Results 1 - 10
of
33
Human-robot interaction: a survey
- Found & Trends in HCI 1(3):203–275
, 2007
"... Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) has recently received considerable attention in the academic community, in labs, in technology companies, and through the media. Because of this attention, it is desirable to present a survey of HRI to serve as a tutorial to people outside the field and to promote discu ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 64 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) has recently received considerable attention in the academic community, in labs, in technology companies, and through the media. Because of this attention, it is desirable to present a survey of HRI to serve as a tutorial to people outside the field and to promote discussion of a unified vision of HRI within the field. The goal of this review is to present a unified treatment of HRI-related problems, to identify key themes, and discuss challenge problems that are likely to shape the field in the near future. Although the review follows a survey structure, the goal of presenting a coherent “story ” of HRI means that there are necessarily some well-written, intriguing, and influential papers that are not referenced. Instead of trying to survey every paper, we describe the HRI story from multiple perspectives with an eye toward identifying themes that cross applications. The survey attempts to include papers that represent a fair cross section of the universities, government efforts, industry labs, and countries that contribute to HRI, and a cross section of the disciplines that contribute to the field, such as human, factors, robotics, cognitive
How may I serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context
- In Proc. of the ACM International Conference on Human Robot Interaction HRI 06
"... This paper presents the combined results of two studies that investigated how a robot should best approach and place itself relative to a seated human subject. Two live Human Robot Interaction (HRI) trials were performed involving a robot fetching an object that the human had requested, using differ ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 60 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper presents the combined results of two studies that investigated how a robot should best approach and place itself relative to a seated human subject. Two live Human Robot Interaction (HRI) trials were performed involving a robot fetching an object that the human had requested, using different approach directions. Results of the trials indicated that most subjects disliked a frontal approach, except for a small minority of females, and most subjects preferred to be approached from either the left or right side, with a small overall preference for a right approach by the robot. Handedness and occupation were not related to these preferences. We discuss the results of the user studies in the context of developing a path planning system for a mobile robot.
A Human Aware Mobile Robot Motion Planner
"... Abstract — Robot navigation in the presence of humans raises new issues for motion planning and control when the humans must be taken explicitly into account. We claim that a humanaware motion planner must not only provide safe robot paths, but also synthesize good, socially acceptable and legible p ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 56 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — Robot navigation in the presence of humans raises new issues for motion planning and control when the humans must be taken explicitly into account. We claim that a humanaware motion planner must not only provide safe robot paths, but also synthesize good, socially acceptable and legible paths. This paper focuses on a motion planner that takes explicitly into account its human partners by reasoning about their accessibility, their vision field and their preferences in terms of relative human-robot placement and motions in realistic environments. This planner is part of a human-aware motion and manipulation planning and control system that we aim to develop in order to achieve motion and manipulation tasks in the presence or in synergy with humans. Index Terms — HRI, Motion Planning, Social Interaction I.
Natural person-following behavior for social robots
- In Proc. HRI ’07, ACM
, 2007
"... We are developing robots with socially appropriate spatial skills not only to travel around or near people, but also to accompany people side-by-side. As a step toward this goal, we are investigating the social perceptions of a robot’s movement as it follows behind a person. This paper discusses our ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 50 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We are developing robots with socially appropriate spatial skills not only to travel around or near people, but also to accompany people side-by-side. As a step toward this goal, we are investigating the social perceptions of a robot’s movement as it follows behind a person. This paper discusses our laser-based person-tracking method and two different approaches to person-following: direction-following and path-following. While both algorithms have similar characteristics in terms of tracking performance and following distances, participants in a pilot study rated the direction-following behavior as significantly more humanlike and natural than the path-following behavior. We argue that the path-following method may still be more appropriate in some situations, and we propose that the ideal personfollowing behavior may be a hybrid approach, with the robot automatically selecting which method to use.
Close encounters: Spatial distances between people and a robot of mechanistic appearance
- in Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots
, 2005
"... Abstract- This paper presents the results from two empirical exploratory studies of human-robot interaction in the context of an initial encounter with a robot of mechanistic appearance. The first study was carried out with groups of children, and the second with single adults. The analysis concentr ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 32 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract- This paper presents the results from two empirical exploratory studies of human-robot interaction in the context of an initial encounter with a robot of mechanistic appearance. The first study was carried out with groups of children, and the second with single adults. The analysis concentrates on the personal space zones and initial distances between robot and humans, the context of the encounters and the human’s perception of the robot as a social being. We discuss the results of these observations and analyses, and also compare the child and adult data. The child groups showed a dominant response to prefer the ‘social zone ’ distance, comparable to distances people adopt when talking to other humans. From the single adult studies a small majority preferred the ‘personal zone’, reserved for talking to friends. However, significant minorities deviate from this pattern. Implications for future work are discussed.
A spatial model of engagement for a social robot
- The 9th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, AMC06
, 2006
"... Abstract — Even if a socially interactive robot has perfect information about the location, pose, and movement of humans in the environment, it is unclear how this information should be used to enable the initiation, maintenance, and termination of social interactions. We review models that have bee ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 27 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — Even if a socially interactive robot has perfect information about the location, pose, and movement of humans in the environment, it is unclear how this information should be used to enable the initiation, maintenance, and termination of social interactions. We review models that have been developed to describe social engagement based on spatial relationships and describe a system developed for use on a robotic receptionist. The system uses spatial information from a laser tracker and head pose information from a camera to classify people in a categorical model of engagement. The robot’s behaviors are determined by the presence of people in these different levels. We evaluate the system using observational behavioral analysis of recorded interactions between the robot and humans. This analysis suggests improvements to the current system: namely, to put a stonger emphasis on movement in the estimation of social engagement and to vary the timing of interactive behaviors. I.
Methodological issues in hri: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials
- In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
, 2006
"... Abstract-The main aim of this study was to confirm the findings from previous pilot studies that results obtained from the same Human Robot Interaction (HRI) scenarios in trials using both video-based and live methodologies were comparable. We investigated how a robot should approach human subjects ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 26 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract-The main aim of this study was to confirm the findings from previous pilot studies that results obtained from the same Human Robot Interaction (HRI) scenarios in trials using both video-based and live methodologies were comparable. We investigated how a robot should approach human subjects in various scenarios relevant to the robot fetching an object for the subject. These scenarios include a human subject sitting in an open space, sitting at a table, standing in an open space and standing against a wall. The subjects experienced the robot approaching from various directions for each of these contexts in HRI trials that were both live and video-based. There was a high degree of agreement between the results obtained from both the live and video based trials using the same scenarios. The main findings from both types of trial methodology were: Humans strongly did not like a direct frontal approach by a robot, especially while sitting (even at a table) or while standing with their back to a wall. An approach from the front left or front right was preferred. When standing in an open space a frontal approach was more acceptable and although a rear approach was not usually most preferred, it was generally acceptable to subjects if physically more convenient.
COMPANION: A constraint-optimizing method for person-acceptable navigation
- IN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION
, 2009
"... This paper introduces the COMPANION framework: ..."
(Show Context)
Human-robot proxemics: physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction. In Human-robot interaction (pp. 331–338). doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957786
- In Intelligent robots and systems
, 2011
"... To seamlessly integrate into the human physical and social environment, robots must display appropriate proxemic behavior—that is, follow societal norms in establishing their physical and psychological distancing with people. Socialscientific theories suggest competing models of human proxemic behav ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
To seamlessly integrate into the human physical and social environment, robots must display appropriate proxemic behavior—that is, follow societal norms in establishing their physical and psychological distancing with people. Socialscientific theories suggest competing models of human proxemic behavior, but all conclude that individuals ’ proxemic behavior is shaped by the proxemic behavior of others and the individual’s psychological closeness to them. The present study explores whether these models can also explain how people physically and psychologically distance themselves from robots and suggest guidelines for future design of proxemic behaviors for robots. In a controlled laboratory experiment, participants interacted with Wakamaru to perform two tasks that examined physical and psychological distancing of the participants. We manipulated the likeability (likeable/dislikeable) and gaze behavior (mutual gaze/averted gaze) of the robot. Our results on physical distancing showed that participants who disliked the robot compensated for the increase in the robot’s gaze by maintaining a greater physical distance from the robot, while participants who liked the robot did not differ in their distancing from the robot across gaze conditions. The results on psychological distancing suggest that those who disliked the robot also disclosed less to the robot. Our results offer guidelines for the design of appropriate proxemic behaviors for robots so as to facilitate effective human-robot interaction.
Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robot, Auton
- Robots
, 2006
"... communication display behaviors to an autonomous humanoid robot, including the use of proxemics, which to date has been seldom explored in the field of human-robot interaction. In order to allow the robot to communicate information non-verbally while simultaneously fulfilling its existing instrument ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
communication display behaviors to an autonomous humanoid robot, including the use of proxemics, which to date has been seldom explored in the field of human-robot interaction. In order to allow the robot to communicate information non-verbally while simultaneously fulfilling its existing instrumental behavior, a “behavioral overlay ” model that encodes this data onto the robot’s pre-existing motor expression is developed and presented. The state of the robot’s system of internal emotions and motivational drives is used as the principal data source for non-verbal expression, but in order for the robot to display this information in a natural and nuanced fashion, an additional para-emotional framework has been developed to support the individuality of the robot’s interpersonal relationships with humans and of the robot itself. An implementation on the Sony QRIO is described which overlays QRIO’s existing EGO architecture and situated schema-based behaviors with a mechanism for communicating this framework through modalities that encompass posture, gesture and the management of interpersonal distance. 1