• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Pullback and pushout constructions in C*-algebra theory (1999)

by G K Pedersen
Venue:J. Funct. Anal
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 36
Next 10 →

CANCELLATION AND STABLE RANK FOR DIRECT LIMITS OF RECURSIVE SUBHOMOGENEOUS ALGEBRAS

by N. Christopher Phillips , 2001
"... Abstract. We prove the following results for a unital simple direct limit A of recursive subhomogeneous algebras with no dimension growth: (1) tsr(A) = 1. (2) The projections in M∞(A) satisfy cancellation: if e ⊕ q ∼ f ⊕ q, then e ∼ f. (3) A satisfies Blackadar’s Second Fundamental Comparability Qu ..."
Abstract - Cited by 35 (10 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We prove the following results for a unital simple direct limit A of recursive subhomogeneous algebras with no dimension growth: (1) tsr(A) = 1. (2) The projections in M∞(A) satisfy cancellation: if e ⊕ q ∼ f ⊕ q, then e ∼ f. (3) A satisfies Blackadar’s Second Fundamental Comparability Question: if p, q ∈ M∞(A) are projections such that τ(p) < τ(q) for all normalized traces τ on A, then p � q. (4) K0(A) is unperforated for the strict order: if η ∈ K0(A) and there is n> 0 such that nη> 0, then η> 0. The last three of these results hold under certain weaker dimension growth conditions and without assuming simplicity. We use these results to obtain previously unknown information on the ordered K-theory of the crossed product C ∗ (Z, X, h) obtained from a minimal homeomorphism of an infinite finite dimensional compact metric space X. Specifically, K0(C ∗ (Z, X, h)) is unperforated
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...should also enable one to prove cancellation in the general case, and stable rank 1 in the simple case. Slow dimension growth might be more tractable for direct systems of noncommutative CW-complexes =-=[30]-=- and cell morphisms (Definition 11.3 of [30]). We do not make a serious effort here to find the right definition. Rather, we give several versions which suffice for the proofs of our theorems, and whi...

RECURSIVE SUBHOMOGENEOUS ALGEBRAS

by N. Christopher Phillips , 2001
"... Abstract. We introduce and characterize a particularly tractable class of unital type 1 C*-algebras with bounded dimension of irreducible representations. Algebras in this class are called recursive subhomogeneous algebras, and they have an inductive description (through iterated pullbacks) which al ..."
Abstract - Cited by 29 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We introduce and characterize a particularly tractable class of unital type 1 C*-algebras with bounded dimension of irreducible representations. Algebras in this class are called recursive subhomogeneous algebras, and they have an inductive description (through iterated pullbacks) which allows one to carry over from algebras of the form C(X, Mn) many of the constructions relevant in the study of the stable rank and K-theory of simple direct limits of homogeneous C*-algebras. Our characterization implies in particular that if A is a separable C*-algebra whose irreducible representations all have dimension at most N <∞, and if for each n the space of n-dimensional irreducible representations has finite covering dimension, then A is a recursive subhomogeneous algebra. We demonstrate the good properties of this class by proving subprojection and cancellation theorems in it. Consequences for simple direct limits of recursive subhomogeneous algebras, with applications to the transformation group C*-algebras of minimal homeomorphisms, will be given in a separate paper.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...and 2.16 passes to quotients. (We have dim(Primn(A/I)) ≤ dim(Primn(A)) by Proposition 3.1.5 of [25], because Primn(A/I) is a closed subset of Primn(A).) Proposition 3.2. (Compare with Theorem 11.4 of =-=[26]-=-.) Let A and B be separable recursive subhomogeneous algebras, and let ϕ: A → C and ρ: B → C be homomorphisms with ϕ unital and ρ surjective. Then A ⊕C B is a recursive subhomogeneous algebra. Moreove...

THE K-THEORY OF HEEGAARD-TYPE QUANTUM 3-SPHERES Dedicated to the memory of Olaf Richter.

by Paul Baum, Piotr M. Hajac, Instytut Matematyczny, Polska Akademia Nauk, Katedra Metod, Matematycznych Fizyki, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Rainer Matthes, Wojciech Szymański , 2004
"... We use a Heegaard splitting of the topological 3-sphere as a guiding principle to construct a family of its noncommutative deformations. The main technical point is an identification of the universal C ∗-algebras defining our quantum 3-spheres with an appropriate fiber product of crossed-product C ∗ ..."
Abstract - Cited by 20 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
We use a Heegaard splitting of the topological 3-sphere as a guiding principle to construct a family of its noncommutative deformations. The main technical point is an identification of the universal C ∗-algebras defining our quantum 3-spheres with an appropriate fiber product of crossed-product C ∗-algebras. Then we employ this result to show that the K-groups of our family of noncommutative 3-spheres coincide with their classical counterparts. 1

Crossed products by finite group actions with the Rokhlin property

by Hiroyuki Osaka, N. Christopher Phillips , 2009
"... We prove that a number of classes of separable unital C*-algebras are closed under crossed products by finite group actions with the Rokhlin property, including: • AI algebras, AT algebras, and related classes characterized by direct limit decompositions using semiprojective building blocks. • Sim ..."
Abstract - Cited by 19 (7 self) - Add to MetaCart
We prove that a number of classes of separable unital C*-algebras are closed under crossed products by finite group actions with the Rokhlin property, including: • AI algebras, AT algebras, and related classes characterized by direct limit decompositions using semiprojective building blocks. • Simple unital AH algebras with slow dimension growth and real rank zero. • C*-algebras with real rank zero or stable rank one. • Simple C*-algebras for which the order on projections is determined by traces. • C*-algebras whose quotients all satisfy the Universal Coefficient Theorem. • C*-algebras with a unique tracial state. Along the way, we give a systematic treatment of the derivation of direct limit decompositions from local approximation conditions by homomorphic images which are not necessarily injective.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...2 would fail. We now consider one dimensional noncommutative CW complexes. This class requires some preliminary work. We recall Definition 2.4.1 of [12] (which is a special case of Definition 11.2 of =-=[27]-=-): Definition 2.5. A one dimensional noncommutative CW complex is a C*-algebra A of the form A = { (a, f) ∈ F0 ⊕ C([0, 1], F1): f(0) = ϕ0(a) and f(1) = ϕ1(a) } , where F0 and F1 are finite dimensional...

On embeddings of full amalgamated free product of C∗-algebras

by Scott Armstrong, Ken Dykema, Ruy Exel, Hanfeng Li - Proc. Amer. Math. Soc
"... Abstract. We examine the question of when the ∗–homomorphism λ: A∗DB → A ̃ ∗ eD B ̃ of full amalgamated free product C∗–algebras, arising from compatible inclusions of C∗–algebras A ⊆ Ã, B ⊆ B ̃ and D ⊆ D̃, is an embedding. Results giving sufficient conditions for λ to be injective, as well of cla ..."
Abstract - Cited by 10 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We examine the question of when the ∗–homomorphism λ: A∗DB → A ̃ ∗ eD B ̃ of full amalgamated free product C∗–algebras, arising from compatible inclusions of C∗–algebras A ⊆ Ã, B ⊆ B ̃ and D ⊆ D̃, is an embedding. Results giving sufficient conditions for λ to be injective, as well of classes of examples where λ fails to be injective, are obtained. As an application, we give necessary and sufficient condition for the full amalgamated free product of finite dimensional C∗–algebras to be residually finite dimensional. 1.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ism λD is surjective), or (ii) there are conditional expectations EA : Ã→ A and EB : B̃ → B that send D̃ onto D and agree on D̃. Injectivity in the case D = D̃ was previously proved by G.K. Pedersen =-=[10]-=-. (Moreover, earlier results of F. Boca [4] imply that the map λ is injective when D = D̃ and when there are conditional expectations à E eA A→ A E A D→ D E B D← B E eB B← B̃; an argument for the cas...

On Rørdam’s classification of certain C∗-algebras with one non-trivial ideal, II

by Gunnar Restorff, Efren Ruiz , 2007
"... In this paper we extend the classification results obtained by Rørdam in the paper [16]. We prove a strong classification theorem for the unital essential extensions of Kirchberg algebras, a classification theorem for the non-stable, non-unital essential extensions of Kirchberg algebras, and we char ..."
Abstract - Cited by 10 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper we extend the classification results obtained by Rørdam in the paper [16]. We prove a strong classification theorem for the unital essential extensions of Kirchberg algebras, a classification theorem for the non-stable, non-unital essential extensions of Kirchberg algebras, and we characterize the range in both cases. The invariants are cyclic six term exact sequences together with the class of some unit.

Amalgamated free products of C∗-bundles

by Etienne Blanchard , 2007
"... Given two unital continuous C∗-bundles A and B over the same compact Hausdorff base space X, we study the continuity properties of their different amalgamated free products over C(X). ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
Given two unital continuous C∗-bundles A and B over the same compact Hausdorff base space X, we study the continuity properties of their different amalgamated free products over C(X).
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...AsC(X) B amalgamated over C(X) is a continuous C∗-bundle over X with fibres Ax M⊗Bx. But there are also other canonical amalgamated products over C(X), such as the completions considered by Pedersen (=-=[26]-=-) and Voiculescu ([32]) of the algebraic amalgamated free product A ~ C(X) B of two unital continuous C∗-bundles A and B over the same compact Hausdorff space X. The point of this paper is to study wh...

Decomposition rank of subhomogeneous C∗-algebras

by Wilhelm Winter - Proc. London Math. Soc
"... In [4], E. Kirchberg and the author introduced the decomposition rank; this is a non-commutative generalization of topological covering dimension. If A is a nuclear C-algebra, the decomposition rank of A, drA, is de0ned by imposing a certain condition on systems of completely positive (c.p.) approxi ..."
Abstract - Cited by 6 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
In [4], E. Kirchberg and the author introduced the decomposition rank; this is a non-commutative generalization of topological covering dimension. If A is a nuclear C-algebra, the decomposition rank of A, drA, is de0ned by imposing a certain condition on systems of completely positive (c.p.) approximations of A; see
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...cursive subhomogeneous of topological dimension n, and prove its easy part; we also give a non-unital version. Furthermore, we consider various examples, including the non-commutative CW-complexes of =-=[9]-=- and C-algebras of minimal di7eomorphisms. The remaining sections are devoted to the proof of the diGcult part of the theorem. Since our argument is quite complicated, we 0rst describe the ideas in t...

Reduction of the dimension of nuclear C∗-algebras

by Luis Santiago , 1211
"... ar ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...π1 : A⊕C B → A and π2 : A⊕C B → B the projections maps associated to this pullback. That is, the maps defined by π1(a, b) = a and π2(a, b) = b for (a, b) ∈ A⊕C B. The following is Proposition 3.1. of =-=[21]-=-. Proposition 2.6. A commutative diagram of C*-algebras X π1 π2 // B ψ A φ // C is a pullback if and only if the following conditions hold: (i) Ker(π1) ∩Ker(π2) = {0}, (ii) ψ−1(φ(A)) = π2(X), (i...

The homotopy lifting theorem for semiprojective C*-algebras. arXiv:1207.1909

by Bruce Blackadar , 2012
"... ar ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University