• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 9,231
Next 10 →

Table 1. Packet Transmission Limits

in A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring:
by Performance And Experience, Jeongyeup Paek, Krishna Chintalapudi, Ramesh Govindan 2005
"... In PAGE 4: ... The distribu- tion of the measured transmission times for Mica2 and Mi- caZ are shown in Figure 4. Table1 summarizes the statistics of these times. In Table 1, the safe achievable rate (calculated using worst case latency) rmax is the maximum radio bandwidth a node in Wisden can support.... In PAGE 4: ... Table 1 summarizes the statistics of these times. In Table1 , the safe achievable rate (calculated using worst case latency) rmax is the maximum radio bandwidth a node in Wisden can support. As one might expect, the MicaZ allows approximately an order of magnitude higher packet rate5.... ..."
Cited by 24

Table 3: Worst case percentage of retransmission and unnecessary retransmission. Percentage is with respect to required packets sent.

in Analysis of Sources of Latency in Downloading Web Pages
by Md Ahsan Habib, Marc Abrams 2000
"... In PAGE 15: ... TCP performs well inside the US and causes many unnecessary retransmissions for the international countries. We can summarize the worst case percentage of retransmission and unnecessary retransmission with respect to the required number of packets sent in Table3 (The worst case is the largest number for the six times of day for each case). From the table at most 7% of the packets are retransmitted, and no more than 3.... ..."
Cited by 12

Table 2: Worst case percentage of retransmission and unnecessary retransmission. Pecentage is with respect to required packets sent.

in Analysis of Unnecessary Retransmissions in TCP
by Md Ahsan Habib, Marc Abrams
"... In PAGE 10: ...1.4 Summary We summarize the worst case percentage of retransmission and unnecessary retransmission with respect to the required number of packets sent in Table2 . (The worst case is the largest number for the six times of day for each case in Tables A1 to A12.... ..."

Table 4: Worst case retransmission and unnecessary retransmission. Percentage is with respect to required packets sent.

in Analysis of Unnecessary Retransmissions in TCP
by Md Ahsan Habib, Marc Abrams
"... In PAGE 13: ...etransmission varies from 20-66%. In .exe file this percentage is quite low, only 6-7%. Table4 summarizes the percentage of total and unnecessary retransmissions that occurred in the worst cases. Table 4: Worst case retransmission and unnecessary retransmission.... ..."

Table 1. Steps for a packet transmission

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 3: ... 4 bytes Now, we analyze the time spent on the bus to transmit a packet. Because steps 1 4 in Table1 are executed in the local processor, we do not take these delays into ac- count. Bus transfers start at step 5 where the time taken to transfer 2048 bytes of data is 2048b s tunit blt.... In PAGE 4: ... wc i;q = (q + 1)Ci + X 8j2hp(i) wc i;q Tj Cj: (3) We define P as the set of all processors and T(p) as the set of all tasks on processor p. Assuming task i is placed on processor p, the worst-case response time of message m is given by Rm i = max q=0;1;2;:::(Rc i + wm i;q ? qTi); (4) where width of bus busy period, wm i;q is given by wm i;q = Bm i + l1( + ) + l2( + ) (5) + X 8q2P; q6 =p min l1 + l2; X 8k2T(q) wm i;q Tk nk ; where l1 = ni(q + 1); l2 = X 8j2hp(i) wm i;q Tj nj: In Equation (5), is the time taken for the bus to transfer all data in a packet and is the worst-case computation time taken for the destination processor to handle packet arrival interrupt associated with steps 9 to 13 in Table1 . The pro- cessor p has l1 + l2 packets for the busy period where l1 and l2 respectively represent the number of packets for i and all tasks of higher priority than i.... ..."

TABLE II. PACKET FORMAT FOR DATA TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION

in Store and Forward Applications in Telemedicine for Wireless IP Based Networks
by Poondi Srinivasan Pandian, Kadavath Peedikayil Safeer, Doddamallur Thirumala, Iyengar Shakunthala, Parvati Gopal, Vinod Chidambar

Table I. Network penalty for various packet sizes

in The Peregrine high-performance RPC system
by David B. Johnson, Willy Zwaenepoel 1993
Cited by 43

Table I. Network penalty for various packet sizes

in The Peregrine High-performance RPC system
by David B. Johnson, Willy Zwaenepoel

Table 1: Steps for a packet transmission in BusNet.

in Performance Analysis of BusNet Protocol for Backplane Bus-Based Interprocessor Communication
by Minyoung Sung, Naehyuck Chang, Jinsung Cho, Heonshik Shin 2000
"... In PAGE 5: ...Table1 illustrates the packet transmission steps. The map i describes the participant map located in the shared memory of participant i.... ..."

Table 4. Access Mode and Packet Transmission Miss Proba Header Data

in Design and Performance Evaluation of. . .
by Hitoshi Oi
"... In PAGE 51: ...Table4 . From this table, the average number of packets per miss (read miss or invalidation) is 1 + 2PW + dp and the average number of message transmission per miss is 2 + 2PW .... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 9,231
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University