Results 1 - 10
of
104
Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
- BCP 26, RFC 2434
, 1998
"... This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 173 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check the "1id-abstracts.txt " listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu
A Survey of BGP Security Issues and Solutions
- AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
, 2004
"... The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the de facto interdomain routing protocol of the Internet. Although the performance of BGP has been historically acceptable, there are continuing concerns about its ability to meet the needs of the rapidly evolving Internet. A major limitation of BGP is its failu ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 69 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the de facto interdomain routing protocol of the Internet. Although the performance of BGP has been historically acceptable, there are continuing concerns about its ability to meet the needs of the rapidly evolving Internet. A major limitation of BGP is its failure to adequately address security. Recent outages and security analyses clearly indicate that the Internet routing infrastructure is highly vulnerable. Moreover, the design and ubiquity of BGP has frustrated past efforts at securing interdomain routing. This paper considers the vulnerabilities currently existing within interdomain routing and surveys works relating to BGP security. The limitations and advantages of proposed solutions are explored, and the systemic and operational implications of their designs considered. We note that no current solution has yet found an adequate balance between comprehensive security and deployment cost. This work calls not only for the application of ideas described within this paper, but also for further investigation into the problems and solutions of BGP security.
Internet Security Glossary, Version 2
- Work in Progress
, 2006
"... not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 29 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol", draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26 (work in progress
, 2013
"... draft-ietf-p2psip-base-01 ..."
Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
- Cruickshank, et al. Informational [Page 18] RFC 5458 Security Requirements for ULE
, 2008
"... This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this pro ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 15 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2008 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status", RFC 7001
, 2013
"... This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this pro ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 12 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency Call Marking and Mapping
, 2006
"... draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-02.txt ..."
Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2
- BCP 146, RFC 5406
, 2009
"... This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Definition of Events for Modem, Fax, and Text Telephony Signals", RFC 4734
, 2006
"... This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this pro ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards " (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice
