Results 1 - 10
of
1,369
Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge.
- Teachers College Record,
, 2006
"... Abstract This paper describes a framework for teacher knowledge for technology integration called technological pedagogical content knowledge (originally TPCK, now known as TPACK, or technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge). This framework builds on Lee Shulman's construct of pedagogical c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 420 (19 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract This paper describes a framework for teacher knowledge for technology integration called technological pedagogical content knowledge (originally TPCK, now known as TPACK, or technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge). This framework builds on Lee Shulman's construct of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to include technology knowledge. The development of TPACK by teachers is critical to effective teaching with technology. The paper begins with a brief introduction to the complex, illstructured nature of teaching. The nature of technologies (both analog and digital) is considered, as well as how the inclusion of technology in pedagogy further complicates teaching. The TPACK framework for teacher knowledge is described in detail, as a complex interaction among three bodies of knowledge: Content, pedagogy, and technology. The interaction of these bodies of knowledge, both theoretically and in practice, produces the types of flexible knowledge needed to successfully integrate technology use into teaching. Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1) Contemporary Issues in 61 As educators know, teaching is a complicated practice that requires an interweaving of many kinds of specialized knowledge. In this way, teaching is an example of an illstructured discipline, requiring teachers to apply complex knowledge structures across different cases and contexts The Challenges of Teaching With Technology Teaching with technology is complicated further considering the challenges newer technologies present to teachers. In our work, the word technology applies equally to analog and digital, as well as new and old, technologies. As a matter of practical significance, however, most of the technologies under consideration in current literature are newer and digital and have some inherent properties that make applying them in straightforward ways difficult. Most traditional pedagogical technologies are characterized by specificity (a pencil is for writing, while a microscope is for viewing small objects); stability (pencils, pendulums, and chalkboards have not changed a great deal over time); and transparency of function (the inner workings of the pencil or the pendulum are simple and directly related to their function) Also complicating teaching with technology is an understanding that technologies are neither neutral nor unbiased. Rather, particular technologies have their own propensities, potentials, affordances, and constraints that make them more suitable for certain tasks than others Social and contextual factors also complicate the relationships between teaching and technology. Social and institutional contexts are often unsupportive of teachers' efforts to integrate technology use into their work. Teachers often have inadequate (or Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1) 62 inappropriate) experience with using digital technologies for teaching and learning. Many teachers earned degrees at a time when educational technology was at a very different stage of development than it is today. It is, thus, not surprising that they do not consider themselves sufficiently prepared to use technology in the classroom and often do not appreciate its value or relevance to teaching and learning. Acquiring a new knowledge base and skill set can be challenging, particularly if it is a time-intensive activity that must fit into a busy schedule. Moreover, this knowledge is unlikely to be used unless teachers can conceive of technology uses that are consistent with their existing pedagogical beliefs An Approach to Thinking About Technology Integration Faced with these challenges, how can teachers integrate technology into their teaching? An approach is needed that treats teaching as an interaction between what teachers know and how they apply what they know in the unique circumstances or contexts within their classrooms. There is no "one best way" to integrate technology into curriculum. Rather, integration efforts should be creatively designed or structured for particular subject matter ideas in specific classroom contexts. Honoring the idea that teaching with technology is a complex, ill-structured task, we propose that understanding approaches to successful technology integration requires educators to develop new ways of comprehending and accommodating this complexity. At the heart of good teaching with technology are three core components: content, pedagogy, and technology, plus the relationships among and between them. The interactions between and among the three components, playing out differently across diverse contexts, account for the wide variations seen in the extent and quality of educational technology integration. These three knowledge bases (content, pedagogy, and technology) form the core of the technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework.
Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special
- Journal of Teacher Education
, 2008
"... While teacher content knowledge is crucially important to the improvement of teaching and learning, attention to its development and study has been uneven. Historically, researchers have focused on many aspects of teaching, but more often than not scant attention has been given to how teachers need ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 187 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
While teacher content knowledge is crucially important to the improvement of teaching and learning, attention to its development and study has been uneven. Historically, researchers have focused on many aspects of teaching, but more often than not scant attention has been given to how teachers need to understand the subjects they teach. Further, when researchers, educators and policy makers have turned attention to teacher subject matter knowledge the assumption has often been that advanced study in the subject is what matters. Debates have focused on how much preparation teachers need in the content strands rather than on what type of content they need to learn. In the mid-1980s, a major breakthrough initiated a new wave of interest in the conceptualization of teacher content knowledge. In his 1985 AERA presidential address, Lee Shulman identified a special domain of teacher knowledge, which he referred to as pedagogical content knowledge. He distinguished between content as it is studied and learned in disciplinary settings and the “special amalgam of content and pedagogy ” needed for teaching the subject. These ideas had a major impact on the research community, immediately focusing attention on the foundational importance of content knowledge in teaching and on pedagogical content knowledge in particular. This paper provides a brief overview of research on content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge, describes how we have approached the problem, and reports on our efforts to define the domain of mathematical knowledge for teaching and to refine its sub-domains.
With an eye to the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching . . .
- IN J. BROPHY (ED.), ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON TEACHING
, 1990
"... The tendrils of this famous passage still wind around current discourse about the improvement of instruction. This paper revisits Bruner's oft-quoted assertion that "any subject can be taught effectively in some intellectually honest form. " While my aim is not to suggest that he w ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 170 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The tendrils of this famous passage still wind around current discourse about the improvement of instruction. This paper revisits Bruner's oft-quoted assertion that "any subject can be taught effectively in some intellectually honest form. " While my aim is not to suggest that he was wrong, I seek to persuade the reader that figuring out what it might mean to create a practice of teaching that is "intellectually honest " is a project laden with thorny dilemmas and that teachers need to be prepared to face off with the uncertainties inherent in the goal. The new mathematics, science, and history curricula that swept the United States during the 1960s in the wake of Bruner's hypothesis gave us ample evidence that acting on his claim is not easy. This paper takes up the challenge in the particular context of elementary school mathematics: How can and should mathematics as a school subject be connected with mathematics as a discipline? Much current educational discourse centers on the importance of teachers ' subject matter
Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications
- International journal of science education
, 2003
"... This article offers a review of the major literature about attitudes to science and its implications over the past 20 years. It argues that the continuing decline in numbers choosing to study science at the point of choice requires a research focus on students ‟ attitudes to science if the nature of ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 148 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This article offers a review of the major literature about attitudes to science and its implications over the past 20 years. It argues that the continuing decline in numbers choosing to study science at the point of choice requires a research focus on students ‟ attitudes to science if the nature of the problem is to be understood and remediated. Starting from a consideration of what is meant by attitudes to science, it considers the problems inherent to their measurement and what is known about students‟ attitudes towards science and the many factors of influence such as gender, teachers, curricula, cultural and other variables. The literature itself points to the crucial importance of gender and the quality of teaching. Given the importance of the latter we argue that there is a greater need for research to identify those aspects of science teaching that make school science engaging for pupils. In particular, a growing body of research on motivation offers important pointers to the kind of classroom environment and activities that might raise pupils ‟ interest in studying school science and a focus for future research.
A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how canwe get one?
- Educational Researcher,
, 2002
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach
- American Educational Research Journal
, 1989
"... This is a report of the first year of a longitudinal study to investigate changes in preservice teachers ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 130 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This is a report of the first year of a longitudinal study to investigate changes in preservice teachers
Computer-supported intentional learning environments
- Journal of Educational Computing Research
, 1989
"... CSILE, which stands for Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments, is an educational knowledge media system. CSILE allows information in several media (text, drawings, graphs, timelines, etc.) to be entered into a common database where it is available to be retrieved, linked, commented on ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 119 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
CSILE, which stands for Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments, is an educational knowledge media system. CSILE allows information in several media (text, drawings, graphs, timelines, etc.) to be entered into a common database where it is available to be retrieved, linked, commented on, rated, and so forth. The environments and operations of CSILE are designed of information. In this article eleven principles, based on recent cognitive research, are suggested for designing computer environments that support intentional learning. These principles include making knowledgeconstruction activities overt, maintaining attention to learning goals as opposed to other goals of an activity, providing process-relevant feedback, and giving students responsibility for contributing to each other’s learning. Applications of these principles in CSILE are described, as well as observations from the first year of school try-out. BACKGROUND There has been a history of attempts in computer-assisted instruction to give students more autonomy or more control over the course of instruction. Usually
In pursuit of the expert pedagogue
- Educational Researcher
, 1986
"... you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact inform ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 115 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
The knower and the known: the nature of knowledge in research on teaching
- In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.). Review of research in education
, 1994
"... This chapter is a review of conceptions of knowledge as they appear in selected bodies of research on teaching. Writing as a philosopher of education, my interest is in how notions of knowledge are used and analyzed in a number of research programs that study teachers and their teaching. Of particul ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 98 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This chapter is a review of conceptions of knowledge as they appear in selected bodies of research on teaching. Writing as a philosopher of education, my interest is in how notions of knowledge are used and analyzed in a number of research programs that study teachers and their teaching. Of particular interest is
Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments
- Review of Educational Research
, 2003
"... Many interactive learning environments (ILEs) offer on-demand help, intended to positively influence learning. Recent studies report evidence that although effective help-seeking behavior in ILEs is related to better learning outcomes, learners are not using help facilities effectively. This selecti ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 80 (23 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Many interactive learning environments (ILEs) offer on-demand help, intended to positively influence learning. Recent studies report evidence that although effective help-seeking behavior in ILEs is related to better learning outcomes, learners are not using help facilities effectively. This selective review (a) examines theoretical perspectives on the role of on-demand help in ILEs, (b) reviews literature on the relations between help seeking and learning in ILEs, and (c) identifies reasons for the lack of effective help use. We review the effect of system-related factors, of student-related factors, and of interactions between these factors. The interaction between metacognitive skills and cognitive factors is important for appropriate help seeking, as are a potentially large space of system-related factors as well as interactions among learner- and system-related factors. We suggest directions for future research.