The purpose of this paper is to set up a theory of generalized operads and multicategories and to use it as a language in which to propose a definition of weak n-category. Included is a full explanation of why the proposed definition of n-category is a reasonable one, and of what happens when n <= 2. Generalized operads and multicategories play other parts in higher-dimensional algebra too, some of which are outlined here: for instance, they can be used to simplify the opetopic approach to n-categories expounded by Baez, Dolan and others, and are a natural language in which to discuss enrichment of categorical structures.

The purpose of this paper is to work out the categorical basis for the foundations of Conformal Field Theory. The definition of Conformal Field Theory was outlined in Segal [45] and recently given in [24] and [25]. Concepts of 2-category theory, such as versions of algebra, limit, colimit, and adjunction, are necessary for this

We present a definition of homotopy algebra for an operad, and explore its consequences. The paper should be accessible to topologists, category theorists, and anyone acquainted with operads. After a review of operads and monoidal categories, the definition of homotopy algebra is given. Specifically, suppose that M is a monoidal category in which it makes sense to talk about algebras for some operad P. Then our definition says what a homotopy P-algebra in M is, provided only that some of the morphisms in M have been marked out as ‘homotopy equivalences’. The bulk of the paper consists of examples of homotopy algebras. We show that any loop space is a homotopy monoid, and, in fact, that any n-fold loop space is an n-fold homotopy monoid in an appropriate sense. We try to compare weakened algebraic structures such as A∞-spaces, A∞-algebras and non-strict monoidal categories to our homotopy algebras, with varying degrees of success. We also prove results on ‘change of base’, e.g. that the classifying space of a homotopy monoidal category is a homotopy topological monoid. Finally, we

Abstract. Two constructions of paths in double categories are studied, providing algebraic versions of the homotopy groupoid of a space. Universal properties of these constructions are presented. The first is seen as the codomain of the universal oplax morphism of double categories and the second, which is a quotient of the first, gives the universal normal oplax morphism. Normality forces an equivalence relation on cells, a special case of which was seen before in the free adjoint construction. These constructions are the object part of 2-comonads which are shown to be oplax idempotent. The coalgebras for these comonads turn out to be Leinster’s fc-multicategories, with representable identities in the second case.

Abstract not found

Abstract. We present two generalizations of the Span construction. The first generalization

Abstract. Notions of generalized multicategory have been defined in numerous contexts throughout the literature, and include such diverse examples as symmetric multicategories, globular operads, Lawvere theories, and topological spaces. In each case, generalized multicategories are defined as the “lax algebras ” or “Kleisli monoids ” relative to a “monad ” on a bicategory. However, the meanings of these words differ from author to author, as do the specific bicategories considered. We propose a unified framework: by working with monads on double categories and related structures (rather than bicategories), one can define generalized multicategories in a way that unifies all previous

A roadmap to the unification of weak categorical

In this paper, firstly, we introduce a higher-dimensional analogue of hypergraphs, namely ω-hypergraphs. This notion is thoroughly flexible because unlike ordinary ω-graphs, an n-dimensional edge called an n-cell has many sources and targets. Moreover, cells have polarity, with which pasting of cells is implicitly defined. As examples, we also give some known structures in terms of ω-hypergraphs. Then we specify a special type of ω-hypergraph, namely directed ω-hypergraphs, which are made of cells with direction. Finally, besed on them, we construct our weak ω-categories. It is an ω-dimensional variant of the weak n-categoreis given by Baez and Dolan [2]. We introduce ω-identical, ω-invertible and ω-universal cells instead of universality and balancedness in [2]. The whole process of our definition is in parallel with the way of regarding categories as graphs with composition and identities.

Abstract not found