Results 1 -
6 of
6
Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches.
- Review of Financial Studies
, 2009
"... Abstract In both corporate finance and asset pricing empirical work, researchers are often confronted with panel data. In these data sets, the residuals may be correlated across firms and across time, and OLS standard errors can be biased. Historically, the two literatures have used different solut ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 890 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract In both corporate finance and asset pricing empirical work, researchers are often confronted with panel data. In these data sets, the residuals may be correlated across firms and across time, and OLS standard errors can be biased. Historically, the two literatures have used different solutions to this problem. Corporate finance has relied on clustered standard errors, while asset pricing has used the Fama-MacBeth procedure to estimate standard errors. This paper examines the different methods used in the literature and explains when the different methods yield the same (and correct) standard errors and when they diverge. The intent is to provide intuition as to why the different approaches sometimes give different answers and give researchers guidance for their use.
Is There an Urban Wage Premium in Italy
- Bank of Italy, Banca D’Italia, Temi di Discussione
, 2005
"... Abstract We analyze empirically the impact of urbanization (i.e., urban agglomeration) on Italian wages, in contrast to other empirical studies on Italy that have focussed on localization effects (i.e., industrial agglomeration). How to define and measure urbanization is a matter of investigation i ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract We analyze empirically the impact of urbanization (i.e., urban agglomeration) on Italian wages, in contrast to other empirical studies on Italy that have focussed on localization effects (i.e., industrial agglomeration). How to define and measure urbanization is a matter of investigation in itself. The population distribution, for instance, is much more dispersed in Italy than in the US. Thus, whether to use the same threshold value to define a "large city" is a debatable issue. The application of spatial data analysis techniques provides us with an original tool to distinguish between urban and non-urban areas. Using micro-data from the Bank of Italy's Survey of Household Income and Wealth for the years 1995, 1998, 2000 and 2002, we estimate Mincerian wage functions and test whether city-specificities command a premium. Controlling for self-selection and endogeneity issues, we find that employees working in large cities obtain a 2-3 percent wage premium. However, when we impose a linear relationship between earnings and population mass, the estimated agglomeration effect becomes on average very small in size, though remaining statistically significant.
Does the “Community Prosecution” Strategy Reduce Crime? A Test of Chicago’s Experience
"... A new strategy of criminal prosecution, called “community prosecution, ” emerged in the past two decades. The strategy breaks with the traditional approach to prosecution in which a prosecutor works in an office adjacent to a criminal court, processes a large volume of cases, and measures success wi ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
A new strategy of criminal prosecution, called “community prosecution, ” emerged in the past two decades. The strategy breaks with the traditional approach to prosecution in which a prosecutor works in an office adjacent to a criminal court, processes a large volume of cases, and measures success with conviction rates and sentence lengths. In community prosecution, a prosecutor works directly in a neighborhood, develops rela-tionships with local groups, aligns enforcement priorities with residents ’ public safety concerns, and seeks solutions to prevent crime. This article presents the first estimates of community prosecution’s impact on crime. Over a fifteen-year period, Chicago’s top prosecutor twice applied the community prosecution strategy in some (but not all) neighborhoods, and this sequence of two “off/on ” policy episodes permits plausi-ble identification of the strategy’s impact. Differences-in-differences estimates show that community prosecution reduced certain categories of crime, such as aggravated assault, but had no effect on other categories, such as larceny. The diversity of prac-tices under the rubric of community prosecution makes generalization difficult, but the
The...
, 2009
"... FTC Bureau of Economics working papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of the Bureau of Economics, other Commission staff, or t ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
FTC Bureau of Economics working papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of the Bureau of Economics, other Commission staff, or the Commission itself. Upon request, single copies of the paper will be provided. References in publications to FTC Bureau of Economics working papers by FTC economists (other than acknowledgment by a writer that he has access to such unpublished materials) should be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers.
BUREAU OF ECONOMICS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20580ENTRY THREATS AND PRICING IN THE GENERIC DRUG INDUSTRY
, 2010
"... FTC Bureau of Economics working papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of the Bureau of Economics, other Commission staff, or t ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
FTC Bureau of Economics working papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of the Bureau of Economics, other Commission staff, or the Commission itself. Upon request, single copies of the paper will be provided. References in publications to FTC Bureau of Economics working papers by FTC economists (other than acknowledgment by a writer that he has access to such unpublished materials) should be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers.