• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 14,065
Next 10 →

Table VI. SWISSPROT - TwigStack vs TwigStackXB TwigStack TwigStackXB

in Sequencing XML data and query twigs for fast pattern matching
by Praveen Rao, Bongki Moon
Cited by 2

Table VIII. TREEBANK - TwigStack vs TwigStackXB TwigStack TwigStackXB

in Sequencing XML data and query twigs for fast pattern matching
by Praveen Rao, Bongki Moon
Cited by 2

Table X. DBLP - TwigStack vs TwigStackXB TwigStack TwigStackXB

in Sequencing XML data and query twigs for fast pattern matching
by Praveen Rao, Bongki Moon
Cited by 2

Table 2.13: Results for twig

in Generating Analyzers with PAG
by Martin Alt, Florian Martin, Reinhard Wilhelm, Technischer Bericht A 1995
Cited by 1

Table 1. Action names of twig automata

in Answering XML Twig Queries with Automata
by Bing Sun Bo, Bo Zhou, Nan Tang, Guoren Wang, Ge Yu, Fulin Jia

Table 7: DBLP - TwigStack vs TwigStackXB

in PRIX: Indexing And Querying XML Using Prufer Sequences
by Praveen Rao, Bongki Moon 2004
"... In PAGE 23: ... Note that for all the queries in Table 3 that we tested, TwigStack performed worse than TwigStackXB. As an example, Table7 shows the performance results for TwigStack and TwigStackXB for the DBLP dataset. For queries Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q7, and Q9, both PRIX and TwigStackXB gave comparable performances.... ..."
Cited by 26

Table 7. DBLP - TwigStack vs TwigStackXB

in PRIX: Indexing and querying XML using prufer sequences
by Praveen Rao, Bongki Moon 2004
"... In PAGE 11: ... Note that for all the queries in Table 3 that we tested, TwigStack performed worse than TwigStackXB. Table7 shows the performance results for TwigStack and TwigStackXB for the DBLP dataset. Other results for TwigStack have been omit- ted due to lack of space.... ..."
Cited by 26

Table 4: Twig Queries on DBLP and TreeBank(TB) Twig Data Query

in From region encoding to extended dewey: On efficient processing of xml twig pattern matching
by Jiaheng Lu, Tok Wang Ling, Chee-yong Chan, Ting Chen, Jaffar Joxan, Jiaheng Lu, Tok Wang Ling, Chee-yong Chan, Ting Chen 2005
"... In PAGE 27: ... Table4 ). These queries have difierent twig structures and combinations of parent-child and ancestor- descendant relationships.... ..."
Cited by 29

Table 3: The running times and the spee TwigStackScan vs. TwigStack

in Benefi ts of Path Summaries in an XML Query Optimizer Supporting Multiple Access Methods
by Attila Barta, Mariano P. Consens, O. Mendelzon
"... In PAGE 9: ... From Figure 8a we can deduct a holistic path summary pruning strat strategy is applicable, holistic path assures a constant running time fo disregarding the document size. In Table3 we present the runnin and TwigStackScan. Fo While the relatively ning time ize of the tackScan he person queries from Table 2 because they and while these queries are relevan of ToXinScan they are not for Twig we also present the speedup of T TwigStack.... ..."

Table 5: Number of intermediate path solutions Query TwigStack TwigStackList TJFast Useful

in From region encoding to extended dewey: On efficient processing of xml twig pattern matching
by Jiaheng Lu, Tok Wang Ling, Chee-yong Chan, Ting Chen, Jaffar Joxan, Jiaheng Lu, Tok Wang Ling, Chee-yong Chan, Ting Chen 2005
"... In PAGE 28: ...Figure 10(c) and 11(c) also show the elapsed time TwigStack and TJFast take to do a sequential scan over the input data (labels as TW-SS and TJ-SS, for TJFast, TJ-SS has included the time for decoding extended Dewey labels). Size of intermediate results Table5 shows the number of intermediate path solutions output by difierent algorithms. The last column is the number of intermediate solutions that contribute to flnal answers.... ..."
Cited by 29
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 14,065
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University