Results 1 - 10
of
142
Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey
, 2006
"... We review the literature on semi-supervised learning, which is an area in machine learning and more generally, artificial intelligence. There has been a whole
spectrum of interesting ideas on how to learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, i.e. semi-supervised learning. This document is a chapter ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 782 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We review the literature on semi-supervised learning, which is an area in machine learning and more generally, artificial intelligence. There has been a whole
spectrum of interesting ideas on how to learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, i.e. semi-supervised learning. This document is a chapter excerpt from the author’s
doctoral thesis (Zhu, 2005). However the author plans to update the online version frequently to incorporate the latest development in the field. Please obtain the latest
version at http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~jerryzhu/pub/ssl_survey.pdf
Building Text Classifiers using Positive and Unlabeled Examples
- In Proc. of the ICDM’03
, 2003
"... This paper studies the problem of building text classifiers using positive and unlabeled examples. The key feature of this problem is that there is no negative example for learning. Recently, a few techniques for solving this problem were proposed in the literature. These techniques are based on the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 116 (17 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper studies the problem of building text classifiers using positive and unlabeled examples. The key feature of this problem is that there is no negative example for learning. Recently, a few techniques for solving this problem were proposed in the literature. These techniques are based on the same idea, which builds a classifier in two steps. Each existing technique uses a different method for each step. In this paper, we first introduce some new methods for the two steps, and perform a comprehensive evaluation of all possible combinations of methods of the two steps. We then propose a more principled approach to solving the problem based on a biased formulation of SVM, and show experimentally that it is more accurate than the existing techniques. 1.
Learning to classify text using positive and unlabeled data
- In: Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on artificial intelligence
, 2003
"... In traditional text classification, a classifier is built using labeled training documents of every class. This paper studies a different problem. Given a set P of documents of a particular class (called positive class) and a set U of unlabeled documents that contains documents from class P and also ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 94 (17 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In traditional text classification, a classifier is built using labeled training documents of every class. This paper studies a different problem. Given a set P of documents of a particular class (called positive class) and a set U of unlabeled documents that contains documents from class P and also other types of documents (called negative class documents), we want to build a classifier to classify the documents in U into documents from P and documents not from P. The key feature of this problem is that there is no labeled negative document, which makes traditional text classification techniques inapplicable. In this paper, we propose an effective technique to solve the problem. It combines the Rocchio method and the SVM technique for classifier building. Experimental results show that the new method outperforms existing methods significantly. 1
Text classification by labeling words
- In Proceedings of the American Conference of Artificial Intelligence
, 2004
"... Traditionally, text classifiers are built from labeled training examples. Labeling is usually done manually by human experts (or the users), which is a labor intensive and time consuming process. In the past few years, researchers investigated various forms of semi-supervised learning to reduce the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 66 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Traditionally, text classifiers are built from labeled training examples. Labeling is usually done manually by human experts (or the users), which is a labor intensive and time consuming process. In the past few years, researchers investigated various forms of semi-supervised learning to reduce the burden of manual labeling. In this paper, we propose a different approach. Instead of labeling a set of documents, the proposed method labels a set of representative words for each class. It then uses these words to extract a set of documents for each class from a set of unlabeled documents to form the initial training set. The EM algorithm is then applied to build the classifier. The key issue of the approach is how to obtain a set of representative words for each class. One way is to ask the user to provide them, which is difficult because the user usually can only give a few words (which are insufficient for accurate learning). We propose a method to solve the problem. It combines clustering and feature selection. The technique can effectively rank the words in the unlabeled set according to their importance. The user then selects/labels some words from the ranked list for each class. This process requires less effort than providing words with no help or manual labeling of documents. Our results show that the new method is highly effective and promising.
Transferring naive bayes classifiers for text classification
- In Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, 2007
"... A basic assumption in traditional machine learning is that the training and test data distributions should be identical. This assumption may not hold in many situations in practice, but we may be forced to rely on a different-distribution data to learn a prediction model. For example, this may be th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 58 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A basic assumption in traditional machine learning is that the training and test data distributions should be identical. This assumption may not hold in many situations in practice, but we may be forced to rely on a different-distribution data to learn a prediction model. For example, this may be the case when it is expensive to label the data in a domain of interest, although in a related but different domain there may be plenty of labeled data available. In this paper, we propose a novel transfer-learning algorithm for text classification based on an EM-based Naive Bayes classifiers. Our solution is to first estimate the initial probabilities under a distribution Dℓ of one labeled data set, and then use an EM algorithm to revise the model for a different distribution Du of the test data which are unlabeled. We show that our algorithm is very effective in several different pairs of domains, where the distances between the different distributions are measured using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Moreover, KL-divergence is used to decide the trade-off parameters in our algorithm. In the experiment, our algorithm outperforms the traditional supervised and semi-supervised learning algorithms when the distributions of the training and test sets are increasingly different.
Learning with Positive and Unlabeled Examples Using Weighted Logistic Regression
- Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML
, 2003
"... The problem of learning with positive and unlabeled examples arises frequently in retrieval applications. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 57 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The problem of learning with positive and unlabeled examples arises frequently in retrieval applications.
Multimedia search with pseudo-relevance feedback
- In Intl Conf on Image and Video Retrieval
, 2003
"... We present an algorithm for video retrieval that fuses the decisions of multiple retrieval agents in both text and image modalities. While the normalization and combination of evidence is novel, this paper emphasizes the successful use of negative pseudo-relevance feedback to improve image retrieval ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 55 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present an algorithm for video retrieval that fuses the decisions of multiple retrieval agents in both text and image modalities. While the normalization and combination of evidence is novel, this paper emphasizes the successful use of negative pseudo-relevance feedback to improve image retrieval performance. Although we have not solved all problems in video information retrieval, the results are encouraging, indicating that pseudo-relevance feedback shows great promise for multimedia retrieval with very varied and errorful data. 1 Video Retrieval from Mixed Text and Image Queries In this paper, we present an algorithm for the task of video retrieval. A query, consisting of a text description plus images or video is posed against a video collection, and relevant shots are to be retrieved. Our system accomplishes this by fusing the retrieval results of multiple retrieval agents. The overall system can be decomposed into several agents, including a text-oriented retrieval agent, which is responsible for finding the text in the speech transcripts [4] and Video OCR [3], a
PEBL: Web Page Classification without Negative Examples
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
, 2004
"... Web page classification is one of the essential techniques for Web mining because classifying Web pages of an interesting class is often the first step of mining the Web. However, constructing a classifier for an interesting class requires laborious preprocessing such as collecting positive and ne ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 48 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Web page classification is one of the essential techniques for Web mining because classifying Web pages of an interesting class is often the first step of mining the Web. However, constructing a classifier for an interesting class requires laborious preprocessing such as collecting positive and negative training examples. For instance, in order to construct a "homepage" classifier, one needs to collect a sample of homepages (positive examples) and a sample of nonhomepages (negative examples). In particular, collecting negative training examples requires arduous work and caution to avoid bias. This paper presents a framework, called Positive Example Based Learning (PEBL), for Web page classification which eliminates the need for manually collecting negative training examples in preprocessing. The PEBL framework applies an algorithm, called Mapping-Convergence (M-C), to achieve high classification accuracy (with positive and unlabeled data) as high as that of a traditional SVM (with positive and negative data). M-C runs in two stages: the mapping stage and convergence stage. In the mapping stage, the algorithm uses a weak classifier that draws an initial approximation of "strong" negative data. Based on the initial approximation, the convergence stage iteratively runs an internal classifier (e.g., SVM) which maximizes margins to progressively improve the approximation of negative data. Thus, the class boundary eventually converges to the true boundary of the positive class in the feature space. We present the M-C algorithm with supporting theoretical and experimental justifications. Our experiments show that, given the same set of positive examples, the M-C algorithm outperforms one-class SVMs, and it is almost as accurate as the traditional SVMs.
Semi-Supervised Novelty Detection
, 2010
"... A common setting for novelty detection assumes that labeled examples from the nominal class are available, but that labeled examples of novelties are unavailable. The standard (inductive) approach is to declare novelties where the nominal density is low, which reduces the problem to density level se ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 31 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
A common setting for novelty detection assumes that labeled examples from the nominal class are available, but that labeled examples of novelties are unavailable. The standard (inductive) approach is to declare novelties where the nominal density is low, which reduces the problem to density level set estimation. In this paper, we consider the setting where an unlabeled and possibly contaminated sample is also available at learning time. We argue that novelty detection in this semi-supervised setting is naturally solved by a general reduction to a binary classification problem. In particular, a detector with a desired false positive rate can be achieved through a reduction to Neyman-Pearson classification. Unlike the inductive approach, semi-supervised novelty detection (SSND) yields detectors that are optimal (e.g., statistically consistent) regardless of the distribution on novelties. Therefore, in novelty detection, unlabeled data have a substantial impact on the theoretical properties of the decision rule. We validate the practical utility of SSND with an extensive experimental study. We also show that SSND provides distribution-free, learning-theoretic solutions to two well known problems in hypothesis testing. First, our results provide a general solution to the general two-sample problem, that is, the problem of determining whether two random samples arise from the same distribution. Second, a specialization of SSND coincides with the standard p-value approach to multiple testing under the so-called random effects model. Unlike standard rejection regions based on thresholded p-values, the general SSND framework allows for adaptation to arbitrary alternative distributions in multiple dimensions.
