Citation Context

...ndaries on visual perception, even for visual field locations far from those boundaries. Introduction It is well established that the perception of objects is degraded with increasing distance from the fovea (Low, 1951). However, perceptual performance also varies across different visual field locations for eccentricities that have been equalized in terms of visual angle from fixation (Carrasco, Giordano, & McElree, 2004; Carrasco, Talgar, & Cameron, 2001; Finger & Spelt, 1947). Horizontal visual field asymmetries often reflect functional hemispheric differences (e.g., Ivry & Robertson, 1997; Piazza & Silver, 2014), but there are also Citation: Fortenbaugh, F. C., Silver, M. A., & Robertson, L. C. (2015). Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding. Journal of Vision, 15(2):19, 1–15, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/15/2/19, doi:10.1167/15.2.19. Journal of Vision (2015) 15(2):19, 1–15 1http://www.journalofvision.org/content/15/2/19 doi: 10 .1167 /15 .2 .19 ISSN 1534-7362 2015 ARVOReceived April 30, 2014; published February 12, 2015 Downloaded from jov.arvojournals.org on 06/29/2019 reliable behavioral differences...