Results 1 -
6 of
6
R.: Simultaneous learning of a discriminative projection and prototypes for nearest-neighbor classification
- In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2008
, 2008
"... Computer vision and image recognition research have a great interest in dimensionality reduction techniques. Generally these techniques are independent of the classifier being used and the learning of the classifier is carried out after the dimensionality reduction is performed, possibly discarding ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 10 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Computer vision and image recognition research have a great interest in dimensionality reduction techniques. Generally these techniques are independent of the classifier being used and the learning of the classifier is carried out after the dimensionality reduction is performed, possibly discarding valuable information. In this paper we propose an iterative algorithm that simultaneously learns a linear projection base and a reduced set of prototypes optimized for the Nearest-Neighbor classifier. The algorithm is derived by minimizing a suitable estimation of the classification error probability. The proposed approach is assessed through a series of experiments showing a good behavior and a real potential for practical applications. 1.
Centre of Intelligent Machines
"... Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a popular tool for multiclass discriminative dimensionality reduction. However, LDA suffers from two major problems: (1) It only optimizes the Bayes error for the case of unimodal Gaussian classes with equal covariances (assuming full rank matrices) and, (2) The ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a popular tool for multiclass discriminative dimensionality reduction. However, LDA suffers from two major problems: (1) It only optimizes the Bayes error for the case of unimodal Gaussian classes with equal covariances (assuming full rank matrices) and, (2) The multiclass extension maximizes the sum of pairwise distances between the classes, and does not “simultaneously” maximize each pairwise distance between the classes. This typically results in serious overlapping in the projected space between classes that are “close ” in the input space. To solve these two problems, this paper proposes Pareto Discriminant Analysis (PARDA). Firstly, PARDA explicitly models each of the classes as a multidimensional Gaussian with a sample covariance. Secondly, PARDA decomposes the multiclass problem to a set of pairwise objective functions representing the pairwise distance between different classes. Unlike existing extensions of Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) to multiclass problems, that typically maximize the sum of pairwise distances between classes, PARDA simultaneously maximizes each pairwise distance, thus encouraging the case that all classes are equidistant from each other in the lower dimensional space. Solving PARDA is a multiobjective optimization problem – simultaneously optimizing more than one, possibly conflicting, objective functions – and the resulting solution is known to be “Pareto Optimal”. Experimental results on synthetic data, several image data sets and data sets from the UCI repository show positive and encouraging results in favor of PARDA when compared with standard and state-of-the-art multiclass extensions of LDA. 1.
Generalized Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis
"... A Generalized Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis (GNDA) method is proposed, which implements Fisher discriminant analysis in a nonlinear mapping space. Linear discriminant analysis in the nonlinear mapping space corresponds to nonlinear discriminant analysis in an input space. GNDA suggests a unified f ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
A Generalized Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis (GNDA) method is proposed, which implements Fisher discriminant analysis in a nonlinear mapping space. Linear discriminant analysis in the nonlinear mapping space corresponds to nonlinear discriminant analysis in an input space. GNDA suggests a unified framework of nonlinear discriminant analysis which includes the kernel Fisher discriminant analysis as a specific case. Experimental results on UCI data sets demonstrate the validity of our method. 1.
1 A Least-Squares Framework for Component Analysis
, 2009
"... Over the last century, Component Analysis (CA) methods such as Principal Component Analysis ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Over the last century, Component Analysis (CA) methods such as Principal Component Analysis
A Least-Squares Framework for Component Analysis
, 2009
"... ... (SC) have been extensively used as a feature extraction step for modeling, clustering, classification, and visualization. CA techniques are appealing because many can be formulated as eigen-problems, offering great potential for learning linear and non-linear representations of data in closed-fo ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
... (SC) have been extensively used as a feature extraction step for modeling, clustering, classification, and visualization. CA techniques are appealing because many can be formulated as eigen-problems, offering great potential for learning linear and non-linear representations of data in closed-form. However, the eigen-formulation often conceals important analytic and computational drawbacks of CA techniques, such as solving generalized eigen-problems with rank deficient matrices (e.g., small sample size problem), lacking intuitive interpretation of normalization factors, and understanding commonalities and differences between CA methods. This paper proposes a unified least-squares framework to formulate many CA methods. We show how PCA, LDA, CCA, LE, SC, and their kernel and regularized extensions, correspond to a particular instance of least-squares weighted kernel reduced rank regression (LS-WKRRR). The LS-WKRRR formulation of CA methods has several benefits: (1) provides a clean connection between many CA techniques and an intuitive framework to understand normalization factors; (2) yields efficient numerical schemes to solve CA techniques; (3) overcomes the small sample size problem; (4) provides a framework to easily extend CA methods. We derive new weighted generalizations of PCA, LDA, CCA and SC, and several novel CA techniques.
Chernoff Dimensionality Reduction–Where Fisher Meets FKT ∗
"... Well known linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on the Fisher criterion is incapable of dealing with heteroscedasticityindata. However, inmanypractical applications weoften encounter heteroscedastic data, i.e., within-class scatter matrices can not be expected to be equal. A technique based on t ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Well known linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on the Fisher criterion is incapable of dealing with heteroscedasticityindata. However, inmanypractical applications weoften encounter heteroscedastic data, i.e., within-class scatter matrices can not be expected to be equal. A technique based on theChernoff criterion for linear dimensionality reductionhas been proposed recently. The technique extends well-known Fisher’s LDA and is capable of exploiting information about heteroscedasticity in the data. While the Chernoff criterion has been shown to outperform the Fisher’s, a clear understanding of its exact behavior is lacking. In addition, the criterion, as introduced, is rather complex, making it difficult to clearly state its relationship to other linear dimensionality reduction techniques. In this paper, we show precisely what can be expected from the Chernoff criterion and its relations to the Fisher criterion and Fukunaga-Koontz transform. Furthermore, we show that a recently proposed decomposition of the data space into four subspaces is incomplete. We provide arguments on how to best enrich the decomposition of the data space in order to account for heteroscedasticity in the data. Finally, we provide experimental results validating our theoretical analysis. 1

