNING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP
, 1991
"... Multistrategy task-adaptive learning (MTL) comprises a class of methods in which the learner determines by itself which strategy or combination of strategies is most appropriate for a given learning task defined by the learner's goal, the leamer's background knowledge (BK) and the input to the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Multistrategy task-adaptive learning (MTL) comprises a class of methods in which the learner determines by itself which strategy or combination of strategies is most appropriate for a given learning task defined by the learner's goal, the leamer's background knowledge (BK) and the input to the learning process. The paper presents a MTL method which is based on building a plausible justification that the learner's input is a consequence of its BK. The method assumes a general learning goal of deriving any useful knowledge from a given input and integrates dynamically a whole range of learning sategies. It also behaves as a singlestrategy method when the relationship between the input and the BK satisfies the requirements of the single-strategy method, and the general learning goal of the MTL method is specialized to the goal of the single-strategy method.
Automated Learning of Load-Balancing Strategies For A Distributed Computer System
, 1992
"... (or derived) decision metrics are exemplified by MinLoad, which denotes the least among all the Load values. ###################################################################################### SENDER-SIDE RULES (s) Possible-destinations = { site: Load(site) - Reference(s) < d(s) } Destination = ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(or derived) decision metrics are exemplified by MinLoad, which denotes the least among all the Load values. ###################################################################################### SENDER-SIDE RULES (s) Possible-destinations = { site: Load(site) - Reference(s) < d(s) } Destination = Random(Possible-destinations) IF Load(s) - Reference(s) > q 1 (s) THEN Send RECEIVER-SIDE RULES (r) IF Load(r) < q 2 (r) THEN Receive Figure 3. The load-balancing policy considered in this thesis The sender-side rules are applied by the load-balancing software at the site of arrival (s) of a task. Reference can be either 0 or MinLoad; the other parameters --- d, q 1 , and q 2 --- take non-negative floating-point values. A remote destination (r) is chosen randomly from Destinations, a set of sites whose load index falls within a small neighborhood of Reference. If Destinations is the empty set, or if the rule for sending fails, then the task is executed locally at s, its site of arrival; ot...

